本文選題：柬埔寨 + 東盟　； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 本文的主要觀點(diǎn)關(guān)注于成就、挑戰(zhàn)和對(duì)前景的展望。這篇論文將會(huì)分析柬埔寨作為東盟成員在10年來(lái)所獲得的收益,以及其相應(yīng)所面臨的挑戰(zhàn)。最后本文將對(duì)柬埔寨以及東盟的前景作出展望。 除了介紹性的部分以外,本文基本上可以被分為三個(gè)章節(jié): 第一章:區(qū)域主義:理論框架與應(yīng)用 本章主要致力于指出可以解釋柬埔寨—東盟關(guān)系的基本理論框架。正如我們所知道的那樣,區(qū)域主義使全世界各地區(qū)的人們比以往更加緊密地聯(lián)系在一起。某個(gè)地區(qū)的商品和服務(wù)在全球日益通行。區(qū)域主義的跡象可以在經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化、社會(huì)、政治等多個(gè)層面被感知。在另一角度上,區(qū)域主義描繪了這樣一種情景:存有各種認(rèn)同的不同宗教和種族群體共存于幾個(gè)國(guó)家內(nèi),而且這幾國(guó)都集中在一個(gè)特定的區(qū)域內(nèi),有著某種程度上強(qiáng)烈的廣泛認(rèn)同感。通常情況下,這會(huì)涉及到幾個(gè)種族群體,他們要求獨(dú)立并發(fā)展自己的政治力量。 另外,如果我們將區(qū)域主義和區(qū)域化這兩個(gè)概念相對(duì)比,我們就可以發(fā)現(xiàn)這兩個(gè)理論是如何在柬埔寨與東盟的例子中生效的。區(qū)域主義和區(qū)域化在不同層面上與彼此相區(qū)別。某個(gè)地區(qū)是在區(qū)域主義的框架內(nèi)通過(guò)區(qū)域化來(lái)塑造經(jīng)濟(jì)和政治的發(fā)展過(guò)程。區(qū)域化在地域?qū)用婷枥L了趨于經(jīng)濟(jì)國(guó)際化的過(guò)程。柬埔寨加入東盟經(jīng)歷了長(zhǎng)期的過(guò)程,作為1999年加入東盟的最年輕的國(guó)家,它被接受為區(qū)域組織(ASEAN-10)的全天候成員。柬埔寨在政治和經(jīng)濟(jì)方面融入東盟的過(guò)程也部分的反映了東盟的區(qū)域化進(jìn)程。 第二章:成就與挑戰(zhàn) 作為東盟的成員國(guó),柬埔寨最近十年來(lái)在經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治和文化方面都受益匪淺。柬埔寨與東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)之間的經(jīng)濟(jì)整合與合作在很大程度上促進(jìn)了本國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)步入健康軌道。柬埔寨的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展速度是令人矚目的,在過(guò)去的十年里以平均9.4%的速度保持增長(zhǎng),并在2007年使增幅達(dá)到了10.2%。這也令貧困率以每年一個(gè)百分點(diǎn)的速率遞減,從1994年的47%降到了2007年的30%。法制改革以及為加入東盟所作的準(zhǔn)備工作使得柬埔寨對(duì)于通過(guò)WTO來(lái)融入世界市場(chǎng)的途徑更加熟悉和富于經(jīng)驗(yàn),柬埔寨于是在2004年10月13日加入了WTO,最終成為世界貿(mào)易大家庭中的一員。 東盟的區(qū)域主義也幫助柬埔寨提升了在國(guó)際舞臺(tái)上的影響。考慮到國(guó)家安全,我們可以看到東盟在柬埔寨與它國(guó)的關(guān)系方面為其創(chuàng)造了一個(gè)有利于和平與發(fā)展的穩(wěn)定環(huán)境。在很大程度上,柬埔寨對(duì)加入東盟后的發(fā)展期望都已經(jīng)達(dá)到。柬埔寨在和平與穩(wěn)定之余也享受到了經(jīng)濟(jì)快速發(fā)展的成果。區(qū)域內(nèi)的貿(mào)易與投資都有了可喜的發(fā)展。在區(qū)域內(nèi)和國(guó)際上柬埔寨的良好形象已經(jīng)被勾勒出來(lái),柬埔寨的聲音也出現(xiàn)在了區(qū)域和國(guó)際的舞臺(tái)上。通過(guò)東盟,柬埔寨可以與東南亞和世界上不同的國(guó)家發(fā)展和鞏固雙邊關(guān)系。 此外,柬埔寨致力于進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)與東盟各國(guó)的合作,并在外交、貿(mào)易等領(lǐng)域鞏固與東盟、東盟+3、東盟+3+3(東盟+6)以及歐盟各成員國(guó)的伙伴關(guān)系。如今東盟與美國(guó)的合作正步入一個(gè)非常良好的階段,雙方協(xié)商建立東盟—美國(guó)自由貿(mào)易區(qū)。柬埔寨在東盟的各項(xiàng)事務(wù)中都扮演著十分積極和活躍的角色。 然而,柬埔寨在通過(guò)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)整合來(lái)與其他成員國(guó)享受同等份額的目標(biāo)上還面臨著許多大的挑戰(zhàn)�？s小發(fā)展差距是實(shí)現(xiàn)東盟完全整合的首要步驟。另外,維持國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展也是保證柬埔寨與別國(guó)在國(guó)際舞臺(tái)上公平競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的關(guān)鍵因素。為與其他東盟國(guó)家在經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域競(jìng)爭(zhēng),柬埔寨必須集中力量發(fā)展出口并增加就業(yè)。 邊境沖突是另一個(gè)重大的挑戰(zhàn)。泰國(guó)與柬埔寨之間的沖突不僅僅影響了兩國(guó)的雙邊關(guān)系,更對(duì)東盟在不同領(lǐng)域如政治、安全、經(jīng)濟(jì)等方面都帶來(lái)了消極的影響。泰柬兩國(guó)的邊境沖突提醒我們東盟應(yīng)該有一個(gè)經(jīng)授權(quán)的、獨(dú)立于各成員國(guó)的安全爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制,以此來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)東盟2015年展望中所期待的區(qū)域安全目標(biāo)。 第三章:柬埔寨在東盟框架內(nèi)的未來(lái)前景 不管怎樣,在解決馬來(lái)西亞和菲律賓對(duì)于沙巴州的爭(zhēng)議這個(gè)問(wèn)題上,東盟的外交政策的確取得了成功;但在解決現(xiàn)在的兩個(gè)東盟成員國(guó)柬埔寨和泰國(guó)的邊境爭(zhēng)端問(wèn)題上,它的確沒(méi)什么建樹(shù)。更重要的是,東盟沒(méi)能阻止這兩國(guó)將爭(zhēng)端逐步升級(jí)為武裝沖突。這場(chǎng)沖突使該地區(qū)的相關(guān)政黨和國(guó)家對(duì)其結(jié)果表示了深深的關(guān)切和憂慮。 泰柬兩國(guó)的邊境沖突提醒我們東盟應(yīng)該有一個(gè)經(jīng)授權(quán)的、獨(dú)立于各成員國(guó)的安全爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制,以此來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)東盟2015年展望中所期待的區(qū)域安全目標(biāo),也許東盟秘書長(zhǎng)將是這項(xiàng)任務(wù)的一個(gè)恰當(dāng)人選。然而,這個(gè)目標(biāo)并不是容易達(dá)到的,東盟大多數(shù)國(guó)家由精英領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人所領(lǐng)導(dǎo),他們不愿為了東盟而放棄自己的權(quán)利。解決這個(gè)問(wèn)題的唯一途徑是通過(guò)規(guī)章加快東盟的民主化,這些規(guī)章必須要放映東盟人民的意志,并鼓勵(lì)其參與東盟的決策制定。 最后,在東盟的群體里面,柬埔寨擁有自己的目標(biāo)、計(jì)劃,并為一個(gè)光輝的明天而不懈努力。由于柬埔寨是一個(gè)較小的、在自然資源和技術(shù)方面都有所欠缺的不發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家,它在東盟的決策中也許無(wú)法扮演重要的角色,但柬埔寨可以積極的向其它東盟成員國(guó)學(xué)習(xí)。柬埔寨應(yīng)盡力去保證對(duì)其它東盟成員國(guó)的承諾,并制定宏觀的戰(zhàn)略和清晰的規(guī)劃。
[Abstract]:The main points of this article are focused on achievements, challenges and prospects. This paper will analyze the gains made by Kampuchea as a member of ASEAN in 10 years and the challenges it faces. Finally, this paper will look forward to the prospects of Kampuchea and ASEAN.
In addition to the introductory part, this article can be basically divided into three chapters:
Chapter one: Regionalism: theoretical framework and Application
This chapter focuses on explaining the basic theoretical framework for the interpretation of the Kampuchea ASEAN relationship. As we know, regionalism makes people around the world more closely linked than ever. The commodities and services in a certain region are increasingly popular around the world. The signs of regionalism can be in the economy, culture, and society. On the other hand, regionalism depicts such a scenario: there are various religions and ethnic groups that agree with each other in several countries, and these countries are concentrated in a particular area, with a strong sense of widespread identity. In general, this involves a few. Ethnic groups demand independence and develop their political strength.
In addition, if we compare the two concepts of regionalism and regionalization, we can find out how these two theories come into force in the examples of Kampuchea and ASEAN. Regionalism and regionalization are different from each other at different levels. One region is shaping economy and politics through regionalization within the framework of regionalism. The process of regional development. Regionalization depicts the process of economic internationalization at the regional level. Kampuchea's accession to ASEAN has undergone a long process, as the youngest member of the ASEAN countries in 1999, which has been accepted as an all-weather member of the regional organization (ASEAN-10). The process of Kampuchea's integration into the political and economic aspects of ASEAN is also part of the process. It reflects the regionalization process of ASEAN.
The second chapter: achievements and challenges
As a member of ASEAN, Kampuchea has benefited greatly in the last ten years in the economic, political and cultural aspects. The economic integration and cooperation between Kampuchea and the ASEAN Free Trade Area has greatly promoted the national economy into a healthy track. The economic development of Kampuchea is remarkable, with an average of 9.4 over the past ten years. The rate of growth was increased and the increase reached 10.2%. in 2007, which also reduced the rate of poverty by one percentage point per year, from 47% in 1994 to the 30%. rule of law reform in 2007 and the preparation work for ASEAN to make Kampuchea more familiar and experienced in the way of integrating the world market through WTO. Kampuchea joined WTO in October 13, 2004 and eventually became a member of the world trade family.
The regionalism of ASEAN has also helped Kampuchea improve its impact on the international stage. Considering national security, we can see that ASEAN has created a stable environment conducive to peace and development in Kampuchea's relations with its countries. To a large extent, Kampuchea has already reached its development expectations after joining ASEAN. At the rest of peace and stability, the village enjoyed the results of rapid economic development. Both trade and investment in the region have developed very well. The good image of Kampuchea in the region and in the world has been outlined, and the voice of Kampuchea has also appeared on the regional and international stage. Through ASEAN, Kampuchea can be in Southeast Asia and in Southeast Asia. Different countries in the world develop and consolidate bilateral relations.
In addition, Kampuchea is committed to further strengthening cooperation with ASEAN countries, and consolidating the partnership with ASEAN, ASEAN +3, ASEAN +3+3 (ASEAN +6) and the EU member countries in foreign and trade areas. Now the cooperation between ASEAN and the United States is stepping into a very good step, and the two sides negotiate the ASEAN us free trade zone. Pu has played a very active and active role in all aspects of ASEAN's affairs.
However, Kampuchea faces many big challenges in achieving the same share of the same share with other member countries through regional economic integration. Narrowing the development gap is the first step to realize the complete integration of ASEAN. In addition, maintaining the national economic development is also the key factor to ensure the fair competition between Kampuchea and other countries on the international stage. Other ASEAN countries are competing in the economic sphere. Kampuchea must concentrate its efforts on developing exports and increasing employment.
The border conflict is another major challenge. The conflict between Thailand and Kampuchea has not only affected the bilateral relations between the two countries, but also has a negative impact on ASEAN in various fields such as politics, security and economy. The border conflict between the two countries reminds us that ASEAN should have a authorized and independent member state. The security dispute settlement mechanism aims to achieve the regional security goals expected by ASEAN in the 2015 outlook.
The third chapter: Kampuchea's future prospects in ASEAN Framework.
In any case, ASEAN's foreign policy has indeed been successful in resolving the dispute between Malaysia and Philippines on Sabah, but it does not make any contribution to the settlement of the border dispute between the two ASEAN members, Kampuchea and Thailand. Escalation into armed conflict has caused deep concern and concern to the relevant parties and countries in the region about their results.
The border conflict between the Thai and Cambodian countries is a reminder that ASEAN should have an authorized and independent security dispute settlement mechanism that is independent of all Member States in order to achieve the regional security goals expected in the ASEAN outlook for 2015, and perhaps the ASEAN secretary general will be an appropriate choice for this task. However, this goal is not easy to achieve. Most countries are led by elite leaders who do not want to give up their rights for ASEAN. The only way to solve this problem is to speed up the democratization of ASEAN through rules and regulations. These regulations must show the will of the ASEAN people and encourage them to participate in the decision making of ASEAN.
Finally, in the ASEAN group, Kampuchea has its own goals, plans, and unremitting efforts for a glorious tomorrow. Because Kampuchea is a smaller, less developed country with a lack of natural resources and technology, it may not play an important role in ASEAN's decision-making, but Kampuchea can actively move towards it. Other ASEAN member countries should learn from it. Kampuchea should make every effort to ensure its commitment to other ASEAN Member States and formulate macro strategies and clear plans.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D833.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉小龍;;東盟國(guó)家發(fā)展旅游業(yè)的政策措施[J];亞非縱橫;1996年02期

2 周勁松;東盟國(guó)家有關(guān)口腔護(hù)理用品的管理法規(guī)[J];牙膏工業(yè);2001年03期

3 本刊編輯部;;富裕東盟 富裕廣西[J];今日南國(guó);2007年11期

4 于如;;東盟國(guó)家的警鈴[J];世界知識(shí);1979年04期

5 中內(nèi)恒夫;汪慕恒;;東盟國(guó)家的貿(mào)易不平衡問(wèn)題[J];南洋資料譯叢;1983年01期

6 納谷誠(chéng)二;趙文騮;;東盟國(guó)家的投資氣侯[J];南洋資料譯叢;1986年01期

7 林伍s，

本文編號(hào)：1988625