本文選題：南海 + 南海爭端　； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 南海問題是指中國與東南亞地區(qū)的越南、菲律賓、馬來西亞、文萊等國圍繞南沙群島的島嶼和領(lǐng)海、大陸架和專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)的主權(quán)劃分而引起的國家間的主權(quán)爭端,包括領(lǐng)土和海洋劃界所有權(quán)兩個內(nèi)容。南海爭端起源于20世紀(jì)60年代末70年代初,雖然從產(chǎn)生至今也就四十多年的事情,但是因其特殊的地理位置和資源優(yōu)勢,及其外部勢力的長期介入,使得南海問題一直處于緊張狀態(tài)。盡管中國與周邊國家就南海問題進(jìn)行了反復(fù)的磋商,并就關(guān)鍵性問題達(dá)成共識,但是南海爭端仍未平息,中國提出的“擱置爭議,共同開發(fā)”舉措也并沒有得到最有效的發(fā)揮。 本研究以南海問題為研究對象,試圖從引起南海爭端的深層次原因中尋找解決方案。南海問題事關(guān)中國的國家安全,這其中主要包括貿(mào)易安全和國防安全。本文包括導(dǎo)言,共有5個部分的內(nèi)容,具體內(nèi)容如下： 導(dǎo)言主要對本研究的選題意義、南海問題的國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀以及理論與方法等進(jìn)行了簡要闡述,導(dǎo)言部分是本研究的理論基礎(chǔ)部分。 第一部分考察和分析了南海的緣起與中國海洋主權(quán)史。首先分析引起南海爭端的主要原因,從島礁歸屬之爭、海域劃界的爭端、資源的爭奪等三個方面因素展開討論。其次從不同時代的角度出發(fā)探討中國在南海地區(qū)的管轄狀況,通過分析可以發(fā)現(xiàn)中國是最早發(fā)現(xiàn)、開發(fā)和經(jīng)營南海諸島的國家,早在秦朝時期就對海疆進(jìn)行控制,奠定了中國海權(quán)的雛形。雖然經(jīng)歷了政權(quán)的更替,但是中國歷代政府對南部海疆的管轄一直沒有拋棄,中國對南海地區(qū)擁有無可爭辯的主權(quán)。 第二部分是對南海問題與國防安全問題展開探討。南海是中國的南大門,是我國東南沿海國防安全的海防前沿,南海以其特殊的地理位置成為中國通向世界的走廊,南海的安全與穩(wěn)定關(guān)系著中國的和平發(fā)展和國家安全。如果中國能恢復(fù)對南沙群島和海洋法南中國的戰(zhàn)略緩沖地帶的主權(quán),它將使中國在南延伸到幾百海里區(qū)域的深度防御策略的,這對中國東南沿海經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展,以維持該地區(qū)的安全具有重要的現(xiàn)實意義 第三部分從南海問題的經(jīng)濟(jì)安全的角度去闡述南海之于中國的重要戰(zhàn)略意義。南海是中國國家安全的南大門,南海自古以來就是東西方交流的主要通道,在國際海洋交通上,它是西歐-中東-遠(yuǎn)東海運(yùn)航線的重要組成部分,是我國聯(lián)系東南亞、南亞、西亞、非洲及歐洲的必經(jīng)之地。因此,南海是中國的重要貿(mào)易通道,是第二個波斯灣。 第四部分對解決南海爭端所需遵循的原則及其未來南海問題的解決策略進(jìn)行了探討。首先從三個方面闡述中國對待南海問題需堅持的原則：南海屬于中國領(lǐng)土、主權(quán)不容置疑；以最大誠意繼續(xù)實行睦鄰、安鄰政策；堅持“擱置爭議,共同開發(fā)”的原則。針對南海問題現(xiàn)狀,本文提出了三條處理南海問題的策略性建議：第一,繼續(xù)“立德”：和平外交、睦鄰?fù)饨�、互利共贏；第二,彌補(bǔ)“立威”不足：加強(qiáng)海軍投放能力、強(qiáng)軍計劃、國防與經(jīng)濟(jì)同步發(fā)展；第三,利用國際舞臺,制衡西方大國的介入。 最后部分是結(jié)束語,對全文內(nèi)容進(jìn)行概括和總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:The South China Sea issue refers to the sovereignty disputes over the islands and territorial waters of the Spratly Islands, the continental shelf and the exclusive economic zone in Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei, including the two contents of territorial and maritime delimitation ownership. The South China Sea dispute originated in the late 1960s and 70 years. At the beginning of the generation, the South China Sea has been in a state of tension because of its special geographical position and resource advantages and the long-term intervention of its external forces. Although China and the surrounding countries have conducted repeated discussions on the South China Sea issue and reached consensus on the key issues, the South China Sea contention has been made. China's proposed "shelving disputes and joint development" has not been brought into full play.
This study, taking the South China Sea as the research object, tries to find a solution to the deep cause of the South China Sea dispute. The South China Sea issue is related to the national security of China, including trade security and national defense security. This article includes the introduction, with a total of 5 parts. The contents are as follows:
The introduction is mainly about the significance of this study, the present situation at home and abroad in the South China Sea and the theory and method, and the introduction is the theoretical basis of this study.
The first part examines and analyzes the origin of the South China Sea and the history of China's maritime sovereignty. First, it analyzes the main causes of the South China Sea dispute, and discusses the three factors, such as the dispute over the islands and reefs, the dispute over the delimitation of the sea area, and the contention of the resources. Secondly, from the perspective of different times, the jurisdiction of China in the South China Sea is discussed. It can be found that China is the earliest discovery, the development and operation of the South China Sea Islands, the control of the sea area in the period of the Qin Dynasty, which laid the embryonic form of the Chinese sea power. Although the regime has changed, the Chinese government has not abandoned the jurisdiction of the Southern sea area, and China has indisputable sovereignty over the South China Sea area.
The second part is to discuss the issue of the South China Sea and the security of national defense. The South China Sea is the South Gate of China and the frontier of defense security in the southeast coast of China. The South China Sea has become the corridor to the world with its special geographical position. The security and stability of the South China Sea is related to the peaceful development of China and the national security. If China can restore it, the South China Sea can be restored to the national security. The sovereignty of Spratly Islands and the strategic buffer zone of China in the south of the sea will extend China's deep defense strategy from south to several hundred sea areas, which is of great practical significance to the economic development of the southeast coast of China, in order to maintain the security of the region.
The third part expounds the important strategic significance of the South China Sea in China from the perspective of the economic security of the South China Sea. The South China Sea is the South Gate of China's national security. The South China Sea has been the main channel for the East and West exchanges since ancient times. In the international maritime traffic, it is an important part of Western Europe, the Middle East and the Far East China Sea. It is the link between China and the East. South Asia, South Asia, West Asia, Africa and Europe are the necessary places. Therefore, the South China Sea is an important trade channel for China and is the second Persian Gulf.
The fourth part discusses the principles to be followed for the settlement of the South China Sea dispute and the solution strategy of the South China Sea in the future. First, it expounds the principle that China needs to adhere to the South China Sea issue from three aspects: the South China Sea belongs to the Chinese territory, and the sovereignty is unquestionable; the policy of good neighbourliness and neighbourhood should be continued with the greatest sincerity; According to the present situation of the South China Sea, this paper puts forward three strategic suggestions to deal with the South China Sea problems: first, to continue the "Lide": peaceful diplomacy, good neighborly diplomacy, mutual benefit and win-win situation; second, to make up for the shortage of "Liwei": strengthen the naval launch capacity, the strong army plan, the national defense and economy development synchronously; third, utilize the country. The stage is the intervention of the Western powers.
The last part is the concluding remarks, summarizing and summarizing the contents of the full text.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D822.3

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 劉麗華;從“南海問題”看美國東亞政策[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年

2 李新建;中越南海博弈的動態(tài)過程分析[D];華東師范大學(xué);2012年

3 邵先成;認(rèn)知理論視角下的中國南海問題研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：2091345