發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-16 09:21

  本文選題：美日同盟 + 調(diào)整強(qiáng)化��； 參考：《遼寧大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：二戰(zhàn)結(jié)束以后,美國(guó)為了自身國(guó)家利益的需要,以及東北亞區(qū)域的安全形勢(shì),選擇了與日本單獨(dú)媾和,并且為了執(zhí)行其東北亞安全戰(zhàn)略,美國(guó)選擇了與日本全面結(jié)盟。在美日同盟內(nèi)部,美日兩國(guó)關(guān)系由于各自國(guó)內(nèi)政治、對(duì)外戰(zhàn)略以及東北亞安全環(huán)境等因素的調(diào)整變化而不斷調(diào)整其戰(zhàn)略方向,并對(duì)東北亞安全環(huán)境有著深刻的影響。在冷戰(zhàn)中,美日同盟的存在針對(duì)防范蘇聯(lián)在東北亞擴(kuò)張的威脅以及通過(guò)對(duì)日提供安全保障來(lái)限制日本軍事實(shí)力的發(fā)展。冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束以后,美日同盟也經(jīng)過(guò)短暫的“漂流”后,隨機(jī)找到了新的同盟戰(zhàn)略方向。不僅強(qiáng)化了美日同盟的戰(zhàn)略層次、擴(kuò)大了美日同盟的防務(wù)范圍,更是積極的追求東北亞區(qū)域安全的主導(dǎo)權(quán)。“9·11”之后的美日同盟借由反恐之名,不斷加強(qiáng)化同盟的外向性,美日同盟干涉領(lǐng)域不斷擴(kuò)大。 美日同盟的強(qiáng)化在穩(wěn)定東北亞安全環(huán)境的層面上雖然起到了一定的積極作用,但是更多的是對(duì)現(xiàn)有的東北亞的安全模式造成了很大的沖擊,帶來(lái)了很大不穩(wěn)定與威脅因素。首先,美日同盟的不斷調(diào)整強(qiáng)化,特別是極大的強(qiáng)化了美日同盟的軍事威脅性、針對(duì)性與壓迫性,打破了現(xiàn)有的地區(qū)實(shí)力平衡,并激化了朝核問(wèn)題的升級(jí),給地區(qū)安全帶來(lái)了極大的不穩(wěn)定。其次,美日同盟的調(diào)整強(qiáng)化不僅沒(méi)有推進(jìn)東北亞區(qū)域一體化的進(jìn)程,反而成為東北亞地區(qū)各國(guó)加強(qiáng)政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)合作、一體化的主要障礙。最后,美日同盟不斷的強(qiáng)化擠壓地區(qū)大國(guó)發(fā)展空間與安全環(huán)境的壓迫力,增加了誘發(fā)沖突的可能性。 綜上所述,美日同盟作為整體單位要素,其變化調(diào)整直接影響其所屬的東北亞的安全環(huán)境,雙方同時(shí)又互為單位要素,共為國(guó)際體系中的單位變量。因此,加強(qiáng)研究美日同盟調(diào)整變化及其戰(zhàn)略走向?qū)|北亞安全環(huán)境,乃至對(duì)國(guó)際體系的影響有著重要的意義。通過(guò)歷史和實(shí)證的結(jié)合,對(duì)分析區(qū)域安全環(huán)境,提供國(guó)家發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略,預(yù)判國(guó)際形勢(shì)也有深遠(yuǎn)意義。
[Abstract]:After World War II, the United States chose to make peace with Japan alone for the sake of its own national interests and the security situation in Northeast Asia, and in order to carry out its Northeast Asia security strategy, the United States chose an all-around alliance with Japan. Within the US-Japan alliance, the relationship between the United States and Japan constantly adjusts its strategic direction because of the adjustment and changes of their domestic politics, foreign strategy and security environment in Northeast Asia, and has a profound impact on the security environment in Northeast Asia. During the Cold War, the existence of the US-Japan alliance was aimed at preventing the threat of Soviet expansion in Northeast Asia and limiting the development of Japan's military power by providing security guarantees to Japan. After the end of the Cold War, the American-Japanese alliance, after a brief drift, randomly found a new strategic direction of the alliance. It not only strengthens the strategic level of the US-Japan alliance and expands the defense scope of the US-Japan alliance, but also actively pursues the leading power of regional security in Northeast Asia. The US-Japan alliance after "9 / 11" has continuously strengthened the extroversion of the alliance in the name of anti-terrorism. The area of intervention by the US-Japan alliance continues to expand. Although the strengthening of the US-Japan alliance has played a positive role in stabilizing the security environment in Northeast Asia, it has caused a great impact on the existing security model in Northeast Asia and brought about a great deal of instability and threat factors. First, the continuous readjustment and strengthening of the US-Japan alliance, especially the military threat, pertinence and oppression of the US-Japan alliance, have broken the existing balance of regional power and intensified the escalation of the North Korean nuclear issue. It has brought great instability to regional security. Secondly, the adjustment and strengthening of the US-Japan alliance not only did not promote the process of regional integration in Northeast Asia, but also became the main obstacle for the countries in Northeast Asia to strengthen political, economic cooperation and integration. Finally, the American-Japanese alliance strengthens and compresses the oppressive force of regional powers to develop space and security environment, which increases the possibility of inducing conflict. To sum up, the change and adjustment of the US-Japan alliance, as a whole unit element, directly affects the security environment of Northeast Asia to which it belongs, and both sides are each other as unit elements, which are the unit variables in the international system. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the adjustment and change of US-Japan alliance and its strategic trend to the security environment of Northeast Asia and even to the international system. Through the combination of history and empirical evidence, it is of great significance to analyze the regional security environment, to provide the national development strategy and to predict the international situation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D871.2;D831.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 聶宏毅;肖鐵峰;;日美同盟的歷史演變及其對(duì)亞太安全的影響[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2007年08期

2 陳龍山;東北亞多邊安全合作機(jī)制淺議[J];當(dāng)代亞太;1997年02期

3 楊光;;冷戰(zhàn)后美日同盟的強(qiáng)化及其對(duì)東亞地區(qū)政治的影響[J];當(dāng)代世界社會(huì)主義問(wèn)題;2010年01期

4 黎宇;二十一世紀(jì)的中國(guó)與世界——“中國(guó)的發(fā)展與21世紀(jì)的國(guó)際格局”國(guó)際學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)綜述[J];國(guó)際政治研究;1998年03期

5 劉昌明;郭_g;;美國(guó)的不完全霸權(quán)與東亞地區(qū)秩序的轉(zhuǎn)型[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治論壇;2008年02期

6 楊魯慧,郭延軍;從“霸權(quán)穩(wěn)定論”到“安全共同體”——東北亞安全合作架構(gòu)新走向[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治;2005年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1896296