本文選題：葛蘭西 + 文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)��； 參考：《山西大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：安東尼奧·葛蘭西深入研究了意大利資本主義社會(huì),并對(duì)無產(chǎn)階級(jí)革命運(yùn)動(dòng)進(jìn)行了反思,提出了著名的文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想。文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想在其整個(gè)理論體系中占據(jù)著核心地位,充分體現(xiàn)了哲學(xué)與政治、理論與實(shí)踐的統(tǒng)一。葛蘭西文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)為無產(chǎn)階級(jí)革命運(yùn)動(dòng)的勝利奠定了基礎(chǔ),并促進(jìn)了西方意識(shí)形態(tài)的發(fā)展。從整體性方面對(duì)葛蘭西文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想的研究,有助于我們更全面的把握這一思想,吸收其合理性因素,服務(wù)于我國的社會(huì)主義文化建設(shè)。本文主要分為三個(gè)部分,從文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想的理論來源、基本內(nèi)容和批判等方面,對(duì)葛蘭西文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想進(jìn)行了整體性的研究。第一部分主要從文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想的背景和理論淵源談起,聯(lián)系當(dāng)時(shí)葛蘭西所處的社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí),介紹了葛蘭西思想形成的社會(huì)歷史條件。并對(duì)葛蘭西文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想產(chǎn)生的理論淵源,即馬基雅維利的政治理論、馬克思的國家理論、列寧的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想進(jìn)行了闡述。第二部分是文章的重點(diǎn),從整體上論述了葛蘭西文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想。在對(duì)文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)的內(nèi)涵和特征進(jìn)行探討的基礎(chǔ)上,提出文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想的前提是完整的國家理論,存在基礎(chǔ)是市民社會(huì)。葛蘭西認(rèn)為在資本主義社會(huì)要想取得無產(chǎn)階級(jí)革命的勝利,可以采取非強(qiáng)制的手段,即通過有機(jī)知識(shí)分子對(duì)廣大群眾進(jìn)行教育、引導(dǎo),來實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)市民社會(huì)文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)的控制。具體的實(shí)現(xiàn)過程是以市民社會(huì)為實(shí)踐場(chǎng)所、有機(jī)知識(shí)分子為依靠力量、“陣地戰(zhàn)”為實(shí)現(xiàn)方法。這些理論都是葛蘭西文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想的整體性研究中必不可少的要素,發(fā)揮著不同的作用和職能,缺少其中的一部分,都不能使之完整。第三部分是對(duì)葛蘭西文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想進(jìn)行批判性的分析。葛蘭西文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想具有一定的理論影響和社會(huì)意義,對(duì)西方馬克思主義的發(fā)展有很大的影響。雖然葛蘭西文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想具有合理性和必要性,但是受到當(dāng)時(shí)社會(huì)條件的影響,其文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想也存在一定的局限性。
[Abstract]:Antonio Gramsci studied the capitalist society in Italy deeply and rethought the revolutionary movement of the proletariat and put forward the famous thought of cultural leadership. The thought of cultural leadership occupies the core position in its whole theoretical system, fully embodies the unity of philosophy and governance, theory and practice. Right has laid the foundation for the victories of the proletarian revolutionary movement and promoted the development of Western ideology. The study of Gramsci's ideology of cultural leadership from the whole is helpful for us to grasp this idea more comprehensively, absorb its rational factors and serve the construction of socialist culture in China. This article is divided into three parts. From the theoretical source, basic content and criticism of the thought of cultural leadership, Gramsci has carried out a comprehensive study of the thought of cultural leadership. The first part mainly talks about the background and theoretical origin of the thought of cultural leadership, and introduces the social history of Gramsci's thought in the social history at that time. And the theoretical origin of Gramsci's thought of cultural leadership, namely, Machiavelli's political theory, Marx's national theory, and Lenin's thought of leadership. The second part is the focus of the article, and discusses the ideology of Gramsci's cultural leadership from the whole, and discusses the connotation and characteristics of the cultural leadership. On the basis of this, the premise of putting forward the thought of cultural leadership is a complete national theory and the foundation for the existence of the civil society. The concrete realization process is to take the civil society as the practice place, the organic intellectuals rely on the strength and the "position war" as the realization method. These theories are essential elements in the holistic study of the thought of the cultural leadership of Gramsci, and play different roles and functions, and are short of one part of them. The third part is a critical analysis of Gramsci's thought of cultural leadership. Gramsci's Thought on cultural leadership has a certain theoretical and social significance. It has a great influence on the development of Western Marx's doctrine. Although the thought of Gramsci's cultural leadership is reasonable and necessary, it is subject to the society of that time. Impact conditions, the cultural leadership thought also has some limitations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：G02

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 吳友軍;鄭冬曉;;論葛蘭西“文化霸權(quán)”理論的局限[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會(huì)主義;2010年04期

2 田時(shí)綱;;“egemonia”是“領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)”還是“霸權(quán)”——葛蘭西政治理論的核心范疇[J];教學(xué)與研究;2007年08期

3 陳坤;仲帥;;葛蘭西的文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想及其當(dāng)代意蘊(yùn)[J];理論探討;2013年04期

4 劉莘;;葛蘭西:文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)及其詮釋[J];探索;2007年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2026606