本文選題：獨(dú)處需要　切入點(diǎn)：滿足狀態(tài)　出處：《哈爾濱師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的：（1）探討被試在獨(dú)處滿足和不滿足條件下情緒的差異；（2）探討不同獨(dú)處能力者在獨(dú)處不滿足條件下情緒的差異；（3）探討被試在不同獨(dú)處延遲滿足情境下情緒的差異。方法：（1）實(shí)驗(yàn)一：以招募自愿報(bào)名的大學(xué)生為被試，使用CAPS情緒圖片系統(tǒng)，采用單因素重復(fù)測(cè)量實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì)，自變量為測(cè)量時(shí)間（2個(gè)水平）：前測(cè)和后測(cè)；因變量為情緒的效價(jià)和喚醒度的得分。（2）實(shí)驗(yàn)二：以《獨(dú)處能力量表》為篩選工具，篩選出獨(dú)處能力高分組8名、獨(dú)處能力中分組13名和獨(dú)處能力低分組8名，使用CAPS情緒圖片系統(tǒng)，采用3×2混合實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì)，被試間變量為被試類(lèi)型（3個(gè)水平）：高獨(dú)處能力組、中獨(dú)處能力組和低獨(dú)處能力組，被試內(nèi)變量為測(cè)量時(shí)間（2個(gè)水平）：前測(cè)和后測(cè)；因變量為情緒效價(jià)和喚醒度的得分。（3）實(shí)驗(yàn)三：從實(shí)驗(yàn)二中篩選的獨(dú)處能力中分組選取30名被試，使用儀器皮阻皮溫計(jì)，采用3（延遲滿足情境：獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)物條件、無(wú)獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)物條件和問(wèn)題解決條件）*6（測(cè)量時(shí)間：T1、T2、T3、T4、T5、T6、）混合實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì)，其中延遲滿足情境為被試間變量；實(shí)驗(yàn)階段為被試內(nèi)變量，基線值T1作為協(xié)變量，因變量為皮膚電阻數(shù)值。結(jié)果：（1）實(shí)驗(yàn)一中，獨(dú)處滿足組：情緒的積極效價(jià)差異不顯著（F=0.234，p=0.630），中性效價(jià)差異不顯著（F=0.642，p=0.424），消極效價(jià)差異不顯著（F=2.888，p=0.091），積極喚醒度差異不顯著（F=0.005，p=0.944），中性喚醒度差異不顯著（F=2.792，p=0.096），消極喚醒度差異顯著（F=6.858，p=0.010）；獨(dú)處不滿足組：情緒的積極喚醒度不顯著（F=0.733，p=0.393），中性喚醒度差異不顯著（F=1.845，，p=0.176），情緒的積極效價(jià)差異顯著（F=35.861，p=0.000），中性效價(jià)差異顯著（F=18.669，p=0.000），消極效價(jià)差異顯著（F=21.567，p=0.000），消極喚醒度差異顯著（F=24.108，p=0.000）。（2）實(shí)驗(yàn)二中，積極效價(jià)：獨(dú)處能力主效應(yīng)不顯著（F=2.082，p=0.126），測(cè)量時(shí)間主效應(yīng)顯著（F=63.256，p=0.000），獨(dú)處能力與測(cè)量時(shí)間的交互作用顯著（F=15.921，p=0.000）；積極喚醒度：獨(dú)處能力主效應(yīng)顯著（F=3.304，p=0.038），測(cè)量時(shí)間主效應(yīng)不顯著（F=0.368，p=0.545），獨(dú)處能力與測(cè)量時(shí)間交互作用不顯著（F=0.448，p=0.639）；消極喚醒度：獨(dú)處能力主效應(yīng)顯著（F=13.840，p=0.000），測(cè)量時(shí)間主效應(yīng)顯著（F=12.108，p=0.001），獨(dú)處能力與測(cè)量時(shí)間交互作用顯著（F=7.837，p=0.000）。（3）實(shí)驗(yàn)三中，測(cè)量時(shí)間主效應(yīng)顯著（F=4.125，p=0.004），延遲滿足情境主效應(yīng)顯著（F=4.683，p=0.020），測(cè)量時(shí)間與延遲滿足情境交互作用不顯著（F=0.193，p=0.991）。結(jié)論：（1）在獨(dú)處滿足條件下，被試情緒差異不顯著；在獨(dú)處不滿足條件下，情緒差異顯著。（2）在獨(dú)處不滿足條件下，獨(dú)處能力高分組的情緒差異顯著。（3）在獨(dú)處的延遲滿足情境中，問(wèn)題解決條件下情緒差異顯著。
[Abstract]:Objective: (1) to explore the emotional differences of subjects under the conditions of solitude satisfaction and discontentment. (2) to explore the emotional differences of individuals with different solitude abilities under the condition of solitude discontentment. (3) to explore the emotional differences of subjects in different solitude delayed satisfaction situations.Methods: experiment 1: using CAPS emotion picture system, single factor repeated measurement design was used. The independent variables were measured time (2 levels: pre test and post test).The dependent variable was emotion titer and arousal degree. Experiment 2: using the solitude ability scale as a screening tool, 8 patients with high solitude ability, 13 with solitude ability and 8 with low solitude ability were selected.Using the CAPS emotion picture system, the 3 脳 2 mixed experiment design was used. The variables among the subjects were the type of subjects (three levels: high solitude ability group, middle solitude ability group and low solitude ability group), and the inner-subjects variables were measuring time (two levels: pre-test and post-test);The dependent variable is the score of emotional titer and arousal degree. Experiment 3: from the solitude ability selected in experiment 2, 30 subjects were divided into three groups.The mixed experimental design of no reward condition and problem solving condition (measuring time: T1T1T2OT3T4T4T5T6) was designed, in which the delayed satisfaction situation was the inter-subjects variable, the experiment stage was the in-test variable, the baseline value T1 was the covariable, and the dependent variable was the skin resistance value.Result: 1) experiment 1,鐙婊¤凍緇

本文編號(hào)：1710117