本文選題：風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策 + 自尊水平�。� 參考：《河北師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：人們的生活充滿了決策，我們每天都在做決策，人生就是一個(gè)不斷進(jìn)行決策的過(guò)程。當(dāng)然人類的決策很多都帶有風(fēng)險(xiǎn)性，我們的生活中不可避免會(huì)進(jìn)行風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策。風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策是人類所有決策中最富有特色的，因此風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策作為個(gè)體決策的一個(gè)類別成為近年來(lái)研究的熱點(diǎn)，很多學(xué)者對(duì)其理論的探討和影響因素進(jìn)行研究，取得了一定的成果。 本研究在前人的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策理論和有關(guān)研究的基礎(chǔ)上，探討了風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策的三種影響因素：人格因素、決策任務(wù)特征因素和決策情境因素。本研究從上述影響風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策的三種特征因素中各選取了一個(gè)成分，采用2（自尊水平：高自尊、低自尊）×2（時(shí)間壓力：有時(shí)間壓力、無(wú)時(shí)間壓力）×3（概率水平：高概率水平、中概率水平、低概率水平）的三因素混合實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì)來(lái)探討它們對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策的影響，自尊水平和時(shí)間壓力為被試間變量，概率水平為被試內(nèi)變量，因變量是被試的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策分?jǐn)?shù)。 本研究所涉及的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)問(wèn)題分為三種風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策情景，因此分開(kāi)探討，所得結(jié)果如下： 在對(duì)抗疾病的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策情景中，自尊水平和時(shí)間壓力的主效應(yīng)不顯著；概率水平的主效應(yīng)顯著，被試在低概率水平下比在中概率水平和高概率水平下更傾向冒險(xiǎn)，在中概率水平和高概率水平下的決策差異不顯著；自尊水平與時(shí)間壓力、概率水平與時(shí)間壓力的交互作用均顯著。 在投資盈利的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策情景中，，自尊水平和時(shí)間壓力的主效應(yīng)不顯著；概率水平的主效應(yīng)顯著，被試在低概率水平下比在中概率水平和高概率水平下更傾向冒險(xiǎn)，在中概率水平和高概率水平下的差異不顯著；三個(gè)因素之間的交互作用都不顯著。 在投資失敗的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策情景中，自尊水平和時(shí)間壓力的主效應(yīng)不顯著；概率水平的主效應(yīng)顯著，被試在低概率水平下比在中概率水平和高概率水平下更傾向冒險(xiǎn)，在中概率水平和高概率水平下的差異不顯著；三個(gè)因素之間的交互作用都不顯著。 因此本研究得出的結(jié)論是自尊水平和時(shí)間壓力不影響風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策，概率水平對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策有顯著的影響，其中在低概率水平下人們傾向冒險(xiǎn)，在中概率水平和高概率水平下人們的決策傾向于保守。在不同的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策情景中三個(gè)因素之間的交互作用是不同的，在對(duì)抗疾病的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策情景中，自尊水平與時(shí)間壓力、概率水平與時(shí)間壓力的交互作用顯著；在投資盈利和投資失敗的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策情景中，三個(gè)因素之間的交互作用都不顯著。
[Abstract]:People's lives are full of decisions, we make decisions every day, life is a continuous decision-making process.Of course, many of our decisions are risky, and risk decisions are inevitable in our lives.Risk decision is the most characteristic of all human decision-making, so risk decision, as a category of individual decision-making, has become a hot topic in recent years. Many scholars have studied its theory and influencing factors, and achieved certain results.On the basis of the former risk decision theory and related research, this paper discusses three influencing factors of risk decision: personality factor, decision task characteristic factor and decision situation factor.In this study, one component was selected from each of the three characteristic factors that affected risk decision making, and 2 (self-esteem level: high self-esteem, low self-esteem) 脳 2 (time pressure: time pressure, no time pressure) 脳 3 (probability level: high probability level), 2 (time pressure: time pressure, no time pressure) 脳 3 (probability level: high probability level).The middle probability level and low probability level) were designed to study their influence on risk decision making. Self-esteem level and time pressure were inter-subjects variables, probabilistic level was intra-subjects variables, and dependent variables were the risk decision scores of the subjects.The risk issues involved in this study are divided into three risk decision-making scenarios and are discussed separately. The results are as follows:The main effects of self-esteem and time stress were not significant in the risk decision scenarios against disease, and the main effects of probability level were significant, subjects were more likely to take risks at low probability level than at middle probability level and high probability level.There was no significant difference in decision-making between middle probability level and high probability level, and the interaction between self-esteem level and time pressure, probability level and time pressure was significant.The main effects of self-esteem and time pressure were not significant in the risk decision-making scenario of investment profit, and the main effect of probability level was significant, the subjects were more likely to take risks at the low probability level than at the middle probability level and the high probability level.There is no significant difference between the middle probability level and the high probability level, and the interaction between the three factors is not significant.The main effects of self-esteem level and time pressure were not significant in the risk decision scenarios of investment failure, and the main effects of probability level were significant, subjects were more likely to take risks at low probability level than at middle probability level and high probability level.There is no significant difference between the middle probability level and the high probability level, and the interaction between the three factors is not significant.Therefore, the conclusion of this study is that the level of self-esteem and time pressure does not affect risk decision-making, but the probability level has a significant impact on risk decision-making, in which people tend to take risks at the low probability level.People tend to be conservative in their decisions at the medium probability level and the high probability level.The interaction between the three factors is different in different risk decision-making scenarios. In the risk decision scenarios against disease, the interaction between self-esteem level and time pressure, probability level and time pressure is significant.The interaction between the three factors is not significant in the risk decision scenarios of investment profit and investment failure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B842

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳建文;廖建橋;;核心自我評(píng)價(jià)與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)傾向[J];管理學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期

2 彭新波;高華;;時(shí)間壓力與決策[J];寧波大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2011年03期

3 陳蒂;羅嵐;羅照盛;;不同風(fēng)險(xiǎn)情景中青少年自尊與冒險(xiǎn)傾向的關(guān)系研究[J];企業(yè)家天地;2006年02期

4 何貴兵;決策任務(wù)特征對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)態(tài)度的影響[J];人類工效學(xué);1996年02期

5 胡偉國(guó);胡瑜;;時(shí)間壓力對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策中框架效應(yīng)的影響[J];心理科學(xué);2009年03期

6 謝曉非，徐聯(lián)倉(cāng);“風(fēng)險(xiǎn)”性質(zhì)的探討──一項(xiàng)聯(lián)想測(cè)驗(yàn)[J];心理科學(xué);1995年06期

7 李紓,房永青,張迅捷;再探框架對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策行為的影響[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2000年02期

8 李紓;確定、不確定及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)狀態(tài)下選擇反轉(zhuǎn):“齊當(dāng)別”選擇方式的解釋(英文)[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

9 張結(jié)海,張玲;現(xiàn)實(shí)理性:一個(gè)理解經(jīng)濟(jì)行為的框架[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2003年03期

10 莊錦英;情緒與決策的關(guān)系[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2003年04期

本文編號(hào)：1758611