本文關(guān)鍵詞： 群際威脅 攻擊 自我控制　出處：《西南大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：攻擊是人類社會(huì)普遍存在的一種現(xiàn)象,也是社會(huì)心理學(xué)領(lǐng)域的一個(gè)研究熱點(diǎn)。關(guān)于攻擊的影響因素,已有研究發(fā)現(xiàn)群際威脅能夠直接導(dǎo)致消極的群體行為產(chǎn)生,抑制或增強(qiáng)原有行為的消極程度。當(dāng)內(nèi)群體成員感受到外群體規(guī)模、勢(shì)力更大時(shí),現(xiàn)實(shí)威脅會(huì)導(dǎo)致對(duì)外群體的對(duì)抗行為,引發(fā)強(qiáng)烈的群際侵犯和沖突�，F(xiàn)實(shí)威脅和象征威脅都有相同的消極后果,如偏見(jiàn)、認(rèn)知準(zhǔn)確性下降、攻擊性集群事件等。有關(guān)自我控制資源對(duì)攻擊性的影響研究發(fā)現(xiàn),相比自我控制的個(gè)體,沒(méi)有自我控制的個(gè)體會(huì)表現(xiàn)出更多的攻擊行為,自我控制能夠顯著的負(fù)向預(yù)測(cè)攻擊行為。群際威脅會(huì)對(duì)被威脅的群體或個(gè)體造成一系列消極后果,包括情緒反應(yīng)、認(rèn)知反應(yīng)和行為反應(yīng)三個(gè)方面,且無(wú)論主觀感知到的群際威脅是否真實(shí)存在,都會(huì)引起真實(shí)的結(jié)果。以往研究發(fā)現(xiàn),群際威脅與攻擊之間存在顯著相關(guān)關(guān)系,感知到的群際威脅會(huì)使人們對(duì)外群體產(chǎn)生消極的態(tài)度和情感,如生氣、焦慮、害怕,同時(shí)也能激活多種消極行為,如歧視、對(duì)立、敵對(duì)、沖突和暴力行為,其中對(duì)立、敵對(duì)、沖突和暴力行為都屬于攻擊行為。同時(shí),研究發(fā)現(xiàn)諸如憤怒、生氣等消極情緒能直接導(dǎo)致攻擊行為,消極情緒也能導(dǎo)致更差的自我控制。因此,在群際威脅情境下,被威脅群體體驗(yàn)到威脅感,引發(fā)消極情緒,可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致攻擊傾向的增強(qiáng),以及自我控制能力的減弱。另一方面,群際威脅與執(zhí)行功能的研究發(fā)現(xiàn),個(gè)體感受到偏見(jiàn)以及刻板印象威脅時(shí),其執(zhí)行功能會(huì)下降,并繼而出現(xiàn)控制失敗如攻擊增強(qiáng)等。我國(guó)實(shí)行強(qiáng)制性分類的居民身份制度,由此形成了農(nóng)村和城市、農(nóng)民和市民兩種基本的地域群體和身份群體。以往研究結(jié)果都表明兩個(gè)群體間存在顯著的社會(huì)差異,并存在內(nèi)隱偏見(jiàn)和刻板印象。本文以農(nóng)村籍大學(xué)生為被試群體,探究在感受到來(lái)自城市籍大學(xué)生的群際威脅時(shí),是否會(huì)引起其強(qiáng)烈的情緒和行為反應(yīng)(攻擊),以及自我控制在其中的影響作用。本文通過(guò)三個(gè)研究來(lái)探討不同類型的群際威脅對(duì)攻擊的影響,以及自我控制在其中的作用。研究一通過(guò)實(shí)驗(yàn)室實(shí)驗(yàn),采用單因素實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì),探討在現(xiàn)實(shí)群際威脅情境下,現(xiàn)實(shí)威脅與攻擊的關(guān)系,以及自我控制在其中的作用;研究二同樣采用單因素實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì),探究在象征群際威脅下,象征威脅與攻擊的關(guān)系,以及自我控制在其中的作用;研究三通過(guò)實(shí)驗(yàn)室實(shí)驗(yàn),探討群際焦慮與攻擊的關(guān)系,以及自我控制在其中的作用。研究發(fā)現(xiàn):(1)現(xiàn)實(shí)威脅和群際焦慮對(duì)攻擊有顯著影響,現(xiàn)實(shí)威脅顯著負(fù)向預(yù)測(cè)攻擊,群際焦慮—狀態(tài)焦慮和特質(zhì)焦慮都顯著正向預(yù)測(cè)攻擊;(2)自我控制在現(xiàn)實(shí)威脅與攻擊中起部分中介作用,自我控制在群際焦慮—狀態(tài)焦慮和特質(zhì)焦慮與攻擊之間起完全中介作用;(3)無(wú)論是何種類型威脅以及威脅是否存在,自我控制與攻擊呈顯著負(fù)向相關(guān)關(guān)系;(4)自我控制和攻擊與消極情緒之間互相影響,消極情緒能顯著影響自我控制和攻擊,反之,自我控制和攻擊也能影響消極情緒。
[Abstract]:The attack is a common phenomenon in human society, it is also a research hotspot in the field of social psychology. The influencing factors on the attack, it has been found that intergroup threat can directly lead to the negative group behavior, negative degree of inhibition or enhancement the original behavior. When group members feel outside the group size, more powerful when a real threat against behavior will lead to foreign groups, caused strong intergroup aggression and conflict. The real threat and symbolic threat had negative consequences, such as the same cognitive bias, accuracy decline, aggressive group events. The self control resource of aggressive, compared to individual self control that will have no self control show more aggressive behavior, self control could negatively predict aggressive behavior. The intergroup threat of threatened populations or individuals made A series of negative consequences, including emotional reactions, three aspects of cognitive and behavioral responses, and whether the real existence of intergroup threat perceived, will cause actual results. Previous studies have found that there was a significant relationship between the intergroup threat and attack, the perception of intergroup threat will cause people to foreign groups have negative attitudes and emotions, such as anger, anxiety, fear, but also can activate many negative behaviors, such as discrimination, hostility, confrontation, conflict and violence, including opposition, hostility, conflict and violence are on aggressive behavior. At the same time, the study found that such as anger, anger and other negative emotions can lead directly to aggressive behavior, negative emotions can also lead to worse self control. Therefore, in the context of intergroup threat, threatened groups to experience the sense of threat, causing negative emotions, may lead to increased aggression and self. I weakened control. On the other hand, the research of intergroup threat and executive function that individuals feel prejudice and stereotype threat, their executive function will decline, and then failed to control such as attack enhancement. Mandatory classification of China's implementation of the identity system, thus forming the countryside and the city, farmers and citizens of two basic geographical groups and status groups. Previous research results show that the existence of social differences between the two groups, and the existence of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. The rural college students as subjects to explore the group, intergroup threat from city college students in feeling, whether due to its strong emotional and behavioral responses (attack), and the role of self control. Through three studies to examine the effects of different types of intergroup threat of attack, and self control The role of research. Through laboratory experiments, the single factor experiment, discussed in the realistic intergroup threat situation, the real threats and attacks, and self control in which the role of two; also used a single factor experimental design, research in the symbolic intergroup threat, the relationship between the symbol of threats and attacks self control, and the role of three; through laboratory experiments to investigate the relationship between intergroup anxiety and aggression, and self control in the role. The study found that: (1) a real threat and intergroup anxiety attack have a significant effect, a real threat to negative attacks, intergroup anxiety and state anxiety have positive prediction and trait anxiety attack; (2) self control plays a part intermediary role in the real threat and attack, self control end between intergroup anxiety, state anxiety and trait anxiety and aggression All the intermediary role; (3) no matter what type of threats and threats, self control has a significant negative correlation with attack; (4) between self control and attack and negative emotions influence each other, negative emotions can significantly affect the self control and self control and attack, on the other hand, the attack can also affect negative emotions.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B848

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 管健;柴民權(quán);;外來(lái)務(wù)工女性刻板印象威脅的應(yīng)對(duì)策略與認(rèn)同管理[J];心理科學(xué);2013年04期

2 孫傳勇;丁鳳琴;;刻板印象威脅視角下的學(xué)生標(biāo)簽威脅[J];新余學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

3 張建玲;趙玉芳;;群際威脅與對(duì)內(nèi)群體和外群體支持決策的關(guān)系研究[J];西南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2012年04期

4 謝永穩(wěn);;對(duì)大學(xué)生群體地域刻板印象的SEB研究[J];社會(huì)心理科學(xué);2012年04期

5 孫利;;大學(xué)生城鄉(xiāng)刻板印象的內(nèi)隱和外顯研究[J];云南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年02期

6 張ZM;馮江平;王二平;;群際威脅的分類及其對(duì)群體偏見(jiàn)的影響[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2009年02期

7 譚樹(shù)華;郭永玉;;大學(xué)生自我控制量表的修訂[J];中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2008年05期

8 仇妙芹;應(yīng)湘;;城鄉(xiāng)刻板印象激活的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年06期

9 王振宏;郭德俊;游旭群;高培霞;;身體攻擊行為學(xué)生自主神經(jīng)活動(dòng)的情緒喚醒特點(diǎn)[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

10 賀雯;梁寧建;;刻板印象激活的行為效應(yīng)[J];心理科學(xué);2006年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 楊慶;觀點(diǎn)采擇降低群際威脅引發(fā)的負(fù)性認(rèn)知反應(yīng)的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[D];西南大學(xué);2014年

2 黃雨晴;群際威脅背景中低社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)地位群體的注意偏好研究[D];西南大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1458931