本文選題：社會(huì)排斥　切入點(diǎn)：拒絕　出處：《寧波大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：社會(huì)排斥是一種常見的負(fù)性生活事件，大量研究證實(shí)其可能對(duì)人們的身心造成一定影響。但就其對(duì)情緒產(chǎn)生何種影響，由何種原因?qū)е拢芯拷Y(jié)果并不一致。本研究選取了最常見的兩類社會(huì)排斥情境：拒絕和放逐，進(jìn)行比較研究，并設(shè)計(jì)了三個(gè)情境誘導(dǎo)下的情緒實(shí)驗(yàn)研究。研究1采用情緒自我報(bào)告法與情緒內(nèi)隱態(tài)度測(cè)量法，觀測(cè)不同社會(huì)排斥情境下個(gè)體情緒喚起的差異；研究2針對(duì)研究1結(jié)果，設(shè)計(jì)了情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略的內(nèi)隱態(tài)度改變程序(閾下EC技術(shù))，要求在社會(huì)排斥后運(yùn)用特定策略進(jìn)行情緒調(diào)節(jié)，觀測(cè)效果的變化；研究3采用ER-IAT范式，觀測(cè)社會(huì)排斥情境下個(gè)體自動(dòng)化情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略的傾向性，即推斷是否因?yàn)閭�(gè)體在特定情境下由于決策的傾向性不同，造成情緒調(diào)節(jié)效果的不同，并采用回歸分析的方法構(gòu)建社會(huì)排斥情境下個(gè)體情緒調(diào)節(jié)的心理模型。 結(jié)果顯示，(1)放逐組被試外顯情緒與情緒內(nèi)隱態(tài)度一致，均為負(fù)面情緒；拒絕組被試外顯報(bào)告消極，情緒內(nèi)隱態(tài)度表現(xiàn)為在積極圖片上出現(xiàn)注意瞬脫效應(yīng)，呈現(xiàn)情緒解離現(xiàn)象；(2)放逐組在使用表達(dá)抑制策略時(shí)情緒調(diào)節(jié)效果好于使用認(rèn)知重評(píng)(不顯著)，拒絕組在使用認(rèn)知重評(píng)時(shí)情緒調(diào)節(jié)效果好于表達(dá)抑制(顯著)；拒絕組使用認(rèn)知重評(píng)策略的情緒調(diào)節(jié)效果優(yōu)于放逐組(顯著)，放逐組使用表達(dá)抑制情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略優(yōu)于拒絕組(但不顯著)；(3)控制調(diào)節(jié)策略后，拒絕組調(diào)節(jié)效果整體優(yōu)于放逐組；(4)放逐組在自動(dòng)化情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略中傾向于使用表達(dá)抑制策略，拒絕組傾向使用認(rèn)知重評(píng)策略，拒絕組可能通過(guò)觀察積極圖片等自動(dòng)化認(rèn)知重評(píng)策略調(diào)節(jié)情緒，效果較好；(5)情境因素和自動(dòng)化情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略均可以有效預(yù)測(cè)情緒調(diào)節(jié)效果，且自動(dòng)化情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略是社會(huì)排斥在預(yù)測(cè)情緒調(diào)節(jié)效果時(shí)的中介因子。 這些結(jié)果表明，，社會(huì)排斥下個(gè)體情緒調(diào)節(jié)效果的差異性既與情境有關(guān)，又與個(gè)體情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略的選取有關(guān)。心理咨詢中應(yīng)當(dāng)更關(guān)注被放逐個(gè)體，并可啟發(fā)面對(duì)不同情境的個(gè)體采用特定的調(diào)節(jié)策略。
[Abstract]:Social exclusion is a common negative life event, and a great deal of research has confirmed that it may have a certain effect on people's body and mind. The results of this study were not consistent. This study selected the two most common social exclusion situations: rejection and exile, and carried out a comparative study. Three situational induced emotional experiments were designed. In study 1, the differences of individual emotional arousal in different social exclusion situations were observed by using the emotional self-report method and the implicit emotional attitude measurement method. The implicit attitude change program of emotion regulation strategy (subthreshold EC technique) is designed, which requires the use of specific strategies to regulate emotion after social exclusion. Observing the tendency of individual automatic emotion regulation strategy in social exclusion situation, that is, inferring whether the individual has different effect of emotion regulation because of the different tendency of decision making in a particular situation. The psychological model of individual emotion regulation under social exclusion was constructed by regression analysis. The results showed that the explicit emotion and the implicit attitude of emotion in the exiled group were consistent with those in the control group, and the negative emotion was found in the negative group, and the implicit attitude of emotion in the rejection group was reflected in the instant attention effect on the positive picture. The effect of emotion regulation in the exile group was better than that in the cognitive reappraisal group (no significant, the emotion regulation effect in the rejection group was better than that in the expression inhibition group (P < 0.05). The effect of emotion regulation using cognitive reappraisal strategy was better than that of exile group (significant). After the exile group used the expression inhibition emotion regulation strategy better than the rejection group (but not significant), the control regulation strategy was better than that of the control group. The control effect of rejection group was better than that of banishing group 4) in the automatic emotion regulation strategy, the rejection group tended to use expression inhibition strategy, while the rejection group tended to use cognitive reappraisal strategy. The rejection group could effectively predict the effect of emotion regulation by observing automatic cognitive reassessment strategies, such as positive pictures, and the effect was better than that of situational factors and automatic emotion regulation strategies. And the automatic emotion regulation strategy is the intermediary factor of social exclusion in predicting the effect of emotion regulation. These results indicate that the difference of individual emotion regulation effect under social exclusion is related to both the situation and the choice of individual emotion regulation strategy. And it can inspire individuals to adopt specific adjustment strategies in different situations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B842.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 蔡強(qiáng);吳寅;劉金婷;;社會(huì)排斥及其神經(jīng)機(jī)制[J];心理研究;2011年05期

2 馬偉娜;洪靈敏;桑標(biāo);;同伴交往、親子交往與兒童心理理論發(fā)展的關(guān)系[J];心理科學(xué);2009年01期

3 程蘇;劉璐;鄭涌;;社會(huì)排斥的研究范式與理論模型[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2011年06期

4 趙紅梅,蘇彥捷;被同伴拒絕個(gè)體的心理理解[J];中國(guó)特殊教育;2005年06期

5 王妍,羅躍嘉;大學(xué)生面孔表情材料的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化及其評(píng)定[J];中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2005年04期

6 王力;陸一萍;李中權(quán);;情緒調(diào)節(jié)量表在青少年人群中的試用[J];中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2007年03期

本文編號(hào)：1632516