發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-27 02:08

  本文選題：身份 + 東亞��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國(guó)經(jīng)歷了經(jīng)濟(jì)的迅速發(fā)展,在國(guó)際政治中的地位也日漸提高。然而伴隨著種種可喜成就出現(xiàn)的是目前中國(guó)對(duì)自身的身份認(rèn)知缺失的問題。換言之,由于目前中國(guó)經(jīng)歷了其在國(guó)際政治中的地位的變換,對(duì)于“我們是誰(shuí)?”這樣的問題認(rèn)識(shí)的并不是特別的清楚,所以國(guó)內(nèi)外才會(huì)出現(xiàn)對(duì)于中國(guó)的戰(zhàn)略、立場(chǎng)和意圖等問題的爭(zhēng)論。毋庸置疑,冷戰(zhàn)期間“身份”對(duì)于世界上的絕大多數(shù)國(guó)家都不是一個(gè)難于回答的問題,尤其是對(duì)中國(guó)來(lái)說(shuō),這并不成為令人困擾的問題。但是冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束之后,蘇聯(lián)解體,隨著國(guó)際政治風(fēng)云際會(huì)的變化,這逐漸成為一個(gè)棘手的問題。本文的主要目的就是要回答在東亞地區(qū)社會(huì)中,中國(guó)是以一個(gè)什么樣的身份而存在著這個(gè)簡(jiǎn)單的問題。主要方法是從建構(gòu)主義對(duì)身份的分析入手來(lái)解決中國(guó)作為一個(gè)“自我”在東亞地區(qū)的身份應(yīng)該如何界定的問題。 本文在分析溫特的溫和建構(gòu)主義對(duì)“身份”這一概念的詮釋,以及其他相關(guān)的理論流派對(duì)這一概念內(nèi)涵理解的基礎(chǔ)上,首先分析了身份形成的理論。由于溫特在其《國(guó)際政治的社會(huì)理論》中提出了身份形成的兩種邏輯,即自然選擇和文化選擇。那么以此為基礎(chǔ),假設(shè)對(duì)國(guó)家身份形成的影響因素主要有：自我持有的觀念、他者持有的觀念。其中,這兩個(gè)方面又可以分別從物質(zhì)因素(自然選擇)和文化因素(文化選擇)兩方面考慮。這就是本文所提出自身的理論框架。通過(guò)這一理論框架,對(duì)冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束至今的這段時(shí)間內(nèi)中國(guó)在東亞的身份進(jìn)行分析。也就是根據(jù)本文所假設(shè)的分析框架,分析冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束后中國(guó)在東亞地區(qū)的身份主要是從中國(guó)自我持有的觀念和東亞的“他者”所持有的觀念兩個(gè)角度入手。而對(duì)著兩個(gè)問題的分析又是一個(gè)十分難于操作的問題。例如：如何去衡量和分析中國(guó)自我持有的觀念,或者說(shuō)中國(guó)的自我認(rèn)同?同樣我們可以把這個(gè)問題普遍化,那就變成了如何去分析一個(gè)國(guó)家的自我認(rèn)同?文章中提出了從物質(zhì)因素和文化因素兩方面去展開分析。另外,對(duì)他者持有的觀念的衡量也存在著同樣的問題。下文將緊密依據(jù)文章理論假設(shè)的框架進(jìn)行。 如何去驗(yàn)證本文根據(jù)自己的假設(shè)和理論框架所得出的結(jié)論也同樣是一個(gè)十分關(guān)鍵的問題。本文選取的角度是通過(guò)分析中國(guó)的對(duì)外政策來(lái)驗(yàn)證前文中對(duì)中國(guó)身份的定論是否正確。那么中國(guó)對(duì)外政策的分析又通過(guò)哪些渠道來(lái)解決呢?本文的最后部分將一一論述這些問題。
[Abstract]:China has experienced rapid economic development, and its position in international politics is increasing. However, with all kinds of gratifying achievements, there is a lack of identity cognition in China. In other words, because China has now gone through a change in its position in international politics, to "who are we?" Such issues are not particularly clear, so domestic and foreign disputes over China's strategy, position and intentions. There is no doubt that "identity" during the Cold War was not a difficult question for most countries in the world, especially for China. But after the end of the Cold War, the Soviet Union disintegrated, as the international political landscape changed, this gradually became a thorny problem. The main purpose of this paper is to answer the simple question of what kind of identity China is in East Asian society. The main method is to solve the problem of how to define China's identity as a "self" in East Asia from the analysis of constructivism. Based on the analysis of the interpretation of the concept of "identity" by Winter's moderate constructivism and the understanding of the connotation of the concept by other relevant schools of theory, this paper first analyzes the theory of identity formation. Because in his Social Theory of International Politics, Winter put forward two kinds of logic of identity formation, that is, natural selection and cultural selection. On the basis of this assumption, the main factors that influence the formation of national identity are: the concept of self-possession and the concept of others. These two aspects can be considered from two aspects: material factor (natural selection) and cultural factor (cultural choice). This is the theoretical framework proposed in this paper. Through this theoretical framework, this paper analyzes the status of China in East Asia during the period from the end of the Cold War to the end of the Cold War. That is to say, according to the hypothetical analytical framework of this paper, the analysis of China's identity in East Asia after the end of the Cold War is mainly from two angles: China's concept of self-possession and the concept of "other" in East Asia. The analysis of two problems is a very difficult problem to operate. For example: how to measure and analyze China's concept of self-holding, or China's self-identity? We can also generalize this question, and that becomes how to analyze a nation's self-identity. This paper puts forward the analysis from two aspects: material factor and cultural factor. In addition, there is a similar problem in the measurement of the other's ideas. The following is closely based on the framework of the theoretical assumptions of the article. How to verify the conclusions of this paper based on its own hypothesis and theoretical framework is also a key issue. This paper analyzes China's foreign policy to verify whether the conclusion of China's identity is correct. So, through what channels is the analysis of China's foreign policy solved? The last part of this paper will deal with these problems one by one.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D820

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊貴言;東亞概念辨析[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2002年02期

2 李曉;馮永琦;;中日兩國(guó)在東亞區(qū)域內(nèi)貿(mào)易中地位的變化及其影響[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2009年06期

3 馬榮久;;論地區(qū)與國(guó)家的相互塑造[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2010年02期

4 王曉玲;董向榮;;韓國(guó)人心目中的中國(guó)形象——基于焦點(diǎn)集團(tuán)訪談的研究結(jié)果[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2010年02期

5 劉豐;;安全預(yù)期、經(jīng)濟(jì)收益與東亞安全秩序[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2011年03期

6 王慶忠;;中國(guó)國(guó)家身份變遷與對(duì)外交往:以中國(guó)—東盟關(guān)系為例[J];東南亞研究;2009年06期

7 姜運(yùn)倉(cāng);東亞經(jīng)濟(jì)合作中的身份建構(gòu)[J];國(guó)際觀察;2004年04期

8 郭樹勇;;試論“建構(gòu)主義革命”對(duì)于當(dāng)代中國(guó)外交研究的若干意義[J];國(guó)際觀察;2009年01期

9 張清敏;外交政策分析中文化因素的作用與地位[J];國(guó)際論壇;2003年04期

10 李開盛;;利益、身份與外交政策[J];國(guó)際論壇;2010年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1808693