本文選題：依戀風(fēng)格　切入點：情緒圖片　出處：《西南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：依戀風(fēng)格是個體與依戀對象在長期交往中所形成的系統(tǒng)性的情感和行為模式。關(guān)于成人依戀風(fēng)格以及與之相應(yīng)的依戀策略的理論探討,激發(fā)了大量的實證研究。近年來隨著依戀的信息加工差異在很多研究中被強調(diào),注意對依戀系統(tǒng)的影響顯得更為重要,因此越來越多的研究開始關(guān)注不同依戀風(fēng)格者的注意偏向。目前對不同依戀風(fēng)格者注意偏向的實證研究還存在幾個問題：第一,對不同依戀風(fēng)格者的注意偏向的研究結(jié)果存在不一致。第二,運用維度劃分討論依戀者的個體差異,少有研究者探討高焦慮高回避的恐懼型依戀風(fēng)格個體的注意偏向特點。第三,不同依戀風(fēng)格者的注意偏向可能具有時程特點。因此本研究將采用目前廣泛使用的依戀測量工具ECR作為劃分被試的依據(jù),根據(jù)以往研究,將依據(jù)被試在回避和焦慮維度上的得分高低,把被試劃分為四種不同依戀風(fēng)格類型,同時采用空間線索范式來研究不同依戀風(fēng)格個體注意偏向的時間進程特點(早期：100ms、中期：500ms、晚期：1250ms)。實驗一研究不同依戀風(fēng)格個體對情緒圖片的注意偏向的時間進程特點。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),在不同的時間進程上,不同依戀風(fēng)格個體對情緒性圖片的注意偏向有差異。(1)當(dāng)時程為100ms時,回避型個體對正性和負性圖片出現(xiàn)了注意偏向,具體表現(xiàn)為對正性圖片注意警覺,對負性圖片注意脫離困難；恐懼型個體對負性刺激注意脫離困難。(2)當(dāng)時程為500ms時,焦慮型個體對負性圖片有明顯的注意偏向,表現(xiàn)為注意脫離困難。(3)當(dāng)時程為1250ms時,恐懼型個體對負性圖片注意脫離困難；回避型依戀對正性和負性圖片均出現(xiàn)注意回避。實驗一采用情緒圖片作為刺激材料,主要體現(xiàn)回避型個體對負性刺激的注意回避,以及對正性刺激由警覺到回避的注意過程。然而,圖片材料只能部分反應(yīng)不同個體對情緒信息的加工,面孔信息包含了更多的社會信息,有助于進一步驗證回避型依戀個體對社會性情緒信息的注意偏向由警覺到回避的過程。實驗二采用面孔情緒為材料,進一步探究不同依戀個體的注意偏向時程特點。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),在不同時間進程上,不同依戀風(fēng)格個體對面孔情緒的注意加工也存在差異。(1)當(dāng)時程為100ms時,回避型個體對正性和負性面孔同樣出現(xiàn)了注意偏向,表現(xiàn)出對正性面孔的注意警覺,以及對負性面孔注意脫離困難;恐懼型個體對負性面孔注意脫離困難。(2)當(dāng)時程為500ms時,焦慮型個體對正性面孔存在注意偏向,表現(xiàn)出警覺。(3)當(dāng)時程為1250ms時,回避型個體對負性情緒面孔存在注意回避。綜上可見,在早期階段(100ms),回避型個體對正性情緒刺激(圖片和面孔)注意警覺；回避依戀和恐懼依戀的個體對負性情緒信息(圖片和面孔)均表現(xiàn)出注意脫離困難。而隨著時間推進,回避型依戀個體在1250ms晚期表現(xiàn)出對正性情緒圖片和負性刺激的回避。焦慮依戀個體對正性面孔的注意偏向為“警覺—回避”。本研究通過圖片和面孔兩種材料部分證明了不安全依戀個體注意加工的特點,同時發(fā)現(xiàn)了焦慮型個體和回避型個體的“警覺-回避”的注意加工特點。
[Abstract]:Attachment style is individual and attachment objects in the formation of long-term relationships in the system of emotion and behavior patterns. Discussion on adult attachment style and the corresponding theoretical attachment strategy, inspired a lot of empirical research. In recent years, with the information processing of different attachment are emphasized in many studies, pay attention to the influence of attachment the system is more important, so more and more researchers begin to pay attention to the different attachment styles of attentional bias. The different attachment style is also a few problems: first, an empirical study on the bias bias of different attachment style that results are not consistent. Second, using the dimension division to discuss individual differences attachment, less bias of high anxiety fear avoidance attachment style individual researchers. Third different attachment styles of attentional bias May have the characteristics of the time. This study will use the currently widely used tool for measuring ECR attachment were chosen as the basis, according to the previous studies, according to the subjects in the avoidance and anxiety score level, the subjects were divided into four different types of attachment style, at the same time to study the different attachment styles individual attention time course of bias using spatial cueing paradigm (early: 100ms, 500ms, 1250ms: mid late). A experimental study on time course characteristics of different attachment styles individual attention to emotional pictures bias. The study found that at different times, different attachment styles individual attention to emotional bias differences. (1) time is 100ms, the individual avoidant attentional bias for positive and negative pictures, the specific performance of attention to positive images of the negative pictures attentional disengagement ; fear of negative stimulus type individual attentional disengagement. (2) when the process is 500ms, anxiety individuals have significant attentional bias to negative pictures showed attentional disengagement. (3) the process of 1250ms, fear of negative images of individual attentional disengagement; avoidance of attachment positive and negative pictures are pay attention to avoid. The emotional pictures as stimuli, mainly reflects the individual avoidant of negative stimulus attention to positive stimulus avoidance, as well as by the alert to the attention process avoided. However, only part of the anti picture materials should be different for individual processing emotional information, including face information the more social information, help to further verify the avoidant attachmentindividuals attention to social emotional information to avoid bias by alert process. Experiment two used facial emotion as materials, to further explore the different attachment Individual attention bias characteristics of the time. The study found that in different time course, pay attention to processing different attachment styles of individual facial emotions are also different. (1) the process of 100ms, avoidant individuals on positive and negative faces appeared in the same attention bias, showing the alert to the positive face well, the face of negative attentional disengagement; fearful individuals face of negative attentional disengagement. (2) the history of 500ms, anxiety type attentional bias to the positive face, showing the alert. (3) when the process is 1250ms, to avoid individuals of negative emotional faces exist pay attention to avoid. Therefore, in the early stage (100ms), avoidant individuals to positive emotional stimuli (image and face) alert; avoidant attachment attachment and fear of the individuals to the negative emotion information (pictures and faces) showed attentional disengagement with. Time, avoidant attachment individuals showed avoidance of positive images and negative stimuli in the late 1250ms. Attachment anxiety individual attention to the positive face of the bias for "vigilance avoidance". This study through pictures and faces two kinds of materials have proved insecure attachment individual attention processing characteristics, also found that the anxiety individuals and avoidant individuals "vigilance avoidance" attention processing characteristics.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：B842

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王海濤;黃珊珊;黃月勝;孫孝游;鄭希付;;PTSD青少年對威脅圖片注意偏向的時程特點及習(xí)慣化傾向[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2012年03期

2 吳薇莉,方莉;成人依戀測量研究[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2004年02期

，

本文編號：1719626