本文選題：體系文化 + 個(gè)體文化��； 參考：《外交學(xué)院》2011年博士論文

【摘要】：本文以文化為切入口研究中美關(guān)系。與一般意義上的“文化”研究不同,國(guó)際關(guān)系中的文化既有宏觀層面的體系文化,也有微觀層面的個(gè)體文化。從文化的內(nèi)容看,既有體現(xiàn)習(xí)俗、偏好、傳統(tǒng)等社會(huì)內(nèi)容的文化,也有反映意識(shí)形態(tài)、價(jià)值觀等政治內(nèi)容的文化。無(wú)論體系文化,還是個(gè)體文化,無(wú)論文化的社會(huì)內(nèi)容,還是政治內(nèi)容,都對(duì)中美產(chǎn)生影響,并通過(guò)兩個(gè)國(guó)家不同的世界觀、自我觀、他者觀反映出來(lái)。 中美個(gè)體文化有差異,清晰度、包容度、務(wù)實(shí)度不同,導(dǎo)致中美結(jié)構(gòu)性矛盾。這些矛盾反映在中美政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、安全政策上。通過(guò)分析文化對(duì)國(guó)家行為體產(chǎn)生影響的路徑可以發(fā)現(xiàn),文化通過(guò)建構(gòu)國(guó)家利益來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)影響。在建構(gòu)過(guò)程中,中美個(gè)體文化雖有差異,但也有相似點(diǎn),務(wù)實(shí)主義傾向就是其一。這一相似點(diǎn)在建構(gòu)利益過(guò)程中,能讓中美利益發(fā)生重疊。這為中美合作打下基礎(chǔ)。 中美個(gè)體文化有相似點(diǎn),并且通過(guò)互動(dòng)建構(gòu)共同利益,推動(dòng)兩個(gè)國(guó)家開(kāi)展合作。合作的成果繼而影響體系文化,反過(guò)來(lái)作用于個(gè)體。如果互動(dòng)是良性的,這種進(jìn)程將是正循環(huán)進(jìn)程,推動(dòng)文化建構(gòu)更多共同利益,為合作提供更穩(wěn)定勢(shì)頭。 在案例上,本文選擇了中美兩軍關(guān)系、亞太互動(dòng)、海上安全和氣候變化問(wèn)題。其中,兩軍關(guān)系、亞太互動(dòng)更多體現(xiàn)務(wù)實(shí)主義的文化相似點(diǎn)對(duì)建構(gòu)共同利益的作用。海上安全問(wèn)題則反映中美個(gè)體文化在特定領(lǐng)域的巨大差異導(dǎo)致互動(dòng)困難,繼而影響體系文化。氣候變化問(wèn)題更多表現(xiàn)對(duì)中美個(gè)體文化良好互動(dòng)的期待,因?yàn)?目前這個(gè)領(lǐng)域開(kāi)始顯現(xiàn)中美互動(dòng)推動(dòng)體系文化向積極方向發(fā)展的跡象。論文的結(jié)論是:中美個(gè)體文化差異雖大,但可以通過(guò)相似點(diǎn)建構(gòu)共同利益,推動(dòng)合作,并催生對(duì)雙方有利的體系文化。
[Abstract]:This paper takes culture as the entry point to study the relationship between China and the United States. Different from the study of "culture" in general sense, the culture in international relations has not only the system culture at the macro level, but also the individual culture at the micro level. From the point of view of culture, there is not only the culture of social content, such as custom, preference and tradition, but also the culture of political content such as ideology and values. No matter the system culture, the individual culture, the social content of the culture or the political content, all have the influence to China and the United States, and through the two countries' different world outlook, the self-view, the other view is reflected. The differences between Chinese and American individual cultures, clarity, tolerance and pragmatism lead to structural contradictions between China and the United States. These contradictions are reflected in the political, economic and security policies of China and the United States. By analyzing the influence of culture on national actors, it can be found that culture realizes influence by constructing national interests. In the process of construction, although there are differences between Chinese and American individual cultures, there are also similarities, and pragmatism is one of them. This similarity can overlap the interests of China and the United States in the process of constructing interests. This lays the foundation for the cooperation between China and the United States. Chinese and American individual cultures share similarities and promote cooperation between the two countries through interaction to build common interests. The fruits of cooperation in turn affect the culture of the system, which in turn affects the individual. If the interaction is benign, this process will be a positive cycle, promote cultural construction of more common interests, and provide a more stable momentum for cooperation. In the case, this paper chooses the military relationship, Asia-Pacific interaction, maritime security and climate change issues. Among them, the relationship between the two armed forces, Asia-Pacific interaction more reflect pragmatic cultural similarities in the construction of common interests. The maritime safety problem reflects the great differences between Chinese and American individual cultures in specific fields, which leads to the difficulty of interaction and then influences the system culture. Climate change issues are more likely to look forward to good interaction between individual cultures in China and the United States, as this area is beginning to show signs of moving the system culture in a positive direction. The conclusion of the paper is that although the differences of individual culture between China and the United States are great, they can construct common interests through similarities, promote cooperation, and give birth to the beneficial system culture for both sides.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D822.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐寧;美國(guó)東亞安全戰(zhàn)略態(tài)勢(shì)、變化及啟示——析九八年美國(guó)國(guó)防部《東亞太平洋安全戰(zhàn)略報(bào)告》[J];國(guó)際展望;1998年24期

2 趙福琪;;中西方群體取向和個(gè)人主義取向價(jià)值觀探析[J];菏澤學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

3 康曉;;利益認(rèn)知與國(guó)際規(guī)范的國(guó)內(nèi)化——以中國(guó)對(duì)國(guó)際氣候合作規(guī)范的內(nèi)化為例[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治;2010年01期

4 馮紹雷;;冷戰(zhàn)后的國(guó)際預(yù)測(cè)研究:觀點(diǎn)、特征與問(wèn)題[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治;2010年03期

5 王瑋;;國(guó)際制度與新進(jìn)入國(guó)家的相互合法化[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治;2010年03期

6 龐中英;;效果不彰的多邊主義和國(guó)際領(lǐng)導(dǎo)赤字——兼論中國(guó)在國(guó)際集體行動(dòng)中的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)責(zé)任[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治;2010年06期

7 屈從文;;中國(guó)人與主權(quán)觀念:從被迫接受到主動(dòng)建構(gòu)[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治;2010年06期

8 王逸舟;“國(guó)際規(guī)則”理論及其啟示──再說(shuō)《權(quán)力與相互依賴》書[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治;1995年03期

9 李小芬;20世紀(jì)以前美國(guó)個(gè)人主義的歷史演變[J];廈門大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年05期

10 王逸舟;國(guó)家利益再思考[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2002年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 鄒驥 陳吉寧 張俊杰 王燦 艾寧 齊小凡;[N];中國(guó)環(huán)境報(bào);2001年

，

本文編號(hào)：2079746