發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-08 20:33

  本文選題：維吾爾族雙語學(xué)生 + 數(shù)學(xué)應(yīng)用題�。� 參考：《新疆師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：問題表征是應(yīng)用題解決的核心過程。問題表征說明了問題在頭腦中是怎樣呈現(xiàn)的,包括問題的已知和未知條件分別是什么,問題要求達(dá)到的目標(biāo)是什么,以及應(yīng)該采取怎樣的策略達(dá)到目標(biāo)等。許多研究表明應(yīng)用題類型,學(xué)生水平,題目難度,元認(rèn)知等多種因素影響個(gè)體的表征。另有研究表明雙語學(xué)生在不同語言應(yīng)用題中的解題技能不同。那么維吾爾族雙語學(xué)生數(shù)學(xué)應(yīng)用題的表征方式在維漢兩種不同的語言中是否存在差異?語言類型,學(xué)生水平、題目難度和與元認(rèn)知與問題解決時(shí)的表征之間的相互作用是怎樣的?本研究使用眼動(dòng)儀器,采用自編的16道加減應(yīng)用題并以小學(xué)四年級(jí)的維吾爾族雙語學(xué)生維被試,分別設(shè)計(jì)了實(shí)驗(yàn)來研究他們的表征類型與語言類型,學(xué)生水平、題目難度和與元認(rèn)知之間的相互作用。本研究有三個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn),實(shí)驗(yàn)一:采用問卷的方式,以自編的12道不同難度的維、漢應(yīng)用題為材料,考察了維吾爾族雙語學(xué)生維漢應(yīng)用題的表征類型。實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),語言類型,學(xué)生水平,題目難度均影響學(xué)生的表征類型。表現(xiàn)為優(yōu)生、中生、差生在易、中、難三種難度的維漢應(yīng)用題中采用的表征方式存在顯著的差異。研究二使用眼動(dòng)儀,通過分析不同水平的學(xué)生在解不同難度的維漢應(yīng)用題時(shí)的眼動(dòng)指標(biāo)的變化來考察他們的表征類型。實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)語言類型,學(xué)生水平,題目難度的不同導(dǎo)致了學(xué)生解題過程中的眼動(dòng)指標(biāo)的變化。表現(xiàn)為優(yōu)生、中生、差生在易、中、難三種難度的維漢應(yīng)用題中對(duì)數(shù)字、關(guān)鍵詞和變量名的注視時(shí)間和注視次數(shù)存在顯著的差異。實(shí)驗(yàn)三使用眼動(dòng)儀,以自編的4道中等難度的應(yīng)用題為實(shí)驗(yàn)材料,分析不同水平的學(xué)生在有無提示的維漢應(yīng)用題時(shí)的眼動(dòng)指標(biāo)的變化來考察他們的元認(rèn)知水平和表征類型以及兩者之間的相互作用。實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)不同水平的學(xué)生在有無提示的維漢應(yīng)用題中的元認(rèn)知水平存在差異,表現(xiàn)為優(yōu)生、中生、差生在有無提示句條件下對(duì)維漢應(yīng)用題中的數(shù)字、關(guān)鍵詞和變量名的注視時(shí)間和注視次數(shù)存在顯著差異。最終得出的結(jié)論如下:1.語言類型,學(xué)生水平,題目難度均影響維吾爾族雙語學(xué)生的應(yīng)用題表征類型。在維語的應(yīng)用題中學(xué)生使用有效的問題模型表征方式的次數(shù)增多。優(yōu)生傾向于使用問題模型表征方式,中等生使用的表征方式?jīng)]有表現(xiàn)出穩(wěn)定的傾向性,差生傾向于使用直接表征方式。簡單題目上學(xué)生傾向于直接表征存在差異,中等或較大難度的問題上學(xué)生傾向于使用問題模型表征方式。2.不同水平的學(xué)生在應(yīng)用題解決中表現(xiàn)出來的元認(rèn)知水平不同,優(yōu)生元認(rèn)知水平最高,中等生的元認(rèn)知水平次之,差生元認(rèn)知水平最低。語言類型影響學(xué)生的元認(rèn)知水平,在維語中表現(xiàn)出來的元認(rèn)知水平較高。
[Abstract]:Problem representation is the core process of problem solving. Problem representation explains how the problem appears in the mind, including what the known and unknown conditions of the problem are, what goals the problem requires to achieve, and what strategies should be adopted to achieve the goal. Many studies have shown that the types of application problems, the level of students, the difficulty of questions, metacognition and other factors affect individual representation. Other studies have shown that bilingual students have different problem-solving skills in different languages. Are there any differences in the representation of mathematical application problems between Uygur bilingual students and Uighur students in two different languages of Uygur and Chinese? What is the interaction between language types, student levels, problem difficulty and metacognitive and problem-solving representations? In this study, we designed experiments to study the representation type, language type and student level of Uygur bilingual students in grade four of primary school by using eye movement instrument, using 16 additional and subtractive application questions made by ourselves, and using Uygur bilingual students in grade four of primary school. The problem difficulty and the interaction with metacognition. There are three experiments in this study. The first one is to investigate the representation types of Uygur bilingual students' Uygur and Chinese word problems with 12 different difficulties of Uygur and Chinese word problems. The results show that language types, students' level and difficulty of questions all affect the types of students' representation. There are significant differences in the representation of Uighur and Chinese word problems in the easy, middle and difficult three kinds of difficulties: excellent students, middle students and poor students. In the second study, using eye movement instrument, we analyzed the change of eye movement index of students at different levels in solving different Uighur and Chinese application problems to investigate their representation types. The results show that the differences of language types, students' level and difficulty of problems lead to the change of eye movement index in the process of solving problems. There are significant differences in the fixation time and fixation times of the Uighur and Chinese application problems in the easy, middle and difficult Uighur and Chinese application problems, such as eugenics, middle students, poor students and variable names. The third experiment used eye movement instrument, taking 4 medium difficulty application problems as experimental materials, By analyzing the change of eye movement index in Uighur and Chinese word problems with or without cues, the metacognitive level and representation type of students at different levels were analyzed, and the interaction between them was investigated. The results show that there are differences in metacognition between students of different levels in Uighur and Chinese word problems with or without cues, which can be seen as the number of Uighur and Chinese word problems under the conditions of eugenics, middle students and poor students. There were significant differences in fixation time and fixation times between key words and variable names. The final conclusion is as follows: 1: 1. Language types, students' level and difficulty of questions all affect Uygur bilingual students' word problem representation type. The number of effective problem models used by middle school students in Uygur problems has increased. Eugenics tend to use problem model representation, secondary students do not show a stable tendency to use the representation, poor students tend to use direct representation. On simple topics, students tend to have differences in direct representation, and students tend to use problem model representation mode. 2. Students at different levels have different metacognition levels in word problem solving. The metacognition level of eugenics is the highest, the metacognition level of middle students is the second, and the metacognition level of poor students is the lowest. Language types affect students' metacognitive level, and the level of metacognition in Uygur language is higher than that in Uygur language.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B842

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 喬志勇;戴斌榮;;數(shù)學(xué)應(yīng)用題的心理表征研究[J];鹽城師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年06期

2 仲寧寧;陳英和;王晶;;小學(xué)4～6年級(jí)兒童數(shù)學(xué)應(yīng)用題表征模型的使用研究[J];心理學(xué)探新;2014年03期

3 岳寶霞;馮虹;;眼動(dòng)分析法在數(shù)學(xué)應(yīng)用題解題研究中的應(yīng)用[J];數(shù)學(xué)教育學(xué)報(bào);2013年01期

4 邢強(qiáng);蔡新華;陳小洵;;小學(xué)數(shù)學(xué)學(xué)習(xí)困難學(xué)生應(yīng)用題問題表征特點(diǎn)研究[J];教育導(dǎo)刊;2011年12期

5 蔡新華;邢強(qiáng);徐爭鳴;;小學(xué)數(shù)學(xué)應(yīng)用題表征研究述評(píng)[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年03期

6 郝嘉佳;齊琳;陳英和;;小學(xué)六年級(jí)數(shù)學(xué)困難兒童的元認(rèn)知特點(diǎn)及其在應(yīng)用題解決中的表現(xiàn)[J];中國特殊教育;2011年02期

7 李清;王曉辰;;小學(xué)數(shù)困生應(yīng)用題列式成績、表征水平與PASS各認(rèn)知過程的關(guān)系[J];心理科學(xué);2010年05期

8 張曉麗;;數(shù)學(xué)應(yīng)用題解題過程的眼動(dòng)研究[J];中學(xué)數(shù)學(xué)雜志;2009年12期

9 馮虹;陰國恩;陳士俊;;代數(shù)應(yīng)用題解題過程的眼動(dòng)研究[J];心理科學(xué);2009年05期

10 仲寧寧;;小學(xué)高年級(jí)兒童應(yīng)用題表征水平、工作記憶對(duì)問題解決的影響[J];中國特殊教育;2009年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 許勇;小學(xué)低年級(jí)數(shù)學(xué)學(xué)習(xí)不良兒童應(yīng)用題問題表征的特點(diǎn)[D];河南大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1862983