冷戰(zhàn)后美國的東亞政策
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-09 20:35
【摘要】：東亞地區(qū)因其所處的特殊位置,向來為世人所關(guān)注。隨著蘇聯(lián)解體、冷戰(zhàn)的結(jié)束,東北亞地區(qū)的格局也發(fā)生了較大變化。半島核問題、中國的和平崛起、臺海問題以及中日東海問題,使這一地區(qū)不斷發(fā)生著變化。發(fā)生于2001年的9·11事件,改變了整個世界,也挑戰(zhàn)的美國既有的亞太戰(zhàn)略：美日、美韓同盟出現(xiàn)了新的變化,不斷修改“和平憲法”的日本也在不斷加緊落實其“正�；瘒摇钡哪繕�。小布什的單邊主義戰(zhàn)略與持續(xù)數(shù)年的阿富汗、伊拉克戰(zhàn)爭以及爆發(fā)于08年底的全球金融風暴使得美國的實力受到了一定程度的影響、美國的國家利益也在不斷的遭到挑戰(zhàn)。 冷戰(zhàn)后,美國各個時代的領(lǐng)導人,都在不斷調(diào)整著東亞的政策。這種政策調(diào)整,與美國全球戰(zhàn)略及其東亞戰(zhàn)略息息相關(guān)。長期以來,理想主義一直處于美國的外交戰(zhàn)略的指導地位。冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束后,美國國內(nèi)的新保守主義勢力抬頭,使得美國的戰(zhàn)略受到了多種思想的共同影響,產(chǎn)生了多種戰(zhàn)略模式。而美國的政策正體現(xiàn)出了戰(zhàn)略模式多元化的特點�？v觀冷戰(zhàn)后美國的東亞政策,都反映出了多戰(zhàn)略模式結(jié)合的特點。 冷戰(zhàn)后,美國失去了明確的戰(zhàn)略對手,因而,尋找潛在的戰(zhàn)略對手就成為了美國的主要目標。東亞地區(qū)是二戰(zhàn)結(jié)束以來世界經(jīng)濟發(fā)展最快的地區(qū)之一。中國又因為其廣闊的領(lǐng)土和龐大的人口數(shù)量以及近年來實行的改革開放政策而正在成為東亞地區(qū)的主要力量。正在崛起的中國成為了美國的首要潛在對手,遏制中國的崛起則成為了美國東亞戰(zhàn)略的主要目標。圍繞這一目標,美國在東亞地區(qū)做出了一系列的戰(zhàn)略調(diào)整。由此產(chǎn)生的美國東亞政策對東亞地區(qū)的發(fā)展產(chǎn)生了重要影響。 本文將對冷戰(zhàn)后美國的東亞政策的理論基礎進行分析,對美國東亞政策的脈絡進行梳理,對中美關(guān)系的發(fā)展經(jīng)歷做簡要介紹,并對美國東亞政策的前景做出預測。
[Abstract]:East Asia, because of its special position, has always been concerned by the world. With the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, the pattern of Northeast Asia has also changed greatly. The nuclear issue of the peninsula, the peaceful rise of China, the Taiwan Strait issue and the East China Sea issue between China and Japan have made the region constantly changing. The September 11 incident, which took place in 2001, changed the whole world and challenged the existing US Asia-Pacific strategy: the US-Japan alliance has undergone new changes. Japan, which has been revising its pacifist constitution, is also stepping up its goal of a normalised nation. Bush's unilateralist strategy and years of war in Afghanistan, Iraq and the global financial turmoil that broke out in late 2008 have affected American power to a certain extent, and American national interests have been constantly challenged. After the Cold War, American leaders of all ages are constantly adjusting their policies in East Asia. This policy adjustment is closely related to the US global strategy and its East Asia strategy. For a long time, idealism has been in the guiding position of American diplomatic strategy. After the end of the Cold War, the neoconservatism in the United States rose, which made the strategy of the United States influenced by a variety of ideas and produced a variety of strategic models. The policy of the United States reflects the characteristics of the diversification of the strategic model. America's East Asia policy after the Cold War reflects the combination of multi-strategic models. After the Cold War, the United States lost a clear strategic opponent, thus, the search for potential strategic opponents became the main goal of the United States. East Asia is one of the fastest growing regions in the world since the end of World War II. China is becoming the main force in East Asia because of its vast territory, large population and the reform and opening policy implemented in recent years. The rising China has become the primary potential adversary of the United States, and the containment of China's rise has become the main goal of America's East Asia strategy. Around this goal, the United States has made a series of strategic adjustments in East Asia. As a result, the American East Asia policy has had an important impact on the development of East Asia. This paper analyzes the theoretical basis of American East Asia policy after the Cold War, combs the context of American East Asia policy, briefly introduces the development experience of Sino-US relations, and forecasts the prospect of American East Asia policy.
【學位授予單位】：湖北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D871.2
本文編號：2175238
[Abstract]:East Asia, because of its special position, has always been concerned by the world. With the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, the pattern of Northeast Asia has also changed greatly. The nuclear issue of the peninsula, the peaceful rise of China, the Taiwan Strait issue and the East China Sea issue between China and Japan have made the region constantly changing. The September 11 incident, which took place in 2001, changed the whole world and challenged the existing US Asia-Pacific strategy: the US-Japan alliance has undergone new changes. Japan, which has been revising its pacifist constitution, is also stepping up its goal of a normalised nation. Bush's unilateralist strategy and years of war in Afghanistan, Iraq and the global financial turmoil that broke out in late 2008 have affected American power to a certain extent, and American national interests have been constantly challenged. After the Cold War, American leaders of all ages are constantly adjusting their policies in East Asia. This policy adjustment is closely related to the US global strategy and its East Asia strategy. For a long time, idealism has been in the guiding position of American diplomatic strategy. After the end of the Cold War, the neoconservatism in the United States rose, which made the strategy of the United States influenced by a variety of ideas and produced a variety of strategic models. The policy of the United States reflects the characteristics of the diversification of the strategic model. America's East Asia policy after the Cold War reflects the combination of multi-strategic models. After the Cold War, the United States lost a clear strategic opponent, thus, the search for potential strategic opponents became the main goal of the United States. East Asia is one of the fastest growing regions in the world since the end of World War II. China is becoming the main force in East Asia because of its vast territory, large population and the reform and opening policy implemented in recent years. The rising China has become the primary potential adversary of the United States, and the containment of China's rise has become the main goal of America's East Asia strategy. Around this goal, the United States has made a series of strategic adjustments in East Asia. As a result, the American East Asia policy has had an important impact on the development of East Asia. This paper analyzes the theoretical basis of American East Asia policy after the Cold War, combs the context of American East Asia policy, briefly introduces the development experience of Sino-US relations, and forecasts the prospect of American East Asia policy.
【學位授予單位】：湖北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D871.2
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李曄,張楊;“離岸平衡手”與遏制中國——兼論美國東亞安全戰(zhàn)略下的西藏政策[J];東北師大學報;2005年02期
2 李慶四;;美國與東北亞地區(qū)安全:困境、動因及影響[J];東北亞論壇;2009年01期
3 巴殿君;;東北亞區(qū)域經(jīng)濟合作的政治環(huán)境[J];東北亞論壇;2009年04期
4 巴殿君;;論東北亞區(qū)域制度化合作的外部干預與內(nèi)部制約[J];東北亞論壇;2010年04期
5 朱鋒;;“區(qū)域性”特征與東亞安全研究[J];當代亞太;2008年02期
6 吳心伯;論美國亞太安全戰(zhàn)略的走向[J];復旦學報(社會科學版);2005年02期
7 譚再文;;美國式國際秩序與東北亞安全結(jié)構(gòu)[J];國際觀察;2006年03期
8 崔日明;李兵;張楠;;韓美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定對東北亞區(qū)域經(jīng)濟合作的影響[J];國際經(jīng)濟合作;2008年01期
9 李要偉;冷戰(zhàn)后美國同盟政策考察[J];國際論壇;2003年02期
10 楊潔勉;美國的全球戰(zhàn)略和中國的戰(zhàn)略機遇期[J];國際問題研究;2003年02期
，本文編號：2175238
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/waijiao/2175238.html
最近更新
教材專著
