本文選題：典型陰陽五態(tài)人 + 事件相關(guān)電位�。� 參考：《山東中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：背景:“五態(tài)人格測(cè)驗(yàn)(The five-pattern personality inventory,簡(jiǎn)稱FPPI)”作為中國(guó)本土化第一個(gè)人格量表,具有較高的信效度,是中醫(yī)心理學(xué)科的標(biāo)志性成果,學(xué)者對(duì)其進(jìn)行了大量臨床應(yīng)用研究,但目前尚無五態(tài)人格測(cè)驗(yàn)的神經(jīng)生理機(jī)制的基礎(chǔ)實(shí)驗(yàn)研究。目的:探討陰陽維度下典型五態(tài)人被情志激活后的事件相關(guān)電位(ERPs)差異;初步探索五態(tài)人格差異的認(rèn)知神經(jīng)基礎(chǔ)。內(nèi)容與方法:本研究旨基于人格中情緒的重要意義,在從情志激活的角度出發(fā),通過五態(tài)人格測(cè)驗(yàn)和癥狀自評(píng)量表(SCL-90)篩選出符合入組條件的被試,運(yùn)用事件相關(guān)電位技術(shù)(ERPs)收集情志激活后不同人格被試的腦電,以人格、情志、腦區(qū)作為自變量,以腦電成分的波幅與潛伏期為因變量,分別進(jìn)行3(人格組:典型陽性五態(tài)人格、典型陰性五態(tài)人格和非典型五態(tài)人格)×3(情志激活類型:喜、憂、中性情志激活)兩因素混合實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì)的方差分析。結(jié)果:1.從腦電數(shù)據(jù)看,本實(shí)驗(yàn)范式主要在頂區(qū)、額區(qū)引發(fā)了P170、N2兩種內(nèi)源性腦電成分,兩種成分的最大峰值均出現(xiàn)在額區(qū)。腦電數(shù)據(jù)結(jié)果顯示,P170潛伏期人格因素、情志激活類型和腦區(qū)位置三者之間存在交互作用,P170波幅人格因素主效應(yīng)顯著,N2波幅和潛伏期人格因素、情志因素的主效應(yīng)均存在顯著差異。2.從腦電波形圖上看,P170波幅、N2波幅的人格因素、情志因素間存在交互作用,而ERP腦電數(shù)據(jù)分析結(jié)顯示二者間交互作用不顯著,出現(xiàn)這種情況的原因可能與被試數(shù)量、情緒激活的強(qiáng)度、環(huán)境設(shè)置等因素有關(guān),需進(jìn)一步進(jìn)行研究。
[Abstract]:Background: the five-state personality test the five-pattern personality inventory (FPPI), as the first personality scale of localization in China, has a high reliability and validity, and is a landmark achievement of traditional Chinese medicine psychology. Scholars have done a lot of clinical application research on it. However, there is no basic experimental study on the neurophysiological mechanism of five-state personality test. Aim: to explore the difference of event related potentials (ERPs) in a typical five-state person under the yin-yang dimension, and to explore the cognitive neural basis of the five-state personality difference. Contents and methods: based on the significance of emotion in personality, the participants who met the criteria were selected from the point of view of emotion activation through five-state personality test and symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90). Event-related potential technique (ERPs) was used to collect EEG of subjects with different personality after emotional activation. Personality, emotion and brain region were taken as independent variables, and the amplitude and latency of EEG components were taken as dependent variables. The variance analysis of three (personality group: typical positive five-state personality, typical negative five-state personality and atypical five-state personality) 脳 3 (emotion activation type: joy, worry, neutral emotion activation) was carried out. The result is 1: 1. From the EEG data, the experimental paradigm is mainly in the parietal region, and the frontal region triggers two endogenous EEG components, P170 and N2, and the maximum peaks of the two components occur in the frontal region. The results of EEG data showed that there was interaction among P170 latency personality factors, emotional activation type and brain area location. The main effects of P170 amplitude personality factors were significant, N2 amplitude and latency personality factors. There were significant differences in the main effects of emotional factors. The personality factors of P170 amplitude and N2 amplitude and the interaction between emotional factors and ERP EEG data showed that the interaction between them was not significant. The reason of this situation may be related to the number of subjects. The intensity of emotional activation, environmental settings and other factors need further study.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B842.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張伯華;王s，

本文編號(hào)：1792463