當(dāng)前國際反恐情報(bào)合作模式比較研究
[Abstract]:Since the end of the Cold War, terrorism has gradually developed into a global focus and a huge hidden danger to the security and stability of the international community. The global joint prevention and combat against terrorism is a problem that must be faced and solved by the current international security and the security of each country. As a result, international counter-terrorism cooperation has been widely valued by all countries and actively explored multi-directional and multi-level modes of cooperation. In anti-terrorism activities, the acquisition and exchange of information is undoubtedly an extremely important but extremely difficult task. Under the influence of the current network environment and big data, terrorism is characterized by networking, internationalization and instability. Therefore, countries will certainly counter-terrorism intelligence cooperation on the agenda and attach great importance to it. Through the elaboration of the concept and characteristics of anti-terrorism intelligence, this paper analyzes the current situation of international anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation, and systematically discusses the organization mode of regional anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation, including the CIS anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation. The European Union's anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation, the ASEAN anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation, the Arab League's anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation and the cooperation model of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization on counter-terrorism intelligence, and explored the cooperation of other counter-terrorism organizations, such as the United Nations Counter-Terrorism Committee, The World Criminal Police Organization and the World Bank member countries of the Financial Intelligence Cooperation Centre. According to the characteristics, commonality and difference of these existing information cooperation modes, the author points out that there are three common points in the current international anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation mode: first, the institutionalization of cooperation laws and regulations; The second is the mechanism of anti-terrorism warning, and the third is the sharing of anti-terrorism information. The paper also discusses its differences: first, the difference of the target of anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation; second, the difference of intelligence handling command system; third, the cognitive difference of intelligence cooperation among countries. In particular, it points out that there are some differences in the current mode of international anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation in the sources of terrorism, the intelligence command and handling system, the cognition of cooperation and the mode of cooperation, etc. It is pointed out that the cooperation of regional anti-terrorism intelligence is based on a stronger common interest and a wider scope of cooperation. In the last chapter, through the analysis of the situation faced by the international anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation, aiming at the actual situation of our country, we find out the problems and shortcomings in our country's anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation mode, and according to our own national conditions and the actual situation, Draw lessons from foreign anti-terrorist intelligence mechanism and model to make up for the lack of anti-terrorism intelligence work in China. In this paper, two charts are drawn to show the design of anti-terrorist intelligence early warning system and intelligence sharing process in China, and try to build a three-dimensional, omnidirectional anti-terrorism intelligence early warning and sharing system to ensure the timely and accurate information. Enhancing the utilization of anti-terrorism intelligence, promoting anti-terrorism cooperation with other countries, and making efforts to crack down on terrorists are conducive to maintaining world peace and stability.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:中國人民公安大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:D815.5
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳明;凌云翔;;反恐情報(bào)中心主導(dǎo)下的情報(bào)共享機(jī)制研究[J];江南社會學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期
2 李春;;恐怖融資犯罪防控路徑研究(上)——以刑法120條和191條為視角[J];犯罪研究;2015年05期
3 尹建強(qiáng);;論古代軍事著作《孫子兵法》中的思想主題[J];出版廣角;2015年09期
4 盧文剛;蔡裕嵐;;新加坡的全民反恐及其啟示[J];中國應(yīng)急管理;2015年05期
5 劉瑞紅;;中美反恐情報(bào)工作比較研究[J];科技情報(bào)開發(fā)與經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年06期
6 李杰楠;;我國反恐情報(bào)體系的不足與完善[J];法制與社會;2015年06期
7 趙云鵬;;東南亞地區(qū)反恐問題研究[J];遼寧警專學(xué)報(bào);2014年06期
8 王英良;;普京新政與俄羅斯東正教會公共外交[J];西伯利亞研究;2014年05期
9 羅剛;;反恐對策:美國經(jīng)驗(yàn)與中國選擇[J];政法論叢;2014年05期
10 高榮偉;;令人膽寒的摩薩德[J];僑園;2013年09期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 王利文;東南亞反恐合作的國際制度研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條
1 李楠;中國—東盟地區(qū)反恐合作體系研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2014年
2 顧煒;反恐預(yù)警中的情報(bào)管理研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2009年
3 王振東;東盟反恐合作及制度化建設(shè)[D];山東大學(xué);2009年
4 莊曉英;論當(dāng)代恐怖主義的演變和發(fā)展[D];上海交通大學(xué);2008年
5 肖新;新制度主義視野下的國際反恐合作研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2007年
6 石玉英;經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化下恐怖主義犯罪研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2004年
,本文編號:2265952
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/waijiao/2265952.html