【摘要】：冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束后，世界朝多極化方向發(fā)展，國(guó)家之間關(guān)系日趨緊密，區(qū)域一體化趨勢(shì)不斷加強(qiáng)，北美自由貿(mào)易區(qū)與歐盟的率先建立更為全球區(qū)域合作的開展起到積極的示范作用。在這樣的大環(huán)境影響下，1997年爆發(fā)的亞洲金融危機(jī)將東亞也推上了區(qū)域合作的道路，形成了以“10+3”為主渠道的初步合作框架。 日本作為東亞地區(qū)最重要的國(guó)家之一，在東亞地區(qū)合作的過程中一直希望扮演關(guān)鍵性角色——成為東亞地區(qū)的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人。由于金融危機(jī)后的形勢(shì)變化以及來(lái)自美國(guó)的壓力，日本不得不調(diào)整其東亞政策，在21世紀(jì)伊始提出了建立“東亞共同體”的構(gòu)想。 日本前首相小泉純一郎于2002年首次以官方姿態(tài)提出東亞合作的構(gòu)想，這個(gè)版本的構(gòu)想以中國(guó)為假想敵，主要意在通過鞏固日美同盟來(lái)抵消中國(guó)和東盟在東亞地區(qū)的作用，，從而使日本在東亞一體化合作中居于主導(dǎo)地位。但由于小泉首相過于依賴日美同盟、將東亞鄰里關(guān)系棄之不顧，因此其提出的東亞合作構(gòu)想也不了了之。 2009年，日本鳩山內(nèi)閣秉承“友愛精神”和“亞洲一員”的理念，再次將構(gòu)建“東亞共同體”作為開展東亞合作及推行東亞外交的政治符號(hào)，將多年來(lái)踟躕不前的東亞合作進(jìn)程推到了新的高度。但鳩山版本的“東亞共同體”極具理想主義色彩，其構(gòu)建終究囿于現(xiàn)實(shí)未能順利展開。 由于日本政壇持續(xù)動(dòng)蕩、世界金融危機(jī)的巨大沖擊和2011年大地震的重創(chuàng)，日本近幾年的東亞合作態(tài)度似乎又有退回到自民黨時(shí)代的趨勢(shì)。不論是小泉純一郎的“對(duì)美一邊倒”還是鳩山由紀(jì)夫的“回歸亞洲”，亦或是野田佳彥的“重新?lián)肀绹?guó)”，日本的東亞政策始終在“亞洲一員”與“日美同盟”之間徘徊。日本未來(lái)的東亞政策如何演變，東亞共同體能否找到適合于本地區(qū)的道路，都尚是未知之路。 本文在梳理日本多年來(lái)東亞合作政策的基礎(chǔ)上，深入探討東亞共同體建設(shè)的可行之道。
[Abstract]:After the end of the Cold War, the world developed towards multi-polarization, the relationship between countries became closer and closer, and the trend of regional integration was strengthened. The North American Free Trade area (NAFTA) and the European Union (EU) took the lead in establishing a more global regional cooperation, which played an active role in demonstration. Under the influence of this environment, the Asian financial crisis broke out in 1997 pushed East Asia into the road of regional cooperation, and formed a preliminary cooperation framework with "103" as the main channel. As one of the most important countries in East Asia, Japan has always wanted to play a key role in the process of cooperation in East Asia-to become the leader of East Asia. Due to the changes in the situation after the financial crisis and the pressure from the United States, Japan had to adjust its East Asia policy and put forward the idea of establishing the East Asian Community at the beginning of the 21st century. In 2002, former Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi first put forward the concept of East Asian cooperation in an official manner. This version of the concept, with China as the imaginary enemy, is mainly intended to offset the role of China and ASEAN in the East Asian region by consolidating the Japan-US alliance. So that Japan in East Asia integration cooperation in the leading position. However, because Prime Minister Koizumi relied too much on the Japanese-US alliance and abandoned the neighborhood relations in East Asia, his idea of cooperation in East Asia also failed. In 2009, Adhering to the idea of "fraternity" and "a member of Asia", the Japanese cabinet of Hatoyama once again took the construction of "East Asian Community" as a political symbol for carrying out East Asian cooperation and promoting East Asian diplomacy. The process of East Asian cooperation, which has been hesitant for many years, has been pushed to a new level. However, Hatoyama's East Asian Community is idealistic, and its construction has not been carried out smoothly due to the reality. As Japan's political turmoil, the impact of the world financial crisis and the 2011 earthquake hit hard, Japan's East Asia cooperation attitude in recent years seems to have retreated to the LDP era. Whether it is Junichiro Koizumi's "one-sided to America", Hatoyama's "return to Asia", or Noda's "reembrace the United States", Japan's East Asia policy has been hovering between "one member of Asia" and the "Japanese-American alliance." How Japan's future East Asia policy evolves and whether the East Asian Community can find a path suitable for the region is still unknown. On the basis of analyzing Japan's cooperation policy in East Asia for many years, this paper probes into the feasible ways to construct East Asian Community.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D831.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王聯(lián)合;;東亞共同體:構(gòu)想、機(jī)遇、挑戰(zhàn)[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治論壇;2006年02期

2 王毅;亞洲區(qū)域合作與中日關(guān)系[J];外交學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

3 宋均營(yíng);;東亞合作的新態(tài)勢(shì)及中國(guó)的戰(zhàn)略選擇[J];太平洋學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

4 馮昭奎;建設(shè)東亞共同體的十大關(guān)鍵因素[J];外交學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

5 喬林生;;東亞合作與中日兩國(guó)的政策選擇[J];日本研究;2007年04期

6 張?zhí)N嶺;;東亞合作和共同體建設(shè):路徑及方式[J];東南亞縱橫;2008年11期

7 任曉;;東亞合作的區(qū)域內(nèi)外互動(dòng)新態(tài)勢(shì)[J];國(guó)際問題研究;2010年02期

8 劉少華;;東亞區(qū)域合作的路徑選擇[J];國(guó)際問題研究;2007年05期

9 張?zhí)N嶺;;東亞合作之路該如何走?[J];外交評(píng)論(外交學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2009年02期

10 任曉;;東亞合作的發(fā)展與問題[J];東南亞縱橫;2006年06期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 董永裁;;淺談“東亞共同體”的構(gòu)建及其對(duì)策[A];中日關(guān)系史研究·2010年第1期（總第98期）[C];2010年

2 劉江永;;東亞共同體與中日關(guān)系:理想、現(xiàn)實(shí)與選擇[A];中日關(guān)系史研究·2011年第2期（總第103期）[C];2011年

3 凌星光;;東亞共同體的核心應(yīng)是東盟10+3——關(guān)于新東亞模式的構(gòu)筑[A];中日關(guān)系史研究·2010年第1期（總第98期）[C];2010年

4 iJ

本文編號(hào)：2227668