本文選題：美國　切入點：網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2013年博士論文

【摘要】：波譎云詭的國際安全環(huán)境為民族國家安全戰(zhàn)略的制定與調(diào)整提供了不竭動力，冷戰(zhàn)時期前蘇聯(lián)的核威脅促成了美國互聯(lián)網(wǎng)戰(zhàn)略思維的萌生。隨著人類文明的發(fā)展，信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)對國家安全問題舉足輕重的地位使美國網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全戰(zhàn)略應(yīng)運而生。美國網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全戰(zhàn)略以“安全”、“繁榮”、“價值觀”和“主導(dǎo)權(quán)”為核心目標(biāo)，經(jīng)歷了比爾·克林頓、喬治·沃克·布什和巴拉克·奧巴馬時期的“三階嬗進(jìn)”，彰顯出戰(zhàn)略制定的“承襲與發(fā)展”、攻防態(tài)勢的“由守轉(zhuǎn)攻”及安全合作的“由內(nèi)向外”等特征。在實施上，美國網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全戰(zhàn)略以“安全能力構(gòu)建”、“國家利益至上”及“參與和主導(dǎo)”等原則為價值導(dǎo)向，以“超強(qiáng)的控制”、“全面的威懾”、“積極的干涉”和“廣泛的合作”等手段為實現(xiàn)路徑，取得顯著成效。然而，，美國政府仍無法避免來自國內(nèi)外的海量網(wǎng)絡(luò)攻擊，保證對網(wǎng)絡(luò)攻擊百分之百的安全防御；無法徹底解決網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中存在的諸多問題；無法阻止其他民族國家對自身主流價值觀的保存，這為美國網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全戰(zhàn)略的順利實施帶來諸多挑戰(zhàn)。在體系理論視閾下，美國網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全戰(zhàn)略不斷發(fā)展的根本動因在于國際網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間權(quán)力格局中單元與單元間及單元與格局間的互動，這種互動關(guān)系對中國政治與安全產(chǎn)生重要影響。中美兩國在國際網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的權(quán)力博弈尚處于相互試探階段，面對“優(yōu)勢地位護(hù)持”、“安全戰(zhàn)略調(diào)整”和“綜合威懾”等美國網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全戰(zhàn)略總體走向，中國政府在國家安全利益護(hù)持方面形勢嚴(yán)峻。從戰(zhàn)略地位提升、自主技術(shù)研發(fā)、安全能力構(gòu)建、全民“立體式”參與、網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿情危機(jī)應(yīng)對、國際安全合作及網(wǎng)絡(luò)文化弘揚等維度加強(qiáng)我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全建設(shè)，實乃當(dāng)務(wù)之急。
[Abstract]:The turbulent international security environment provides an inexhaustible motive force for the formulation and adjustment of the national security strategy. The nuclear threat of the former Soviet Union during the Cold War contributed to the emergence of American Internet strategic thinking.With the development of human civilization, information network plays an important role in national security.With the core goals of "security", "prosperity", "values" and "dominance", the US cybersecurity strategy has experienced the "third evolution" of Bill Clinton, George Walker Bush and Barack Obama.It shows the characteristics of "inheritance and development" of strategy formulation, "from defense to attack" of offensive and defense situation and "from inside to outside" of security cooperation and so on.In its implementation, the US network security strategy is guided by the principles of "security capability construction", "national interest first" and "participation and leadership", and is guided by "super control" and "comprehensive deterrence"."positive intervention" and "extensive cooperation" and other means to achieve the path, achieved remarkable results.However, the US government still can not avoid the massive network attack from home and abroad, guarantee 100% security defense against the network attack, and solve many problems existing in the development of network economy.It can not prevent other nation states from preserving their own mainstream values, which brings many challenges to the smooth implementation of American cyber security strategy.From the perspective of system theory, the fundamental reason for the continuous development of US cybersecurity strategy lies in the interaction between units and units and between units and patterns in the international cyberspace power pattern, which has an important impact on Chinese politics and security.The power game between China and the United States in the international cyberspace is still in the phase of exploring each other. In the face of the overall trend of the US network security strategy, such as "protecting the dominant position", "adjusting the security strategy" and "comprehensive deterrence", etc.The Chinese government is facing a grim situation in protecting its national security interests.It is urgent to strengthen the construction of our country's network security from the aspects of strategic position promotion, independent technology research and development, security ability construction, the participation of the whole people, the response to the crisis of network public opinion, the international security cooperation and the promotion of network culture.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D871.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉助仁;;美國網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全政策導(dǎo)向及其啟示[J];創(chuàng)新;2010年05期

2 林凌;;“7·5”暴力事件的網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論傳播特點及引導(dǎo)策略[J];當(dāng)代傳播;2009年05期

3 倪峰;霸權(quán)穩(wěn)定模式與東亞地區(qū)政治安全秩序[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2002年07期

4 黃鳳志;知識霸權(quán)與美國的世界新秩序[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2003年08期

5 吳潛濤;價值觀多樣化勢態(tài)與堅持社會主義集體主義價值觀導(dǎo)向[J];道德與文明;1999年04期

6 程群;胡延清;;《德國網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全戰(zhàn)略》解析[J];德國研究;2011年03期

7 譚安芬;;美國信息安全政策發(fā)展及其啟示[J];計算機(jī)安全;2011年11期

8 張曉歌;;美國建國初期孤立主義外交政策及其啟示[J];湖北社會科學(xué);2008年09期

9 黃旭東;;意識形態(tài)建設(shè)與國家安全維護(hù)[J];湖北社會科學(xué);2009年07期

10 余敏友;論國際組織的地位與作用[J];法學(xué)評論;1995年05期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 中國人民大學(xué)新聞學(xué)院 王更喜;[N];中國教育報;2012年

2 華東師范大學(xué)俄羅斯研究中心副主任 楊成;[N];文匯報;2011年

本文編號：1696226