二戰(zhàn)后歐盟與美國(guó)對(duì)非發(fā)展援助的比較分析
[Abstract]:Africa is a continent where problems and opportunities coexist. On the one hand, the development of Africa is an urgent issue, and its stability and development are not only related to the fundamental interests of the African people, but also related to world peace and prosperity; on the other hand, the African continent has an important strategic position, vast and fertile land and rich mineral deposits, which is full of vitality and vitality. The European Union and the United States provided development assistance to Africa as early as the end of World War II, but although they belong to the Western world, they are different in terms of aid interests. According to the vertical combing of the decades after World War II, we can find that the EU's development assistance to Africa has been slow and progressive, the amount of aid has been increasing, and it has been expanding and deepening in the field of aid. The proportion of African aid in the overall foreign assistance of the European Union is relatively high, which reflects the comprehensive and balanced consideration of the EU's emphasis on political, economic, historical influence and other factors in Africa. Africa is very important in the overall diplomatic strategic system of the European Union; However, the United States' development assistance to Africa has shown a fluctuating trend, with a great deal of ups and downs in the amount of aid, and the choice of aid regions has been constantly adjusted according to the changes in the situation, and the proportion of aid to Africa in the overall foreign aid of the United States is also relatively low, reflecting that the interests of the United States in Africa are relatively single, and Africa is generally regarded as a secondary region of the global strategy in the service of the United States. In addition, through the horizontal comparison at the beginning of the 21 century, it can be found that both the European Union and the United States in the new period have increased their attention to Africa at the same time, and there is convergence in the performance of development assistance to Africa, but there are differences in the starting points of motivation behind them. In contrast, the European Union is more focused on Africa's economic value stimulated by the economic crisis and competition, while the United States attaches more importance to Africa's security value in counter-terrorism cooperation and energy supply after the September 11 incident.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號(hào)】:D871.2;D85
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 何志鵬;;歐洲聯(lián)盟體制內(nèi)的發(fā)展權(quán)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2007年01期
2 關(guān)春巧;;布什政府的美國(guó)對(duì)外援助政策改革探析[J];國(guó)際政治研究;2005年04期
3 劉曉平;;歐盟對(duì)外援助之“人權(quán)導(dǎo)向”對(duì)非洲的影響[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治論壇;2009年03期
4 丁韶彬;;官方發(fā)展援助的新趨勢(shì)[J];現(xiàn)代國(guó)際關(guān)系;2006年05期
5 余文勝;;從希拉里訪非看美國(guó)對(duì)非政策調(diào)整[J];現(xiàn)代國(guó)際關(guān)系;2009年09期
6 舒運(yùn)國(guó);外援在非洲經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中的作用[J];西亞非洲;2001年02期
7 張永蓬;歐盟對(duì)非洲援助評(píng)析[J];西亞非洲;2003年06期
8 姚桂梅;美國(guó)非洲政策重心轉(zhuǎn)移的背景及影響[J];西亞非洲;1998年03期
9 王新影;;歐盟對(duì)援非政策的調(diào)整[J];亞非縱橫;2009年04期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 魏雪梅;冷戰(zhàn)后中美對(duì)非洲援助比較研究[D];中共中央黨校;2011年
2 劉博;歐盟對(duì)外人權(quán)政策研究[D];山東大學(xué);2007年
3 王新影;歐盟對(duì)外援助與歐洲一體化[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2010年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 潘苗;二十一世紀(jì)初美國(guó)對(duì)非洲官方援助分析[D];外交學(xué)院;2011年
2 李艷玲;冷戰(zhàn)后歐盟與美國(guó)對(duì)外援助比較[D];外交學(xué)院;2009年
本文編號(hào):2499558
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/waijiao/2499558.html