發(fā)布時間：2018-05-21 21:16

  本文選題：專家 + 卷入水平�。� 參考：《山東師范大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：Cuc,Koppel和Hirst(2007)發(fā)現說者的選擇性提取不僅會導致其出現提取誘發(fā)遺忘效應,也可能導致聽者出現類似的提取誘發(fā)遺忘效應,這種發(fā)生在聽者身上的提取誘發(fā)遺忘就被稱為社會性共同提取誘發(fā)遺忘(SS-RIF,Socially Shared Retrieval-Induced Forgetting)。出現SS-RIF的關鍵在于聽者與說者同時、隱蔽地共同提取。影響SS-RIF的因素眾多,但存在一些因素,如聽者的監(jiān)測方式,說者與聽者之間的社會關系通過影響聽者同時提取的程度來影響SSRIF。本研究擬通過三個實驗來探討說者的專家性以及聽者的卷入水平不同對SSRIF的影響。實驗1采用2(說者的專家性:專家vs.非專家)×2(話題的爭議性:爭議話題vs.非爭議話題)×3(提取類型:Rp+、Rp-和Nrp)的三因素混合實驗設計,其中,提取類型為被試內變量,說者的專家性和話題的爭議性為被試間變量,因變量為各類型項目的回憶率。實驗2使用爭議話題作為實驗材料,采用2(說者的專家性:專家vs.非專家)×2(聽者與說者的態(tài)度一致性:一致vs.不一致)×3(提取類型:Rp+、Rp-和Nrp)的三因素混合實驗設計,聽者與說者態(tài)度的一致性為被試間變量,因變量為各類型項目的回憶率。實驗3設計和實驗2相同,不同之處在于選擇性練習階段開始前,通過情境想象任務使被試處于高卷入水平。本研究得出結論如下:(1)對爭議話題的態(tài)度與說者是否一致會影響SS-RIF,但是這種影響會受到說者專家性的影響。(2)聽者的卷入水平會影響SS-RIF,與處于低卷入水平時相比,被試處于高卷入水平時,與說者同時提取的范圍可能會“超越”說者提取的內容,進而消除SS-RIF。
[Abstract]:Cucus Koppel and Hirstfen 2007) found that the selective extraction of the speaker not only led to the extraction induced forgetfulness effect, but also resulted in similar extraction-induced forgetting effect in the listener. This kind of extraction induced amnesia in the listener is called social coextraction induced amnesia SS-RIFA socially Shared Retrieval-Induced Forgetting. The key to the emergence of SS-RIF lies in the covert extraction of both the listener and the speaker. There are many factors affecting SS-RIF, but there are some factors, such as the way of listener monitoring, the social relationship between the speaker and the listener affects the degree of simultaneous extraction by the listener. In this study, three experiments were conducted to explore the effects of the speaker's expertise and the different levels of listener involvement on SSRIF. Experiment 1 used 2 (expert speaker: expert vs. Non-expert) * 2 (controversial topic: controversial topic vs. The three-factor mixed experimental design of 脳 3 (extraction type: Rp + Rp- and Nrp), in which the extracted type is the inter-subject variable, the expert nature of the speaker and the controversial topic is the inter-subject variable, and the dependent variable is the recall rate of each type of item. Experiment 2 uses controversial topics as the experimental material, using 2 (expert speaker: expert vs. Non-expert) * 2 (the attitude of the listener and the speaker is consistent: consistent vs. The three factors mixed experiment design of extracting type: RP + Rp- and Nrp) showed that the consistency of the attitude of the listener and the speaker was the variable between the subjects, and the dependent variable was the recall rate of each type of item. The design of experiment 3 was the same as that of experiment 2. The difference was that the participants were involved in the task of situational imagination before the selective exercise stage began. This study concluded that: 1) the consistency between the attitude of the speaker and the speaker will affect SS-RIFs, but this effect will be influenced by the expert influence of the speaker.) the involvement level of the listener will affect the SS-RIFs, compared with the low involvement level. When the participants were at a high level of involvement, the range of simultaneous extraction with the lobbyist might "go beyond" the content extracted by the lobbyist, thereby eliminating SS-RIFs.
【學位授予單位】：山東師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B842.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 白鷺;毛偉賓;李治亞;;社會性記憶的新領域:社會性共同提取誘發(fā)遺忘[J];心理科學進展;2016年05期

2 楊紅升,朱瀅;自我與提取誘發(fā)遺忘現象[J];心理學報;2004年02期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 劉旭;提取誘發(fā)遺忘的發(fā)展及其機制研究[D];天津師范大學;2013年

，

本文編號：1920847