發(fā)布時間：2018-04-30 23:30

  本文選題：道德偽善 + 注視眼　； 參考：《吉林大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：道德偽善指個體希望表現(xiàn)得道德,但又設(shè)法避免真實行善、付出代價的行為動機。Batson(1997)最先提出了人類的道德偽善現(xiàn)象,并設(shè)計了一系列任務分配范式,用以揭示并解釋道德偽善的心理機制。近年的心理學研究表明,憤怒、權(quán)力、抽象化信息、內(nèi)團體等因素會促進道德偽善,而內(nèi)疚、感戴、宗教啟動、自我覺察、認知負荷、觀點采擇等因素則會抑制道德偽善。注視眼圖片效應指在眼狀圖片存在下,個體的決策更具親社會性,外顯行為更為慷慨和利他的現(xiàn)象。本研究將注視眼圖片引入道德偽善的研究領(lǐng)域,探討其對道德偽善是否存在抑制作用,同時與Batson利用鏡子抑制道德偽善的經(jīng)典實驗操作做對比,比較二者在抑制道德偽善程度上的差異。此外,研究還以自我覺察水平為切入點,比較兩種實驗操作的心理作用機制。本研究探討注視眼圖片對個體道德偽善現(xiàn)象的抑制作用。研究共選取211名在校大學生為研究對象,采用3(注視眼圖片組/鏡子組/無刺激控制組)×2(對自我/他人的道德判斷)的被試間實驗設(shè)計。實驗材料依據(jù)Lammers道德情境評定范式,選取了貼近當代大學生生活的情境故事。自我覺察水平采用劉旭峰等人修訂的中文版情境自我覺察量表測量。研究結(jié)果表明:1、中國文化背景下未發(fā)現(xiàn)道德偽善,道德偽善發(fā)生逆轉(zhuǎn),出現(xiàn)道德真善現(xiàn)象;2、注視眼圖片對道德偽善具有抑制作用,與控制組相比,注視眼圖片組被試的道德判斷更為嚴格;3、鏡子對道德偽善具有抑制作用,與控制組相比,鏡子組被試的道德判斷更嚴格;4、鏡子對道德偽善的抑制作用大于注視眼圖片的效果,與注視眼圖片組相比,鏡子組被試的道德判斷更嚴格;5、注視眼圖片和鏡子抑制道德偽善與個體的公我覺察水平成顯著正相關(guān),公我覺察水平越高,道德判斷越嚴格。
[Abstract]:Moral hypocrisy refers to the individual who wants to be moral, but also tries to avoid the real good deeds. The behavior motivation of paying the price. Batson 1997) first put forward the phenomenon of human moral hypocrisy, and designed a series of task allocation paradigms. The psychological mechanism used to reveal and explain moral hypocrisy. Psychological studies in recent years have shown that anger, power, abstract information, internal groups and other factors promote moral hypocrisy, while guilt, feeling, religious initiation, self-awareness, cognitive load, opinion taking and other factors will inhibit moral hypocrisy. In the presence of eye image, the effect of fixation is that the individual decision is more pro-social, and explicit behavior is more generous and altruistic. In this study, the gaze eye image was introduced into the research field of moral hypocrisy to explore whether it had inhibitory effect on moral hypocrisy, and to compare it with Batson's classical experiment of restraining moral hypocrisy by mirror. The difference between them in restraining moral hypocrisy is compared. In addition, the psychological mechanism of the two experimental operations was compared with self-awareness level. The aim of this study was to investigate the inhibitory effect of gaze-eye pictures on individual moral hypocrisy. A total of 211 college students were enrolled in the study. The subjects were designed as follows: 3 (gaze eye group, mirror group / non-stimulative control group) 脳 2 (self / others' moral judgment). According to the Lammers moral situational assessment paradigm, the experimental materials selected the situational stories close to the life of contemporary college students. The level of self-awareness was measured with the Chinese version of situational self-perception scale revised by Liu Xufeng et al. The results show that under the Chinese cultural background, moral hypocrisy has not been found, moral hypocrisy has been reversed, and the phenomenon of moral truth and kindness has been observed. The gaze eye pictures have an inhibitory effect on moral hypocrisy, compared with the control group. Compared with the control group, the moral judgment of the subjects in the mirror group was more strict than that in the control group. The inhibitory effect of the mirror on the moral hypocrisy was greater than that on the eye image. Compared with the gazing eye group, the subjects in the mirror group were more strict in moral judgment. There was a significant positive correlation between the inhibition of hypocrisy in the gaze eye picture and the hypocrisy of the individual. The higher the level of self-awareness was, the more strict the moral judgment was.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B842.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 唐江偉;路紅;劉毅;彭堅;;道德直覺決策及其機制探析[J];心理科學進展;2015年10期

2 傅鑫媛;陸智遠;寇_g;;陌生他人在場及其行為對個體道德偽善的影響[J];心理學報;2015年08期

3 鐘毅平;陳海洪;;心理距離對道德行為判斷的影響[J];心理學探新;2013年01期

4 孫嘉卿;顧璇;吳嵩;王雪;金盛華;;道德偽善的心理機制:基于雙加工理論的解讀[J];中國臨床心理學雜志;2012年04期

5 程建軍;葉方興;;德性倫理視域中的偽善[J];南京社會科學;2008年12期

6 劉旭峰;邵永聰;王偉;劉練紅;齊建林;;《情境自我覺察量表》修訂及信效度初步分析[J];第四軍醫(yī)大學學報;2006年04期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條

1 尹童;認知負荷在不同情緒與道德偽善中的調(diào)節(jié)作用[D];四川師范大學;2015年

2 郝園;解釋水平對道德偽善的影響研究[D];華中科技大學;2014年

，

本文編號：1826729