【摘要】：本文對(duì)族群沖突中的"安全困境"的既有文獻(xiàn)所做的批判性分析,為建立一個(gè)動(dòng)態(tài)和整合的族群沖突理論奠定了部分基礎(chǔ)。目前,許多運(yùn)用"安全困境"的概念來(lái)理解族群沖突的嘗試都是建立在對(duì)此概念不夠準(zhǔn)確甚至是錯(cuò)誤的理解之上。"安全困境"理論和更為寬泛的螺旋模型實(shí)際上構(gòu)成了一個(gè)動(dòng)態(tài)、通用和強(qiáng)有力的戰(zhàn)略互動(dòng)理論,而這一理論抓住了引發(fā)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的一般性動(dòng)力。因此,"安全困境"理論和更為寬泛的螺旋模型為一個(gè)動(dòng)態(tài)和整合的族群沖突理論鋪平了道路,而這樣的理論也能整合國(guó)際關(guān)系理論中各個(gè)學(xué)派對(duì)族群沖突的不同理解。文章最后分析了該理論的可行性和價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:This paper makes a critical analysis of the existing literature on the "security dilemma" in ethnic conflict, which lays a partial foundation for the establishment of a dynamic and integrated theory of ethnic conflict. At present, many attempts to use the concept of "security dilemma" to understand ethnic conflict are based on an inaccurate or even erroneous understanding of the concept. The theory of "security dilemma" and the broader spiral model actually constitute a dynamic, general and powerful strategic interaction theory, which captures the general motive force of the war. Therefore, the "security dilemma" theory and the broader spiral model pave the way for a dynamic and integrated theory of ethnic conflict, which can also integrate different understandings of ethnic conflict among different schools of international relations theory. Finally, the feasibility and value of the theory are analyzed.
【作者單位】： 復(fù)旦大學(xué)國(guó)際關(guān)系與公共事務(wù)學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D81

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沃爾夫;朱帥軍;;沖突理論和分析社會(huì)學(xué)[J];現(xiàn)代外國(guó)哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)文摘;1983年06期

2 尹雪萍;毛澤東有關(guān)矛盾的處理方法與西方?jīng)_突理論關(guān)于沖突的解決方法之比較[J];毛澤東思想研究;2001年01期

3 顏鵬飛;;構(gòu)建社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)與西方和諧沖突理論[J];紅旗文稿;2007年02期

4 席s，

本文編號(hào)：2300825