本文選題：大學生　切入點：焦慮　出處：《貴州師范大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：情緒調節(jié)靈活性對于個體的身心健康發(fā)展意義重大,是目前情緒調節(jié)領域的一個重要研究方向。情緒調節(jié)靈活性既是個體靈活選擇情緒調節(jié)策略的能力,也是對策略選擇的過程,主要聚焦于靈活選擇情緒的策略及情緒調節(jié)目標。情緒調節(jié)靈活性良好的個體能夠根據(jù)情境變化要求把適宜的策略應用到適宜的情境中,同時也能靈活地選擇情緒調節(jié)目標,總體上表現(xiàn)出較高的情緒調節(jié)靈活性水平,促使個體的認知和行為更趨于合理且更有益身心健康。但情緒調節(jié)靈活性并非生而俱有,在其發(fā)展過程中與諸多影響因素相互作用,其中,個體的基本情緒便是一種重要的背景因素,如,焦慮情緒狀態(tài)。個體的焦慮狀態(tài)如何影響其情緒調節(jié)靈活性?本研究結合情緒調節(jié)策略與情緒調節(jié)目標兩種研究視角,采用兩個獨立的實驗范式,針對這一問題進行探究,旨在進一步了解情緒調節(jié)靈活性的影響機制。本研究被試來自貴州省某兩所大學在校大學生,其中,實驗一的有效被試為91人(男生44人,女生47人),實驗二的有效被試為94人(男生47人,女生47人),所有被試視力或矯正視力正常,均為右利手,對計算機操作熟練,均從未參加過同類實驗。實驗一采用基于績效的情緒調節(jié)策略靈活性范式,從策略角度探討了焦慮對情緒調節(jié)靈活性的影響。結果表明:以SAM(Self-Assessment Manikin)量表所反映的喚醒水平作為因變量,在不同強度負性情緒這個自變量上主效應顯著(F(1,88)=12.984,P=0.0010.01,ηp2=0.129),情緒強度與情緒調節(jié)策略的交互作用不顯著;以對SAM量表作答的反應時為因變量,在不同情緒調節(jié)策略這個自變量上主效應顯著(F(1,88)=12.981,p=0.0010.01,ηp2=0.129)。實驗二采用有/無預期的情緒調節(jié)靈活性范式,從目標角度探討了焦慮對情緒調節(jié)靈活性的影響。結果表明:以被試的錯誤率為因變量,有/無預期線索提示的主效應顯著(F(1,91)=45.622,P0.001,ηp2=0.334),在無預期的線索提示下,被試反應的錯誤率顯著高于有預期線索提示下的錯誤率(M無預期=0.33,M有預期=0.21),不同焦慮水平主效應顯著(F(2,91)=3.489,p0.05,ηp2=0.071);以被試對情緒圖片的反應時(ms)作為因變量,有/無預期線索提示的主效應顯著(F(1,91)=20.182,P0.001,ηp2=0.182)。研究結論:1.低焦慮水平個體在低負性刺激的狀態(tài)下在情緒調節(jié)策略上更傾向于使用認知重評;2.中度或高焦慮水平的個體在情緒調節(jié)目標上傾向于要有明確的目標,不確定性不耐受性較高。
[Abstract]:Emotional regulation flexibility is of great significance for the development of individual physical and mental health, and is an important research direction in the field of emotional regulation.The agility of emotion regulation is not only the ability of the individual to choose the emotion regulation strategy, but also the process of the choice of the strategy, which mainly focuses on the strategy of the flexible choice of emotion and the goal of emotion regulation.Individuals with good emotional regulation flexibility can apply the appropriate strategies to the appropriate situation according to the requirements of the situation change, and can also flexibly select the emotional regulation goals, which generally show a higher level of emotional regulation flexibility.Promote individual cognition and behavior to be more rational and more beneficial to physical and mental health.However, the flexibility of emotion regulation is not always born, and it interacts with many influential factors during its development. Among them, the individual's basic emotion is an important background factor, such as anxiety state.How does an individual's anxiety affect its emotional regulation flexibility?This study combines the two perspectives of emotion regulation strategy and emotion regulation goal and adopts two independent experimental paradigms to explore this problem in order to further understand the influence mechanism of emotion regulation flexibility.In this study, 91 subjects (44 males, 47 females) and 94 subjects (47 males, 47 males) from two universities in Guizhou province were enrolled in this study.There were 47 female students with normal visual acuity or corrected visual acuity, all of them were right-handed, proficient in computer operation, and had never participated in the same kind of experiment.In experiment 1, the effect of anxiety on emotional regulation flexibility was discussed from the perspective of strategy by using performance-based paradigm of emotional regulation strategy flexibility.The results showed that with the arousal level reflected in SAM(Self-Assessment Manikin scale as dependent variable, the main effect on the independent variable of negative emotion with different intensities was significantly higher than that of FF1888.984PX 0.0010.01, 畏 p2P 0.129, and the interaction between emotional intensity and emotion regulation strategy was not significant.Taking the response time to the SAM scale as the dependent variable, the main effect on the independent variable of different emotion regulation strategies was significant (F 1 / 88 / 12.981 / p = 0.0010.01, 畏 p _ (2) = 0.129).In experiment 2, the effect of anxiety on emotional regulation flexibility was discussed from the perspective of goal using the paradigm of emotional regulation flexibility with or without expectation.The results showed that with the error rate of the subjects as dependent variable, the main effect with or without expected cues was significant (45.622p 0.001, 畏 p2n 0.334g).The main effects with or without expected cues were significant (P 0.001, 畏 p2 + 0.182).Conclusion: 1.Individuals with low anxiety level were more likely to use cognitive reassessment in emotion regulation strategies under low negative stimuli.Individuals with moderate or high level of anxiety tend to have clear goals and higher tolerance of uncertainty.
【學位授予單位】：貴州師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B842.6

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 楊振華;焦世元;董薇;肖婕;蔡文鵬;田彬;嚴進;;高、低特質焦慮軍校學員的認知情緒調節(jié)策略、應對方式和焦慮的現(xiàn)況調查[J];第三軍醫(yī)大學學報;2016年20期

2 王明芳;歐陽敏;鄧曉燕;;社區(qū)全科護士焦慮與情緒智力水平狀況及其相關性[J];現(xiàn)代臨床護理;2016年05期

3 王富賢;鄒泓;李一茗;湯玉龍;;情緒調節(jié)靈活性研究進展綜述[J];中國特殊教育;2016年03期

4 劉啟剛;周立秋;喬明明;;情緒調節(jié)的影響因素研究述評[J];心理技術與應用;2015年02期

5 趙鑫;裴瑞雪;付麗;陳玲;周仁來;;高、低社交焦慮青少年情緒調節(jié)策略使用比較(英文)[J];中國臨床心理學雜志;2014年01期

6 高瞻;李新天;許律琴;李炳潔;;抑郁患者情緒調節(jié)靈活性的作用[J];中國健康心理學雜志;2013年09期

7 馬偉娜;朱蓓蓓;;自動情緒調節(jié)策略對焦慮個體負性情緒的作用[J];中國臨床心理學雜志;2012年04期

8 馬偉娜;桑標;;焦慮、抑郁青少年的情緒調節(jié)內隱態(tài)度[J];華東師范大學學報(教育科學版);2011年03期

9 李璇;侯志瑾;黃敏兒;;社交焦慮大學生元情緒評價、情緒調節(jié)方式的探索及指導[J];中國臨床心理學雜志;2011年02期

10 趙云龍;趙建新;;狀態(tài)焦慮與特質焦慮的關系[J];楚雄師范學院學報;2010年10期

相關博士學位論文 前2條

1 賈麗萍;情緒對不同焦慮水平個體抑制功能的影響[D];天津師范大學;2014年

2 邵秀巧;特質焦慮者對威脅信息注意偏向的實驗研究[D];天津師范大學;2008年

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 姚雨佳;無意識情緒調節(jié)：認知重評和表達抑制調整情緒反應[D];杭州師范大學;2011年

2 陸芳;學齡前兒童情緒調節(jié)策略的發(fā)展及其相關研究[D];華東師范大學;2004年

，

本文編號：1726940