【摘要】：文化問題的復(fù)雜性,決定了文化系統(tǒng)理論的客觀性受到質(zhì)疑。正是出于客觀地分析文化的目的,杜爾克姆建立了初步的文化系統(tǒng)理論,通過對(duì)非物質(zhì)性社會(huì)事實(shí)的研究,他看到了文化的彌散性和傳承性。帕森斯借鑒杜爾克姆的靜態(tài)成果,先后發(fā)展出動(dòng)態(tài)的行動(dòng)系統(tǒng)理論和AGIL功能格局,把功能主義文化系統(tǒng)理論推向高峰。哈貝馬斯在批判帕森斯理論的同時(shí),將文化系統(tǒng)理論和交往行為理論、社會(huì)合法化危機(jī)、啟蒙現(xiàn)代性規(guī)劃以及多元文化建構(gòu)聯(lián)系起來,揭示了文化系統(tǒng)理論的新進(jìn)展。這三人的理論正好描繪出文化系統(tǒng)理論發(fā)展的路線圖,為研究者更好地研究文化問題,提供了不同的方法和手段。
[Abstract]:The complexity of cultural problems determines that the objectivity of cultural system theory is questioned. It is for the purpose of analyzing culture objectively that Duerkem has established a preliminary theory of cultural system. Through the study of non-material social facts, he sees the diffusivity and inheritance of culture. Parsons drew on Durkham's static achievements and developed the dynamic action system theory and the AGIL functional pattern, which pushed the functionalist cultural system theory to the peak. While criticizing Parsons' theory, Habermas connects the theory of cultural system with the theory of communicative behavior, the crisis of social legalization, the planning of enlightenment modernity and the construction of multiculturalism, which reveals the new progress of the theory of cultural system. The theory of these three persons precisely describes the road map of the development of cultural system theory, and provides different methods and means for researchers to study cultural problems better.
【作者單位】： 安徽大學(xué)社會(huì)與政治學(xué)院;
【基金】：安徽省哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)規(guī)劃項(xiàng)目(AHSK11-12D53)
【分類號(hào)】：C91-0;G05

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 賈英健;全球化研究的文化轉(zhuǎn)向及邏輯意蘊(yùn)——論羅伯森的全球文化系統(tǒng)理論[J];石油大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2430133