本文選題：中日敵意 + 中日歷史�。� 參考：《浙江大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：對(duì)于多數(shù)中國(guó)人,不論其他的起源或觀點(diǎn),日本侵略,日本的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)犯罪的否認(rèn),缺乏道歉,和其他的問題都還是一個(gè)討論的問題。在政客,史學(xué)家,學(xué)者和日本公民和中國(guó)公民之間有爭(zhēng)論。日方,仍有許多努力減少或否認(rèn)日本的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)犯罪。 這份論文說明,為了更好了解和估計(jì)今天的情況,日本和中國(guó)之間的雙邊關(guān)系應(yīng)該評(píng)估用歷史的角度。通過兩個(gè)國(guó)家的歷史和他們最重要的聯(lián)絡(luò),這份論文調(diào)查今天相互敵意的原因。從原因的分析這份論文出示未來外型。這個(gè)未來外型讓我們了解很重要的未來情況。 這個(gè)工作的歷史原始資料是日本課本、在日本官員之間會(huì)話的報(bào)告,證人日志和報(bào)紙的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)報(bào)告,日本和中國(guó)政府的官方信函和公告,而中國(guó)和日本歷史的書。 在兩個(gè)國(guó)家歷史的背景中有了效果支持而下傾中日敵意的原因。一方面中國(guó)給許多聯(lián)系的可能性,但是中國(guó)政府作出了很少的努力為了阻止民族主義感覺成長(zhǎng)在中國(guó)公民之中。從日本角度和看待中國(guó)的歷史這導(dǎo)致了更加敵對(duì)的緊張。 日方表示了歉意,但是中國(guó)官員和民眾的多數(shù)沒贊賞。而且日本償還的,沒滿意北京。不僅皇帝為它的罪行未曾被指責(zé),而且日本的小贖罪永不關(guān)1894日本占領(lǐng)或者南京大屠殺的傷口。 最后兩個(gè)國(guó)家互相的意圖和態(tài)度都沒有明確,因此引導(dǎo)更遠(yuǎn)緊張的這種一再導(dǎo)致的新的誤解。 結(jié)論為中國(guó)提供侵略的日本的歷史可能不再是避免的借口維護(hù)國(guó)際穩(wěn)定的負(fù)擔(dān),兩者都不抗議反對(duì)一個(gè)擴(kuò)展日本角色。日本對(duì)它穩(wěn)定的政治和社會(huì)的信用和尊敬值得。并且中國(guó)應(yīng)受繼續(xù)的信譽(yù)能獲得在經(jīng)濟(jì)政治的領(lǐng)域的進(jìn)展。兩個(gè)國(guó)家必須說實(shí)話跟彼此,必須沒有友誼幻覺,但是必須以真正的自愿建立根據(jù)共同利益合作。此外,中國(guó)和日本應(yīng)該有新的視覺和決心去除是強(qiáng)的民族主義神話和促進(jìn)共有的歷史通過相互批評(píng)和反射。在這份論文是顯示出,強(qiáng)的民族主義將冷凍機(jī)會(huì)有一新的正面中日聯(lián)系�？偠灾�,這份論文也爭(zhēng)辯說,這爭(zhēng)執(zhí)是易處理的,只要二個(gè)政府了解公開敵對(duì)不是任一個(gè)國(guó)家的利益,并且強(qiáng)的合作是根本的。雖然在二個(gè)國(guó)家之間的一種最近沖突不是可預(yù)測(cè)的,兩個(gè)國(guó)家將采取的未來路線是未知的。它是希望象這份論文的工作貢獻(xiàn)往在越來越獲取在亞洲球形的重要性并且一個(gè)世界舞臺(tái)的兩個(gè)國(guó)家之中的一個(gè)平安和相互全面關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:For most Chinese, regardless of other origins or views, Japanese aggression, Japan's denial of war crimes, lack of apology, and other issues are still a matter of discussion. There are arguments between politicians, historians, scholars and Japanese and Chinese citizens. On the Japanese side, there are still many efforts to reduce or deny Japan's war crimes. In order to better understand and estimate today's situation, the bilateral relationship between Japan and China should be evaluated from a historical perspective, the paper said. Based on the history of the two countries and their most important contacts, this paper examines the reasons for today's hostility. Analyze the cause of this paper and present its future appearance. This future shape gives us an important picture of the future. The historical sources of this work are Japanese textbooks, reports on conversations between Japanese officials, witness logs and newspaper war reports, official letters and announcements from the Japanese and Chinese governments, and books on Chinese and Japanese history. In the context of the history of the two countries, there is the effect of backing down the hostility between China and Japan. On the one hand, China has offered many possibilities, but the Chinese government has done little to prevent nationalistic feelings from growing up among Chinese citizens. Looking at China's history from a Japanese point of view and looking at it has led to more hostile tensions. Japan apologized, but most Chinese officials and the public did not appreciate it. And Japan's repayment, not satisfied with Beijing. Not only was the emperor unaccused of his crimes, but Japan's little atonement never closed the wounds of 1894 Japanese occupation or the Nanjing Massacre. The last two countries have no clear intentions and attitudes towards each other, leading to new misunderstandings that lead to further tension. Conclusion the history of Japan, which provides aggression to China, may no longer be an excuse to avoid the burden of maintaining international stability, neither protesting against an expanded Japanese role. Japan deserves credit and respect for its stable politics and society. And China deserves continued credibility to make progress in economic and political fields. Two countries must be honest with each other, must have no illusion of friendship, but must establish cooperation on the basis of mutual interest on a genuine voluntary basis. In addition, China and Japan should have new vision and determination to remove myths that are strongly nationalist and promote shared history through mutual criticism and reflection. In this paper it is shown that strong nationalism will have a new positive relationship between China and Japan. All in all, the paper argues that the dispute is manageable as long as two governments understand that open hostility is not a national interest and that strong cooperation is fundamental. Although a recent conflict between two countries is not predictable, the future path they will take is unknown. It is hoped that work like this paper will contribute to a peaceful and comprehensive relationship between two countries in the growing importance of the Asian sphere and a world stage.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D822.3;D831.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 石其寶;;“肯定列表制度”對(duì)中日農(nóng)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易的影響[J];法治論叢(上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2008年01期

2 顧肖榮;;中日經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪概念和范圍的演進(jìn)[J];東方法學(xué);2008年01期

3 王若茜;;中日市民宗教意識(shí)的差異——以“浮世草子”和“三言二拍”為中心[J];東北亞論壇;2006年05期

4 汪毅剛;李穎;;論民族大義下的中日釣魚島問題[J];河北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年01期

5 周珊珊;從均勢(shì)角度談中日關(guān)系的走向[J];徐州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

6 管秀蘭;從生活習(xí)俗看中日文化差異[J];山東省青年管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

7 朱衛(wèi)新;中日茶文化的異同[J];東北亞論壇;1999年01期

8 ;中日椨，

本文編號(hào)：1830787