本文選題：男性服刑人員 + 利他行為傾向�。� 參考：《福建師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：本研究的目的是探討服刑人員的利他行為傾向,同時從社會信息的認(rèn)知加工角度出發(fā),探索服刑人員對利他信息注意偏向的特點及其內(nèi)在機(jī)制,進(jìn)一步為服刑人員犯罪預(yù)防與矯治提供一定的依據(jù)和方法。研究一主要通過利他行為情境,要求被試對利他行為的可能性進(jìn)行判斷,從而反映被試的利他行為傾向。研究二主要通過情緒Stroop任務(wù)范式,探究被試對不同詞語類型的反應(yīng)時差異,考察服刑人員是否存在對利他信息的注意偏向。研究三通過線索——靶子任務(wù)范式,對研究二中關(guān)于服刑人員對利他信息優(yōu)先注意的具體機(jī)制進(jìn)行探討,進(jìn)一步考察服刑人員對利他信息的優(yōu)先注意是由于注意的警覺還是注意的解除困難引起。結(jié)果主要有：(1)服刑人員的利他行為傾向得分顯著低于普通人群,表明服刑人員的利他行為傾向更低。(2)服刑人員對利己詞語顏色的反應(yīng)時顯著長于利他詞語,對中性詞語顏色的反應(yīng)時與利他詞語和利己詞語不存在顯著差異,說明了服刑人員對利己信息存在注意偏向；普通人群對利他詞語顏色的反應(yīng)時顯著長于利己詞語,對中性詞語顏色的反應(yīng)時與利他詞語和利己詞語不存在顯著差異,說明了普通人群對利他信息存在注意偏向。(3)在有效線索提示下,服刑人員對利己詞語的反應(yīng)時顯著短于利他詞語和中性詞語,對利他詞語和中性詞語的反應(yīng)時不存在顯著差異;在無效提示下,服刑人員對利他詞語的反應(yīng)時與利己詞語和中性詞語不存在顯著差異,對利己詞語的反應(yīng)時和中性詞語不存在顯著差異。(4)在有效線索提示下,普通人群對利他詞語的反應(yīng)時顯著短于利己詞語和中性詞語,對利己詞語的反應(yīng)時與中性詞語不存在顯著差異。在無效提示下,普通人群對利他詞語的反應(yīng)時與利己詞語和中性詞語不存在顯著差異,對利己詞語的反應(yīng)時與中性詞語不存在顯著差異。通過三個子研究,主要得出以下結(jié)論：首先,服刑人員的利他行為傾向得分與普通人群存在差異,表現(xiàn)為服刑人員利他行為傾向得分顯著低于普通人群,表明服刑人員的利他行為傾向更低；其次,服刑人員對利己信息存在注意偏向,體現(xiàn)為對利己信息優(yōu)先加工,普通人群對利他信息存在注意偏向,體現(xiàn)為對利他信息優(yōu)先加工；最后,服刑人員對利己信息注意偏向是由于注意的警覺引起,而不是注意的解除困難。同時,普通人群對利他信息存在注意警覺。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this study is to explore the altruistic behavior tendency of prisoners, and at the same time, from the perspective of social information cognitive processing, to explore the characteristics and internal mechanism of attention bias towards altruistic information among prisoners.To provide some basis and methods for the crime prevention and correction of prisoners.In the first study, the altruistic behavior situation was used to judge the possibility of altruistic behavior, so as to reflect the altruistic behavior tendency of the subjects.The second study explored the differences in the reaction time of subjects to different word types through the emotional Stroop task paradigm and investigated whether the prisoners had a bias towards altruistic information.In the third study, through the cue-target task paradigm, the specific mechanism of priority attention to altruistic information for prisoners in study 2 was discussed.To investigate further whether the priority of altruistic information is caused by alertness of attention or difficulty of relieving attention.The results showed that the altruistic behavior tendency of the prisoners was significantly lower than that of the general population, indicating that the altruistic behavior tendency of the prisoners was significantly longer than that of the altruistic words.There was no significant difference between the reaction time of neutral words and altruistic words and the altruistic words, which indicated that the prisoners had a bias towards the information of altruism, and the reaction time of the general population to the color of altruistic words was significantly longer than that of the altruistic words.There is no significant difference between the reaction time of neutral words and altruistic words and altruistic words, which indicates that the general population has attention bias to altruistic information.The reaction time of prisoners to altruistic words was significantly shorter than that of altruistic words and neutral words, but there was no significant difference in reaction time to altruistic words and neutral words.There is no significant difference between the reaction time of the prisoners to altruistic words and the altruistic words and neutral words, but there is no significant difference between the reaction time and the neutral words of the altruistic words.The reaction time of the general population to altruistic words is significantly shorter than that of altruistic words and neutral words, but there is no significant difference between the reaction time of altruistic words and neutral words.There is no significant difference between the reaction time of the general population to the altruistic words and the egoism words and the neutral words, but there is no significant difference between the reaction time of the altruistic words and the neutral words.Through three sub-studies, the main conclusions are as follows: firstly, the scores of altruistic behavior tendency of prisoners are different from those of the general population, which shows that the scores of altruistic behavior tendency of prisoners are significantly lower than those of the general population.The results show that the altruistic behavior of the prisoners is lower. Secondly, the prisoners pay attention to the information of altruism, which is reflected in the preferential processing of the information of altruism, and the attention bias of the general population to the altruistic information, which is reflected in the preferential processing of the altruistic information.Finally, the attention bias of prisoners to self-interest information is caused by attention vigilance rather than attention relief.At the same time, the general population is alert to altruistic information.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：B842.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 許天;;服刑人員情緒智力、自控力與攻擊行為的關(guān)系研究[J];黃岡師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年02期

2 關(guān)慕楨;周紅燕;劉旭峰;;暴力犯對社會暴力信息的認(rèn)知加工研究[J];中國健康心理學(xué)雜志;2013年09期

3 李薇;陳曉梅;金曉君;趙妍;李麗娜;;大學(xué)生公正世界信念與利他行為的相關(guān)性[J];中國健康心理學(xué)雜志;2014年06期

4 任慧娟;周鴻雁;關(guān)慕楨;劉旭峰;;暴力犯對暴力信息的注意偏向成分特點[J];中國健康心理學(xué)雜志;2014年07期

5 杜少臣;許大營;;服刑人員價值觀和道德意識的形成機(jī)制探析[J];凈月學(xué)刊;2014年06期

6 付琪琳;;大學(xué)生移情能力、利他行為及其相關(guān)研究[J];河北青年管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年01期

7 安獻(xiàn)麗;鄭希耕;;驚恐障礙的認(rèn)知偏向研究[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2008年02期

8 張朋云;;大學(xué)生利他行為調(diào)查分析[J];校園心理;2012年01期

9 王玉學(xué);張春菊;;成年男性服刑人員心理健康狀況研究[J];中國健康教育;2008年07期

10 王俊杰;路翰娜;孫星海;沈雪春;肖衛(wèi)良;;具有攻擊行為的男性違法青少年的人格特性分析[J];中國民康醫(yī)學(xué);2012年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 祁冬燕;不同羞怯水平兒童注意偏向特點的實驗研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2011年

2 李娟;犯罪青少年的道德情緒及其與社會行為的關(guān)系[D];山東師范大學(xué);2008年

3 方雅娟;作為情境變量的移情對利他行為的影響[D];南京師范大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號：1760390