本文選題：解釋水平　切入點：得失框架　出處：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：解釋水平理論屬于“社會認知”的范疇,它的核心思想是人對于某一事件的心理表征決定了人對這一事件的反應(yīng)。許多研究者發(fā)現(xiàn),人們在解釋心理距離比較遠的事物時更習(xí)慣于采用能反映事物內(nèi)涵的核心特征來解釋事物,而在解釋心理距離比較近的事物時更傾向于采用具體的、背景化的特征來解釋事物。因此,人們在選擇心理距離較近的即時獲益和心理距離較遠的延時獲益時,會產(chǎn)生差異。也有研究發(fā)現(xiàn),人們在進行跨期選擇時會因情境的不同而做出不同的選擇。本研究旨在考察被試在高低兩種解釋水平以及獲得與損失兩種框架條件下的跨期選擇的差異,以往研究都只考慮了解釋水平一種因素,而本研究在此基礎(chǔ)上加入了獲得與損失兩種框架以檢驗兩種因素的交互作用以及對跨期選擇的影響。本研究主要選取大學(xué)生為實驗研究的被試,首先通過紙筆啟動實驗啟動了被試的高低兩種解釋水平,接著設(shè)立了獲得和損失兩種不同的框架條件的跨期選擇題,以考察在這兩種因素對被試跨期選擇的影響。分析數(shù)據(jù)發(fā)現(xiàn)解釋水平的主效應(yīng)顯著,得失框架的主效應(yīng)顯著,兩者的交互作用邊緣顯著。因此得出的結(jié)論主要有以下幾個： (1)在兩種啟動條件下,損失框架中的被試選擇延遲選項的得分以及主觀值比獲得框架中的被試高。 (2)在兩種框架條件下,高解釋水平組的被試選擇延遲選項的得分以及主觀值比低解釋水平組的被試高。 (3)解釋水平和得失框架的交互作用呈邊緣顯著。 (4)簡單主效應(yīng)顯示在獲得框架中,啟動了高解釋水平的被試選擇延遲選項的得分要顯著高于啟動了低解釋水平的被試。 (5)在低水平解釋條件下,被試在兩種框架中的延遲選項得分有顯著的差異。
[Abstract]:The level of interpretation theory belongs to the category of "social cognition". Its core idea is that the psychological representation of a certain event determines a person's response to the event. Many researchers have found that, People are more accustomed to explain things with the core characteristics that reflect the connotation of things when explaining things which are far away from their psychology, but they tend to use concrete ones when explaining things that are closer to the mental distance. Background features explain things. As a result, there are differences when people choose the immediate benefits that are closer to the psychological distance and the delayed benefits that are farther away from the psychological distance. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences of intertemporal choices between participants under the conditions of high and low levels of interpretation and the conditions of acquisition and loss. Previous studies have taken into account only one factor, the level of interpretation, On the basis of this, two kinds of frame of gain and loss are added to test the interaction of the two factors and the influence on the intertemporal selection. The main purpose of this study is to select college students as the subjects of the experimental study. First, the paper starts the experiment with paper and pen to start up the two levels of interpretation of the participants, and then sets up two different frame conditions to obtain and lose the cross-period multiple choice questions. In order to investigate the influence of these two factors on the intertemporal selection of the subjects, the main effects of interpretation level are significant, the main effects of gain and loss frames are significant, and the interaction edges of the two factors are significant. Therefore, the main conclusions are as follows:. 1) under the two starting conditions, the scores and subjective values of the selection delay options in the loss frame were higher than those in the acquisition framework. (2) under the two frame conditions, the scores of the selection delay options and subjective values of the subjects in the high interpretation level group were higher than those in the low explanation level group. 3) the interaction between the level of explanation and the frame is marginal. 4) the simple main effect showed that in the acquisition framework, the participants who started the high interpretation level had significantly higher scores on the selection delay option than those who started the low explanation level. 5) under the condition of low level explanation, there were significant differences in the scores of delay options between the two frameworks.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B842

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 杜秀芳;王穎霞;趙樹強;;框架效應(yīng)研究30年的變遷[J];濟南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年03期

2 莊錦英;情緒、邊框影響決策認知過程的實驗研究[J];心理科學(xué);2004年06期

3 鳳四海;張?zhí)?黃希庭;李丹;蘇丹;;解釋水平和事件性質(zhì)對活動設(shè)定時間距離的影響[J];心理科學(xué);2008年04期

4 謝曉非,王曉田;成就動機與機會-威脅認知[J];心理學(xué)報;2002年02期

5 徐驚蟄;謝曉非;;解釋水平視角下的自己-他人決策差異[J];心理學(xué)報;2011年01期

6 陳海賢;何貴兵;;識解水平對跨期選擇和風(fēng)險選擇的影響[J];心理學(xué)報;2011年04期

7 高利蘋;李紓;時勘;;從對框架效應(yīng)的分析看風(fēng)險決策的神經(jīng)基礎(chǔ)[J];心理科學(xué)進展;2006年06期

8 李雁晨;周庭銳;周t;;解釋水平理論:從時間距離到心理距離[J];心理科學(xué)進展;2009年04期

9 梁竹苑;劉歡;;跨期選擇的性質(zhì)探索[J];心理科學(xué)進展;2011年07期

10 孫曉玲;張云;吳明證;;解釋水平理論的研究現(xiàn)狀與展望[J];應(yīng)用心理學(xué);2007年02期

，

本文編號：1679817