發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-17 04:33

  本文選題：選擇性政治 + 人道主義干預(yù)　； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：人道主義干預(yù)是一個(gè)為廣大學(xué)術(shù)界,政界以及輿論界廣泛關(guān)注的問(wèn)題。整個(gè)90年代,發(fā)生在伊拉克,索馬里,盧旺達(dá),波斯尼亞和科索沃的人權(quán)濫用的受到了道義上的評(píng)判。這讓托尼布萊爾在1999年得出結(jié)論：我們所面臨的最緊迫的外交政策問(wèn)題是,辨別我們贏在干涉國(guó)家爭(zhēng)端的大環(huán)境。 在所有的情況和案件中,安理會(huì)設(shè)法解決其議程內(nèi)有關(guān)維持和平的方面,涉及種族滅絕和大屠殺的那方面是最復(fù)雜的。國(guó)際共同體如何才能將應(yīng)對(duì)這些情況?目前還沒(méi)有達(dá)成真正解決問(wèn)題的共識(shí)：何時(shí)及如何介入可能發(fā)生的基本問(wèn)題?為挽救大規(guī)模侵犯人權(quán)行為的受害者,在使用武力的合法性上沒(méi)有達(dá)成協(xié)議.甚至沒(méi)有關(guān)于人道主義干預(yù)的定義,以及這是否是很合適的詞方面也沒(méi)有達(dá)成共識(shí)。而這些都是為什么在本研究中試圖發(fā)現(xiàn)的有趣的地方：在理論和現(xiàn)實(shí)層面,什么是定義干預(yù)與否的基礎(chǔ)。聯(lián)合國(guó)人道主義干預(yù)行動(dòng)的政策條件是什么?在何種情況下才會(huì)有人道主義干預(yù),導(dǎo)致這種干預(yù)最關(guān)鍵的因素是什么?關(guān)于1994年發(fā)生在盧旺達(dá)大屠殺,以及科索沃的事情,影響國(guó)際局勢(shì)的關(guān)鍵是什么?我的假設(shè)是：安全理事會(huì)所做出的回應(yīng)是基于法律上的考慮,人道主義關(guān)切以及國(guó)家利益的考慮。保護(hù)的職責(zé)在理論上可能存在,但在實(shí)踐中是“政治意愿”,這一切背后的因素,解釋了安理會(huì)的行動(dòng)。
[Abstract]:Humanitarian intervention is a widespread concern in academic, political and media circles.Throughout the 1990s, human rights abuses in Iraq, Somalia, Rwanda, Bosnia and Kosovo were judged morally.This led Tony Blair to conclude in 1999 that the most pressing foreign policy issue we face is to distinguish between the circumstances in which we win and interfere in state disputes.In all cases and cases, the Council has sought to resolve the peacekeeping aspects of its agenda, which are the most complex with regard to genocide and the Holocaust.How can the international community respond to these situations?There is no consensus on a real solution: when and how to intervene in the underlying issues that may arise?No agreement was reached on the legality of the use of force to save the victims of massive human rights violations.There is no consensus even on the definition of humanitarian intervention and on whether it is the right word.These are the interesting points why this study is trying to find out: what is the basis for defining intervention at both the theoretical and practical levels.What are the policy conditions for United Nations humanitarian intervention?Under what circumstances will there be humanitarian intervention and what are the most critical factors leading to such intervention?With regard to the 1994 massacre in Rwanda and the events in Kosovo, what is the key to the international situation?My assumption is that the Security Council's response is based on legal considerations, humanitarian concerns and considerations of national interest.The responsibility to protect may exist in theory, but in practice it is "political will", all of which explain the actions of the Security Council.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D813.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 李鳴;在聯(lián)合國(guó)框架下解決危機(jī)——評(píng)“9·11”事件后安理會(huì)反恐決議[J];政法論壇;2002年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1762107