本文選題：文化產(chǎn)業(yè) + 產(chǎn)業(yè)質(zhì)量�。� 參考：《江蘇科技大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)型升級需求越來越迫切的背景下,提高經(jīng)濟(jì)質(zhì)量和效率已是迫在眉睫,提升產(chǎn)業(yè)質(zhì)量和效率已成為區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的關(guān)鍵。而文化產(chǎn)業(yè)作為市場前景廣闊的綠色產(chǎn)業(yè),已成為經(jīng)濟(jì)新常態(tài)下區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)戰(zhàn)略性調(diào)整的承載產(chǎn)業(yè);大力發(fā)展文化產(chǎn)業(yè),不僅有利于創(chuàng)造高層次精神文化需求來促進(jìn)消費(fèi)結(jié)構(gòu)升級,還有利于依靠其擴(kuò)散效應(yīng)來增加相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)附加值,有助于提質(zhì)增效經(jīng)濟(jì)改革方案的順利實(shí)施。江蘇省具備發(fā)展文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的優(yōu)勢,頒布了多項(xiàng)鼓勵政策,已取得有目共睹的成果;2015年,江蘇文化產(chǎn)業(yè)增加值全國第二,發(fā)展指數(shù)全國第三,生產(chǎn)力指數(shù)全國第一,已發(fā)展成江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)的支柱性產(chǎn)業(yè)。江蘇文化產(chǎn)業(yè)在快速發(fā)展中也暴露出一些亟待解決的問題,例如增速放緩、產(chǎn)業(yè)質(zhì)量不高、資金投向不清、資源配置缺少科學(xué)依據(jù)等;因此,需要運(yùn)用多種理論分析工具研究江蘇文化產(chǎn)業(yè)質(zhì)量和產(chǎn)業(yè)效率,并以測算的結(jié)果作為憑據(jù)商討進(jìn)一步提升文化產(chǎn)業(yè)質(zhì)效水平的措施。本文從文化產(chǎn)業(yè)、產(chǎn)業(yè)質(zhì)量和產(chǎn)業(yè)效率三個角度對現(xiàn)有研究成果進(jìn)行了梳理,運(yùn)用統(tǒng)計分析方法來了解江蘇文化產(chǎn)業(yè)現(xiàn)狀,借鑒產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、質(zhì)量管理學(xué)等理論,詳細(xì)闡述文化產(chǎn)業(yè)質(zhì)量和產(chǎn)業(yè)效率的內(nèi)涵以及延伸出來的四大產(chǎn)業(yè)質(zhì)量屬性和兩大產(chǎn)業(yè)效率屬性;運(yùn)用定性和定量相結(jié)合的方法構(gòu)建符合江蘇實(shí)際的文化產(chǎn)業(yè)質(zhì)量評價模型,對文化產(chǎn)業(yè)質(zhì)量進(jìn)行測評;依據(jù)隨機(jī)前沿理論構(gòu)建江蘇文化產(chǎn)業(yè)生產(chǎn)函數(shù)模型,規(guī)范地確定生產(chǎn)函數(shù)形式,逐層分析文化產(chǎn)業(yè)效率;并運(yùn)用折線圖、四象限分析法、相關(guān)系性分析和回歸分析四種方法揭示文化產(chǎn)業(yè)質(zhì)量與產(chǎn)業(yè)效率之間的關(guān)系。通過研究發(fā)現(xiàn):(1)江蘇文化產(chǎn)品制造類行業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)質(zhì)量較高,創(chuàng)意和設(shè)計類行業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)效率較高,廣播電視影視服務(wù)和文化藝術(shù)服務(wù)的產(chǎn)業(yè)質(zhì)量和產(chǎn)業(yè)效率排名都墊底;(2)江蘇文化產(chǎn)業(yè)綜合質(zhì)量和整體產(chǎn)業(yè)效率并不高;(3)產(chǎn)業(yè)質(zhì)量和產(chǎn)業(yè)效率存在內(nèi)在聯(lián)系,產(chǎn)業(yè)效率的提高能促進(jìn)產(chǎn)業(yè)質(zhì)量的提升。最后,基于測評結(jié)果,從高效配置資源、強(qiáng)化產(chǎn)業(yè)治理、壯大優(yōu)勢行業(yè)和精準(zhǔn)扶植弱勢行業(yè)、產(chǎn)業(yè)融合發(fā)展四個方面提出了八項(xiàng)建議,有利于進(jìn)一步提高江蘇文化產(chǎn)業(yè)質(zhì)效水平,為文化產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的調(diào)整提供了有益參考。
[Abstract]:In the background of the increasing demand for the transformation and upgrading of economic structure, improving the quality and efficiency of the economy is imminent. The key to the development of the regional economy is to improve the quality and efficiency of the industry. As a green industry with a broad market prospect, the cultural industry has become the bearing industry of the strategic adjustment of the regional economy under the new economy. The development of cultural industry is not only conducive to the creation of high-level spiritual and cultural needs to promote the upgrading of the consumption structure, but also to increase the added value of the related industries by its diffusion effect. It is helpful to the smooth implementation of the economic reform program. Jiangsu has the advantages of developing cultural and productive industries and has promulgated a number of encouraging policies, which have been obtained. In 2015, Jiangsu's cultural industry added second, the development index nationwide was third, the productivity index was first in the country, and it had developed into a pillar industry in Jiangsu's economy. The cultural industry in Jiangsu also exposed some problems to be solved in rapid development, such as the slowdown in growth, the poor quality of the industry, and the unclear investment in the industry. There is a lack of scientific basis for the allocation of resources. Therefore, it is necessary to use a variety of theoretical analysis tools to study the quality and efficiency of Jiangsu's cultural industry and to discuss the measures to further improve the quality of the cultural industry by using the results of calculation. The present research results are carried out from three aspects of cultural industry, industrial quality and industrial efficiency. In order to understand the present situation of Jiangsu's cultural industry by statistical analysis, we use the theory of industrial economics and quality management to elaborate the connotation of the quality of cultural industry and industrial efficiency, the quality attributes of the four major industries and the two industrial efficiency attributes, and the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods for the construction of Jiangsu. The quality evaluation model of cultural industry is evaluated, the production function model of Jiangsu culture industry is constructed according to the stochastic frontier theory, the production function form is determined and the efficiency of cultural industry is analyzed by layer by layer, and the four methods of line map, four quadrant analysis, related system analysis and regression analysis are used to reveal the text. The relationship between industrial quality and industrial efficiency has been found: (1) Jiangsu's cultural products manufacturing industry has higher industrial quality, higher industrial efficiency in creative and design industries, and the bottom of the industrial quality and industrial efficiency of radio, television, television, film and television services and cultural and artistic services; (2) comprehensive quality and overall production of the cultural industry in Jiangsu. The efficiency of industry is not high; (3) there is an inherent link between industrial quality and industrial efficiency, and the improvement of industrial efficiency can promote the upgrading of industrial quality. Finally, based on the results of evaluation, eight suggestions are put forward from four aspects: efficient allocation of resources, strengthening of industrial governance, strengthening the dominant industry and precision supporting the disadvantaged industry, and the development of the industry. One step is to raise the quality and efficiency level of Jiangsu's cultural industry, and provide a useful reference for the adjustment of the cultural industry policy.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：江蘇科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G124

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳靜;;政府補(bǔ)助能提升文化企業(yè)的投資效率嗎?——基于我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)上市公司的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];財會通訊;2017年06期

2 顧群;;財政補(bǔ)貼對企業(yè)創(chuàng)新效率影響研究——基于創(chuàng)新投資異質(zhì)性視角[J];財會通訊;2016年36期

3 陳金英;楊青山;張鵬;劉賀賀;;吉林省房地產(chǎn)的經(jīng)濟(jì)效率研究[J];東北師大學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2016年04期

4 金雯;陳舒;;新常態(tài)背景下江蘇文化產(chǎn)業(yè)融合發(fā)展的實(shí)踐演進(jìn)與路徑優(yōu)化[J];江蘇社會科學(xué);2016年06期

5 胡宗哲;;新疆克拉瑪依文化供給側(cè)結(jié)構(gòu)改革的路徑選擇[J];實(shí)事求是;2016年06期

6 張桂玲;;基于DEA的文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資效率研究[J];會計之友;2016年21期

7 葉光海;;三潭枇杷栽培管理技術(shù)與產(chǎn)業(yè)質(zhì)量提升對策[J];安徽林業(yè)科技;2016年05期

8 翁旭青;;文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力實(shí)證研究——基于杭州與其他城市的比較[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年08期

9 王波;吳子玉;;城市文化產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力綜合評價方法研究——基于范數(shù)灰關(guān)聯(lián)度確定權(quán)重的江蘇樣本分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2016年04期

10 趙利;;我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力要素貢獻(xiàn)度的測算[J];統(tǒng)計與決策;2016年02期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 祁述裕;;我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)政策之展望[N];中國財經(jīng)報;2016年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉元發(fā);促進(jìn)我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的財稅政策研究[D];財政部財政科學(xué)研究所;2014年

2 鮑楓;中國文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)集群發(fā)展研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 何凡;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的研發(fā)投入能促進(jìn)企業(yè)盈利能力的提高嗎?[D];華東交通大學(xué);2016年

2 尹瀟;文化企業(yè)成長性的影響因素研究[D];山東大學(xué);2016年

3 邢雅潔;我國區(qū)域文化產(chǎn)業(yè)效率差異及影響因素研究[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué);2015年

4 王曄君;基于DEA-Tobit分析法的上海文化產(chǎn)業(yè)效率及影響因素研究[D];東華大學(xué);2015年

5 徐子龍;湘西武陵山文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略研究[D];吉首大學(xué);2014年

6 陳飛宇;河北省文化產(chǎn)業(yè)可持續(xù)發(fā)展評價研究[D];燕山大學(xué);2014年

7 盧新新;基于因子分析的河南省旅游產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展質(zhì)量研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2014年

8 唐輝;我國食品產(chǎn)業(yè)效率評價及影響因素分析[D];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

9 安麗娜;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)評價指標(biāo)體系研究[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué);2014年

10 汪歡;湖北省文化產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力評價分析[D];西南財經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號：1816570