發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-23 15:52

  本文選題：錯(cuò)誤記憶　切入點(diǎn)：字音加工　出處：《閩南師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：研究目的：研究一從漢字字音、字形加工出發(fā)研究大學(xué)生、聾啞學(xué)生被試在漢字字音、字形加工條件下的錯(cuò)誤記憶表現(xiàn)，同時(shí)對(duì)比大學(xué)生、聾啞學(xué)生的記憶表現(xiàn)；研究二將字形關(guān)聯(lián)材料獨(dú)立出來進(jìn)行研究，為了進(jìn)一步研究多音聲旁、相同形旁條件下大學(xué)生、聾啞學(xué)生被試的錯(cuò)誤記憶表現(xiàn)，通過兩種被試的記憶表現(xiàn)之間的差異比較探討兩種被試的漢字加工特點(diǎn)，同時(shí)通過兩類被試在多音聲旁、相同形旁條件下的各自記憶差異比較分析研究漢字字形關(guān)聯(lián)錯(cuò)誤記憶的特點(diǎn)。研究三將漢字的音、形加工和語義加工聯(lián)系在一起，，使用DRM范式中的DRM詞列及漢字的聲調(diào)、結(jié)構(gòu)判斷，研究漢字字音字形加工在語義激活的基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)錯(cuò)誤記憶的影響，同時(shí)在學(xué)習(xí)測(cè)驗(yàn)階段之間加入預(yù)警處理，觀察預(yù)警處理對(duì)錯(cuò)誤記憶的影響。 研究結(jié)果：（1）大學(xué)生、聾啞學(xué)生在字音、字形關(guān)聯(lián)材料條件下都出現(xiàn)了錯(cuò)誤記憶；在字音、字形關(guān)聯(lián)材料條件下，聾啞學(xué)生被試的關(guān)鍵誘餌、無關(guān)項(xiàng)目再認(rèn)率顯著高于大學(xué)生被試的關(guān)鍵誘餌、無關(guān)項(xiàng)目再認(rèn)率，兩類被試在學(xué)習(xí)項(xiàng)目正確再認(rèn)率之間不存在顯著性差異。（2）兩類被試在多音聲旁、相同形旁關(guān)聯(lián)材料條件下均出現(xiàn)了錯(cuò)誤記憶；在多音聲旁關(guān)聯(lián)材料條件下，聾啞學(xué)生被試的關(guān)鍵誘餌、無關(guān)項(xiàng)目再認(rèn)率顯著高于大學(xué)生被試相應(yīng)項(xiàng)目的再認(rèn)率，大學(xué)生被試的學(xué)習(xí)項(xiàng)目正確再認(rèn)率顯著高于聾啞學(xué)生被試的學(xué)習(xí)項(xiàng)目再認(rèn)率；在相同形旁關(guān)聯(lián)材料條件下大學(xué)生、聾啞學(xué)生被試的學(xué)習(xí)項(xiàng)目、關(guān)鍵誘餌再認(rèn)率之間均不存在顯著性差異，聾啞學(xué)生被試的無關(guān)項(xiàng)目錯(cuò)誤再認(rèn)率顯著高于大學(xué)生被試的無關(guān)項(xiàng)目錯(cuò)誤再認(rèn)率。（3）聲調(diào)、結(jié)構(gòu)判斷條件下均出現(xiàn)了錯(cuò)誤記憶；聲調(diào)判斷條件下的關(guān)鍵誘餌錯(cuò)誤再認(rèn)率顯著高于結(jié)構(gòu)判斷條件下的關(guān)鍵誘餌錯(cuò)誤再認(rèn)率，學(xué)習(xí)項(xiàng)目正確再認(rèn)率之間不存在差異；預(yù)警處理的關(guān)鍵誘餌錯(cuò)誤再認(rèn)率顯著高于無預(yù)警處理的關(guān)鍵誘餌錯(cuò)誤再認(rèn)率，聲調(diào)判斷條件下預(yù)警和無預(yù)警處理的關(guān)鍵誘餌錯(cuò)誤再認(rèn)率之間不存在顯著性差異，結(jié)構(gòu)判斷條件下預(yù)警處理的關(guān)鍵誘餌錯(cuò)誤再認(rèn)率顯著高于無預(yù)警處理的關(guān)鍵誘餌錯(cuò)誤再認(rèn)率。 研究結(jié)論：（1）字音、字形關(guān)聯(lián)材料能夠誘發(fā)錯(cuò)誤記憶；（2）聾啞學(xué)生被試和大學(xué)生被試對(duì)漢字的字音、字形加工存在差異；（3）相對(duì)于聲調(diào)判斷而言，結(jié)構(gòu)判斷是特異性特征，能夠減少錯(cuò)誤記憶概率；（4）研究預(yù)警對(duì)錯(cuò)誤記憶的影響，需要考慮預(yù)警處理的位置及整個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)的復(fù)雜性。
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the false memory performance of the deaf and mute students under the condition of Chinese character pronunciation and shape processing, and to compare the memory performance of the college students and the deaf mute students. In the second study, the glyph related materials were studied independently. In order to further study the false memory performance of the students with polyphonic side, the same shape side condition, the deaf and mute students, By comparing the differences between the two subjects' memory performance, the processing characteristics of Chinese characters of the two subjects were discussed, and at the same time, the two kinds of subjects were in the side of polyphonic sounds. Comparative Analysis of the memory differences between Chinese characters under the condition of the same side of the form the characteristics of the Chinese character form association error memory are analyzed. The third study links the phonetic processing and semantic processing of Chinese characters and uses the DRM word list in the DRM paradigm and the tone of Chinese characters. On the basis of semantic activation, the influence of Chinese phonetic processing on false memory is studied. At the same time, early warning processing is added between learning test stages to observe the influence of early warning processing on false memory. Results: 1) College students, deaf and mute students had false memories under the condition of phonetic and glyph related materials, and under the condition of phonetic and glyph related materials, the key bait for the deaf and mute students was found. The recognition rate of unrelated items was significantly higher than that of the key decoys of college students. There was no significant difference between the correct recognition rates of the two types of subjects in learning items. False memory appeared under the condition of the same correlate material, and the key bait and unrelated item recognition rate of deaf and mute students was significantly higher than that of the corresponding item recognition rate of college students under the condition of polyphonetic para-correlating material, and the relative item recognition rate of the deaf and mute students was significantly higher than that of the corresponding item. The correct recognition rate of the learning items of the college students was significantly higher than that of the deaf and mute students, and the learning items of the deaf and mute students were higher than those of the deaf and mute students under the condition of the same relative materials. There was no significant difference in the key decoy recognition rate. The rate of false recognition of unrelated items in deaf and dumb students was significantly higher than that in college students. The rate of key decoy error recognition under tone judgment is significantly higher than that under structural judgment, and there is no difference between the correct recognition rate of learning items. The recognition rate of key decoy error in early warning is significantly higher than that in key decoy without early warning, and there is no significant difference between the recognition rate of key decoy and that of key decoy without early warning under tone judgment. The key decoy error recognition rate of early warning is significantly higher than that of key decoy without early warning. The results showed that: (1) phonetic, glyph related materials could induce false memory. (2) there were differences in Chinese characters' pronunciation and shape processing between deaf and college students) compared with tone judgment, structural judgment was a specific feature. To study the influence of early warning on false memory, we need to consider the location of early warning and the complexity of the whole experiment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：閩南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B842.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 郭秀艷;唐菁華;李荊廣;;漢字錯(cuò)誤記憶的形、音編碼差異研究[J];心理與行為研究;2007年02期

2 林仲賢,韓布新;漢字詞識(shí)別過程的形、音、義編碼作用的研究[J];心理科學(xué);1999年01期

3 劉希平;李永梅;;要點(diǎn)表征與字詞表征在錯(cuò)誤再認(rèn)中的作用[J];心理科學(xué);2007年05期

4 曲折;丁玉瓏;;漢字語音關(guān)聯(lián)對(duì)錯(cuò)誤記憶的影響[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

5 陳寶國,彭聃齡;詞義通達(dá)的三種理論模型及研究簡介[J];心理學(xué)探新;2000年01期

6 楊治良;王思睿;唐菁華;;錯(cuò)誤記憶的來源:編碼階段/保持階段[J];應(yīng)用心理學(xué);2006年02期

7 曲折;劉優(yōu);畢耀華;;漢字字形關(guān)聯(lián)對(duì)錯(cuò)誤記憶的影響[J];應(yīng)用心理學(xué);2010年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 毛偉賓;漢語錯(cuò)誤記憶通道效應(yīng)的研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2009年

2 郝興昌;DRM范式下的兒童錯(cuò)誤記憶研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2013年

本文編號(hào)：1654128