蘇聯(lián)西藏政策探析(1919-1935)
發(fā)布時間:2018-08-23 19:47
【摘要】:第一次世界大戰(zhàn)結束后,沙俄政府垮臺,但俄國與英國在中亞地區(qū)的大角逐并未結束,其中西藏地區(qū)是二者爭奪的重點區(qū)域之一。西藏地區(qū)對于俄國來說有著特殊的地緣政治戰(zhàn)略地位。十月革命后,沙皇政權終于倒塌了。在布爾什維克上臺后,為繼續(xù)抵抗英國對西藏施加的影響,蘇聯(lián)曾一度努力試圖恢復與西藏的聯(lián)系。第一次世界大戰(zhàn)后蘇聯(lián)西藏政策活躍期是1922年到1928年。在此期間,蘇聯(lián)政府為恢復俄藏關系并進行政治拉攏,利用與西藏傳統(tǒng)的宗教關系,并利用德爾智作為蘇聯(lián)與西藏關系的調(diào)和人,接連派出三個包含布里亞特人和卡爾梅克人的宗教使團遠赴西藏,并在其后努力利用商貿(mào)手段來拉攏西藏,蘇藏關系一度升溫。但是在20世紀20年代后期至30年代初,由于蘇聯(lián)國內(nèi)局勢的震蕩——“大清洗”運動,西藏政治局勢的變化——達賴與班禪的矛盾公開化,以及外部勢力干擾,致使蘇聯(lián)西藏政策失去驅(qū)動力,逐漸停止并最終壽終正寢。蘇聯(lián)始終未能與西藏建立起正式的官方聯(lián)系。西藏地區(qū)自古以來就是我國領土,任何帝國主義國家對西藏的侵略、企圖把西藏從我國領土分裂出去的行為以及對第十四世達賴喇嘛的支持,都是對我國主權的侵犯。
[Abstract]:After the end of World War I, the Russian government collapsed, but the great competition between Russia and Britain in Central Asia was not over. Tibet has a special geopolitical strategic position for Russia. After the October Revolution, the czar regime finally collapsed. After the Bolsheviks came to power, the Soviet Union tried to restore ties to Tibet to continue its resistance to British influence over Tibet. The active period of Soviet policy on Tibet after World War I was from 1922 to 1928. During this period, the Soviet government made use of traditional religious relations with Tibet to restore Russian-Tibetan relations and make political gains, and used Del Chi as a mediator of relations between the Soviet Union and Tibet. After sending three religious missions, including Buryat and Kalmek, to Tibet, Soviet-Tibet relations warmed up. However, from the late 1920s to the early 1930s, due to the shock of the internal situation in the Soviet Union, the "cleansing" movement, the change in the political situation in Tibet, the open contradiction between the Dalai Lama and the Panchen Lama, and the interference of external forces, As a result, the Soviet Union's Tibet policy lost its driving force, gradually stopped and finally died. The Soviet Union has never been able to establish official ties with Tibet. Since ancient times, Tibet has been the territory of our country. The aggression of any imperialist country against Tibet, the attempt to separate Tibet from the territory of our country and its support for the 14th Dalai Lama are all violations of China's sovereignty.
【學位授予單位】:鄭州大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2015
【分類號】:D829.512
本文編號:2199729
[Abstract]:After the end of World War I, the Russian government collapsed, but the great competition between Russia and Britain in Central Asia was not over. Tibet has a special geopolitical strategic position for Russia. After the October Revolution, the czar regime finally collapsed. After the Bolsheviks came to power, the Soviet Union tried to restore ties to Tibet to continue its resistance to British influence over Tibet. The active period of Soviet policy on Tibet after World War I was from 1922 to 1928. During this period, the Soviet government made use of traditional religious relations with Tibet to restore Russian-Tibetan relations and make political gains, and used Del Chi as a mediator of relations between the Soviet Union and Tibet. After sending three religious missions, including Buryat and Kalmek, to Tibet, Soviet-Tibet relations warmed up. However, from the late 1920s to the early 1930s, due to the shock of the internal situation in the Soviet Union, the "cleansing" movement, the change in the political situation in Tibet, the open contradiction between the Dalai Lama and the Panchen Lama, and the interference of external forces, As a result, the Soviet Union's Tibet policy lost its driving force, gradually stopped and finally died. The Soviet Union has never been able to establish official ties with Tibet. Since ancient times, Tibet has been the territory of our country. The aggression of any imperialist country against Tibet, the attempt to separate Tibet from the territory of our country and its support for the 14th Dalai Lama are all violations of China's sovereignty.
【學位授予單位】:鄭州大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2015
【分類號】:D829.512
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前2條
1 沈志華;;難以彌合的裂痕——蘇聯(lián)對中印沖突的立場及中蘇分歧公開化(1959—1960)[J];清華大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2009年06期
2 張植榮;蘇聯(lián)東歐劇變對西藏問題的影響與啟示[J];青海民族學院學報;1993年02期
,本文編號:2199729
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/waijiao/2199729.html
最近更新
教材專著