【摘要】：文明沖突是世界不同文明交往與融合的必然結(jié)果。從人類文明發(fā)展的歷史進(jìn)程來(lái)看,文明沖突的存在,也是人類文明發(fā)展的必然。因此,在不同文明的交往與融合中,存在文明沖突是正常的,但像亨廷頓那樣過度地放大文明沖突,并把它看作是當(dāng)今世界對(duì)立與割裂的根源的思想,在理解與認(rèn)識(shí)上是有問題的。文明之間的沖突并不是不可解的,在馬克思的歷史觀與文明觀的視野中,實(shí)現(xiàn)不同文明體之間生產(chǎn)力的普遍發(fā)展與普遍交往是解決不同文明之間沖突的根本出路與方法。因此,在唯物主義歷史觀的視野中,不同文明之間的沖突,并不是無(wú)法克服的,也不是永久存在的,亨廷頓從文明沖突的視角來(lái)解釋當(dāng)今世界格局的思想,在解釋方式上可能存在本末倒置的問題。由此可見,不是不同文明體之間的沖突導(dǎo)致了當(dāng)今世界的格局與秩序,相反,是不同文明體之間的交往與融合的廣度與深度形成了當(dāng)今世界的格局與秩序。從歸根結(jié)底的意義上講,是不同文明體之間的生產(chǎn)力發(fā)展?fàn)顩r與社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平最終決定著當(dāng)今世界的格局與秩序。
[Abstract]:The clash of civilizations is the inevitable result of the communication and fusion of different civilizations in the world. From the historical process of the development of human civilization, the existence of civilization conflict is also the necessity of the development of human civilization. Therefore, in the exchange and fusion of civilizations, it is normal to have a clash of civilizations, but to magnify them excessively, like Huntington, and to regard it as the root cause of antagonism and fragmentation in today's world, There are problems in understanding and understanding. The conflict between civilizations is not unsolvable. In the view of Marx's view of history and civilization, realizing the universal development and communication of productive forces among different civilizations is the fundamental way out and method to solve the conflict between different civilizations.In the perspective of Marx's view of history and civilization, the realization of the universal development and communication of productive forces between different civilizations is the fundamental way out. Therefore, in the view of materialistic view of history, the conflict between civilizations is not insurmountable, nor is it permanent. Huntington explained the current world pattern from the perspective of clash of civilizations. There may be the problem of putting the cart before the horse in the way of interpretation. It can be seen that it is not the conflict between different civilizations that leads to the pattern and order of today's world, on the contrary, the breadth and depth of communication and fusion between different civilizations form the pattern and order of today's world. In the final analysis, it is the development of productive forces and the level of socio-economic development among different civilizations that ultimately determine the pattern and order of the world today.
【作者單位】： 華中師范大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金青年項(xiàng)目“馬克思恩格斯的文明觀及其實(shí)踐價(jià)值研究”(14CZX007)
【分類號(hào)】：D815

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 艾倫·斯瑪特;馮丹;;文明沖突及促成對(duì)話的條件[J];山東社會(huì)科學(xué);2012年05期

2 李詠梅;文明沖突與國(guó)家利益的博弈[J];綏化學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

3 胡紹炯;十年來(lái)亨廷頓“文明沖突”論重點(diǎn)問題研究概述[J];商丘師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

4 塞繆爾·亨廷頓,郭學(xué)堂,成帥華;文明的沖突與世界秩序的重塑[J];國(guó)外社會(huì)科學(xué);1998年06期

5 李敏;;文明沖突及其化解之道[J];國(guó)際關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

6 孫相東;“9.11”事件與“文明沖突”的認(rèn)識(shí)誤區(qū)[J];國(guó)際觀察;2002年06期

7 魏艾;;文明沖突還是天下大同——以“西學(xué)東漸”為例辨析亨廷頓“文明沖突論”[J];武漢科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

8 梁勝明;;違背唯物史觀和辯證思維的“文明無(wú)沖突論”——評(píng)余秋雨的《“文明沖突”的誤區(qū)》[J];甘肅高師學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

9 陳韜凡;;泰南沖突的文明模式[J];東南亞研究;2009年05期

10 張江瑜;;“阿拉伯例外論”終結(jié)了嗎?——兼論中東變局中的文明沖突[J];金田(勵(lì)志);2012年07期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王國(guó)紅;論影響中東穩(wěn)定的民族、宗教和利益因素[D];華中師范大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2435243