本文選題：獨處需要　切入點：滿足狀態(tài)　出處：《哈爾濱師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的：（1）探討被試在獨處滿足和不滿足條件下情緒的差異；（2）探討不同獨處能力者在獨處不滿足條件下情緒的差異；（3）探討被試在不同獨處延遲滿足情境下情緒的差異。方法：（1）實驗一：以招募自愿報名的大學(xué)生為被試，使用CAPS情緒圖片系統(tǒng)，采用單因素重復(fù)測量實驗設(shè)計，自變量為測量時間（2個水平）：前測和后測；因變量為情緒的效價和喚醒度的得分。（2）實驗二：以《獨處能力量表》為篩選工具，篩選出獨處能力高分組8名、獨處能力中分組13名和獨處能力低分組8名，使用CAPS情緒圖片系統(tǒng)，采用3×2混合實驗設(shè)計，被試間變量為被試類型（3個水平）：高獨處能力組、中獨處能力組和低獨處能力組，被試內(nèi)變量為測量時間（2個水平）：前測和后測；因變量為情緒效價和喚醒度的得分。（3）實驗三：從實驗二中篩選的獨處能力中分組選取30名被試，使用儀器皮阻皮溫計，采用3（延遲滿足情境：獎勵物條件、無獎勵物條件和問題解決條件）*6（測量時間：T1、T2、T3、T4、T5、T6、）混合實驗設(shè)計，其中延遲滿足情境為被試間變量；實驗階段為被試內(nèi)變量，基線值T1作為協(xié)變量，因變量為皮膚電阻數(shù)值。結(jié)果：（1）實驗一中，獨處滿足組：情緒的積極效價差異不顯著（F=0.234，p=0.630），中性效價差異不顯著（F=0.642，p=0.424），消極效價差異不顯著（F=2.888，p=0.091），積極喚醒度差異不顯著（F=0.005，p=0.944），中性喚醒度差異不顯著（F=2.792，p=0.096），消極喚醒度差異顯著（F=6.858，p=0.010）；獨處不滿足組：情緒的積極喚醒度不顯著（F=0.733，p=0.393），中性喚醒度差異不顯著（F=1.845，，p=0.176），情緒的積極效價差異顯著（F=35.861，p=0.000），中性效價差異顯著（F=18.669，p=0.000），消極效價差異顯著（F=21.567，p=0.000），消極喚醒度差異顯著（F=24.108，p=0.000）。（2）實驗二中，積極效價：獨處能力主效應(yīng)不顯著（F=2.082，p=0.126），測量時間主效應(yīng)顯著（F=63.256，p=0.000），獨處能力與測量時間的交互作用顯著（F=15.921，p=0.000）；積極喚醒度：獨處能力主效應(yīng)顯著（F=3.304，p=0.038），測量時間主效應(yīng)不顯著（F=0.368，p=0.545），獨處能力與測量時間交互作用不顯著（F=0.448，p=0.639）；消極喚醒度：獨處能力主效應(yīng)顯著（F=13.840，p=0.000），測量時間主效應(yīng)顯著（F=12.108，p=0.001），獨處能力與測量時間交互作用顯著（F=7.837，p=0.000）。（3）實驗三中，測量時間主效應(yīng)顯著（F=4.125，p=0.004），延遲滿足情境主效應(yīng)顯著（F=4.683，p=0.020），測量時間與延遲滿足情境交互作用不顯著（F=0.193，p=0.991）。結(jié)論：（1）在獨處滿足條件下，被試情緒差異不顯著；在獨處不滿足條件下，情緒差異顯著。（2）在獨處不滿足條件下，獨處能力高分組的情緒差異顯著。（3）在獨處的延遲滿足情境中，問題解決條件下情緒差異顯著。
[Abstract]:Objective: (1) to explore the emotional differences of subjects under the conditions of solitude satisfaction and discontentment. (2) to explore the emotional differences of individuals with different solitude abilities under the condition of solitude discontentment. (3) to explore the emotional differences of subjects in different solitude delayed satisfaction situations.Methods: experiment 1: using CAPS emotion picture system, single factor repeated measurement design was used. The independent variables were measured time (2 levels: pre test and post test).The dependent variable was emotion titer and arousal degree. Experiment 2: using the solitude ability scale as a screening tool, 8 patients with high solitude ability, 13 with solitude ability and 8 with low solitude ability were selected.Using the CAPS emotion picture system, the 3 脳 2 mixed experiment design was used. The variables among the subjects were the type of subjects (three levels: high solitude ability group, middle solitude ability group and low solitude ability group), and the inner-subjects variables were measuring time (two levels: pre-test and post-test);The dependent variable is the score of emotional titer and arousal degree. Experiment 3: from the solitude ability selected in experiment 2, 30 subjects were divided into three groups.The mixed experimental design of no reward condition and problem solving condition (measuring time: T1T1T2OT3T4T4T5T6) was designed, in which the delayed satisfaction situation was the inter-subjects variable, the experiment stage was the in-test variable, the baseline value T1 was the covariable, and the dependent variable was the skin resistance value.Result: 1) experiment 1,鐙婊¤凍緇

本文編號：1710117