【摘要】：韓國是解決朝鮮半島問題的重要主體,韓國政府的對(duì)朝政策直接影響著韓朝關(guān)系及半島局勢的發(fā)展。韓國現(xiàn)任李明博政府于2008年上臺(tái)后,調(diào)整了此前金大中政府及盧武鉉政府時(shí)期的對(duì)朝包容的政策基調(diào),轉(zhuǎn)而采取實(shí)用主義的政策基調(diào),并在此基礎(chǔ)上,以“相互主義”為原則,制定了“共存與共榮”的對(duì)朝政策,以及“無核、開放、3000”的政策手段。李明博政府的對(duì)朝政策是韓國政府對(duì)朝政策的又一次轉(zhuǎn)折與斷裂,其背后不僅有李明博總統(tǒng)個(gè)人因素的影響,更有韓國國內(nèi)保守政治勢力掌權(quán)、“南南沖突”深化及國民輿論對(duì)朝保守化傾向加劇的作用；另外,韓朝雙方的力量對(duì)比以及韓國對(duì)于朝鮮具有的威脅程度的認(rèn)識(shí)均直接影響著本屆政府對(duì)朝政策的選擇；以美國因素為中心的朝鮮半島外部因素則更多發(fā)揮著結(jié)構(gòu)性作用,而美國因素對(duì)于李明博政府的對(duì)朝政策而言有著更為特殊的關(guān)鍵性作用。韓國將在2012年進(jìn)行總統(tǒng)大選,李明博政府的任期即將結(jié)束�；仡櫪蠲鞑┱畬�(shí)行基于實(shí)用主義政策基調(diào)的對(duì)朝政策后韓朝關(guān)系及半島局勢發(fā)生的變化,其對(duì)往屆政府對(duì)朝政策的調(diào)整雖然具有必然性、必要性與合理性,卻由于其實(shí)用主義政策基調(diào)的根本問題,以及具體對(duì)朝政策本身的缺陷和實(shí)施行動(dòng)上的疏漏,而未能獲得預(yù)期中的實(shí)際效果。事實(shí)上,李明博政府正在做出更多的外交努力,以期在其任期即將結(jié)束之際,緩和韓朝關(guān)系,穩(wěn)定半島局勢。當(dāng)然,鑒于李明博政府在卸任前改變實(shí)用主義政策基調(diào)的可能性微乎其微,實(shí)用主義的政策基調(diào)對(duì)于李明博政府的具體對(duì)朝政策所具有的規(guī)范作用會(huì)持續(xù)存在,無論李明博政府如何就對(duì)朝具體接觸方法與手段進(jìn)行靈活調(diào)整,政府始終會(huì)秉承實(shí)用的態(tài)度,堅(jiān)持“相互主義”原則,在保持總體強(qiáng)硬的同時(shí)略帶緩和。
[Abstract]:South Korea is an important subject to solve the Korean Peninsula problem, and the Korean government's policy towards the DPRK directly affects the inter-Korean relations and the development of the situation on the peninsula. After South Korea's current Lee Myung-bak government came to power in 2008, it adjusted the policy tone of the previous Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun 's policies towards North Korea, and instead adopted a pragmatic policy tone. On this basis, it was based on the principle of "mutualism." The policy of "coexistence and common prosperity" and the policy of "no nuclear, opening up to 3000" were formulated. Lee Myung-bak 's policy towards the DPRK is yet another turning point and rupture of the South Korean government's policy towards the DPRK. Behind it is not only the influence of President Lee Myung-bak 's personal factors, but also the power of conservative political forces in South Korea. The deepening of the "South-South conflict" and the increasing tendency of national opinion to the conservatism of the DPRK, in addition, the power contrast between the two Koreas and the South Korea's understanding of the threat to the DPRK directly affect the choice of the policy of the current government towards the DPRK; The external factors of the Korean Peninsula, centered on the United States factor, play a more structural role, while the American factor plays a more special and crucial role in Lee Myung-bak 's policy towards North Korea. South Korea will hold a presidential election in 2012, and the term of office of Lee Myung-bak is nearing its end. Recalling the changes that have taken place in the relations between the two Koreas and the situation on the peninsula since the implementation of the policy of Lee Myung-bak based on the tone of the pragmatism policy towards the DPRK, although it is inevitable, necessary and reasonable for the adjustment of the policy of the previous governments towards the DPRK, However, due to the fundamental problems of its pragmatic policy tone, as well as the defects of the DPRK policy itself and the omission in the implementation of the policy, it fails to obtain the expected practical effect. In fact, the Lee administration is making more diplomatic efforts to ease relations between the two Koreas and stabilize the peninsula as his term draws to a close. Of course, given that the Lee Myung-bak administration is unlikely to change the tone of its pragmatism policy before leaving office, the normative role of the pragmatism policy tone for the Lee Myung-bak administration's specific policy towards the DPRK will continue to exist. No matter how flexibly the Lee Myung-bak administration adjusts the specific ways and means of contact with the DPRK, it will always uphold a practical attitude, adhere to the principle of "mutualism," and maintain its overall toughness while at the same time relenting slightly.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D831.26

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張三南;;論國際關(guān)系中的實(shí)用主義[J];長白學(xué)刊;2010年01期

2 凌勝利;郭銳;;反美主義與韓國外交政策[J];遼東學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年01期

3 王生;;韓國外交的美國情結(jié)與現(xiàn)實(shí)抉擇——接近美國并不會(huì)疏遠(yuǎn)中國[J];東北亞論壇;2008年04期

4 馬建英;韓玉貴;;論李明博政府的實(shí)用主義外交[J];東北亞論壇;2009年01期

5 汪偉民;;進(jìn)退失據(jù):檢視李明博的內(nèi)外政策[J];東北亞論壇;2009年02期

6 方秀玉;;反思金大中政府的對(duì)朝政策[J];東北亞論壇;2009年05期

7 張旭東;王耀東;;“實(shí)用主義”的異化:李明博政府對(duì)朝政策困境的根源[J];東北亞論壇;2011年04期

8 李明博;;攜手開創(chuàng)先進(jìn)化之路[J];當(dāng)代韓國;2008年01期

9 汪偉民;;李明博的外交新思維與中韓關(guān)系[J];當(dāng)代韓國;2008年04期

10 張鍵;;當(dāng)代韓國外交決策機(jī)制分析[J];當(dāng)代韓國;2010年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 宣善文;論冷戰(zhàn)后韓國的對(duì)朝政策[D];青島大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2239342