本文選題：地方國際化　切入點：央地關(guān)系　出處：《上海外國語大學(xué)》2013年博士論文

【摘要】：在全球化的時代背景和中國走和平發(fā)展道路的政策指引下，中國地方部門在對外關(guān)系中的參與程度也達到了一個新的水平，成為當(dāng)代中國政治、經(jīng)濟生活中的突出現(xiàn)象。而學(xué)科特點造成的中國內(nèi)外政治結(jié)合型研究不足，以及中國內(nèi)外政治協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的理論化需要，都使得中國對外關(guān)系展開的地方參與研究成為一種新興的研究方向。同時，大量外事檔案、政府文件、統(tǒng)計數(shù)據(jù)的存在以及相關(guān)論著的涌現(xiàn)，使利用社會科學(xué)方法開展這項研究成為可能。本文提出，地方參與中國對外關(guān)系展開的程度與深度，取決于中國央地、內(nèi)外、地地三組關(guān)系的變化。為全面理解中國對外關(guān)系展開中的地方參與，本文的研究主要分為三個部分：首先，是理論部分的研究。對于地方參與對外關(guān)系的一般解釋而言，已有的多層治理理論與功能主義理論都有提倡競爭性合作的問題，潛在的政治社會學(xué)解釋則無法提供清晰的問題解決進路，而且現(xiàn)有理論多基于對西方國家對外關(guān)系的考察與辨析。在批判上述三種一般解釋的基礎(chǔ)上，將地方部門作為對外關(guān)系的“有限參與行為體”，提出地方參與對外關(guān)系的“有限參與”解釋。這一解釋，是在繼續(xù)和堅持承認(rèn)主權(quán)國家是國際關(guān)系行為主體的前提下，以中央對地方的對外事務(wù)授權(quán)有限為原則，將地方提升到作為對外關(guān)系的一類“有限”參與主體，并以對外關(guān)系發(fā)展中央地、內(nèi)外、地地的合作最大化為目標(biāo)，在“整體”考量的基礎(chǔ)上，注重國家的國內(nèi)-國際綜合治理觀形成。其次，是比較研究方面。通過中西在地方參與對外關(guān)系方面的比較研究，特別是與代表聯(lián)邦制國家的德國進行比較，提出政治關(guān)系與法律關(guān)系這兩種央地關(guān)系傳統(tǒng)，和央地協(xié)力與央地競合這兩類有限參與適用，從而厘清中國對外關(guān)系展開中的地方參與之組織特點、歷史流變和運行邏輯。最后，，在案例研究部分，使有限參與的解釋貫穿于沿海經(jīng)濟次區(qū)域的國際化、邊境省區(qū)與跨區(qū)域國際合作、中國非中央政府駐德代表機構(gòu)以及地方發(fā)展與國際組織在華活動等研究。并通過上述四個案例，從由內(nèi)而外、由外而內(nèi)兩個大的觀察視角，既說明中國對外關(guān)系展開中的地方參與形式與現(xiàn)狀，又進一步驗證緒論部分提出的，在新的國際環(huán)境下，中國對外關(guān)系展開中存在央地協(xié)力的政策傾向；中國在內(nèi)外關(guān)系協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的實踐中實現(xiàn)了國內(nèi)國際制度建設(shè)的不斷優(yōu)化；地方多樣性蘊含著中國對外關(guān)系展開中可能的地地合作三個研究假設(shè)。
[Abstract]:Under the guidance of the era of globalization and China's policy of taking the path of peaceful development, the participation of local authorities in foreign relations has also reached a new level, becoming contemporary Chinese politics. The prominent phenomenon in economic life, and the lack of research on the combination of internal and external politics caused by the characteristics of disciplines, as well as the theoretical needs of the coordinated development of internal and external politics in China, All of which make the research of local participation in China's foreign relations a new research direction. At the same time, the existence of a large number of foreign affairs files, government documents, statistical data and the emergence of related works. This paper suggests that the extent and depth of local participation in the development of China's foreign relations depends on the central, internal and external areas of China. In order to fully understand the local participation in the development of China's foreign relations, the research in this paper is divided into three parts: first, the theoretical part of the study. For the general interpretation of local participation in foreign relations, Existing theories of multi-level governance and functionalism both have the problem of advocating competitive cooperation, while potential political and sociological explanations cannot provide a clear path to the solution of the problem. Moreover, most of the existing theories are based on the investigation and analysis of the foreign relations of western countries. On the basis of criticizing the three general explanations mentioned above, Taking the local sector as the "limited participation actor" in external relations, and proposing the "limited participation" interpretation of local participation in foreign relations... this interpretation is based on the continued and persistent recognition of sovereign States as the subject of international relations, Based on the principle of limited authorization from the central government to local foreign affairs, the local government should be promoted to be a kind of "limited" participant in foreign relations, with the aim of maximizing the cooperation among the central, internal and external, local and local authorities in the development of foreign relations. On the basis of "overall" consideration, we should pay attention to the formation of a country's domestic and international comprehensive governance concept. Secondly, it is about comparative research. Through the comparative study of local participation in foreign relations between China and the West, In particular, comparing with Germany, which represents the federal state, it puts forward the tradition of political relations and legal relations, and the two types of limited participation, that is, the cooperation of central authorities and the competition between central regions and central regions. In order to clarify the organizational characteristics, historical changes and operational logic of local participation in the development of China's foreign relations, finally, in the case study part, the explanation of limited participation runs through the internationalization of the coastal economic sub-region. Border provinces, regions and cross-regional international cooperation, Chinese non-central government representative offices in Germany and the activities of local development and international organizations in China. And through the four cases mentioned above, from the inside to outside, from the outside to the inside, two big observation angles are taken. It not only explains the form and present situation of local participation in the development of China's foreign relations, but also further verifies the policy tendency of central and local cooperation in the development of China's foreign relations under the new international environment. In the practice of harmonious development of internal and external relations, China has realized the continuous optimization of domestic and international institutional construction, and local diversity contains three hypotheses of possible ground cooperation in the development of China's external relations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海外國語大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D822.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王小民;全球問題與全球治理[J];東南亞研究;2004年04期

2 蘇長和;;中國的軟權(quán)力——以國際制度與中國的關(guān)系為例[J];國際觀察;2007年02期

3 溫軍;中國少數(shù)民族經(jīng)濟政策穩(wěn)定性評估(1949～2002年)(下)[J];開發(fā)研究;2004年04期

4 龔鐵鷹;國際關(guān)系視野中的城市——地位、功能及政治走向[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治;2004年08期

5 朱健剛;;國際NGO與中國地方治理創(chuàng)新——以珠三角為例[J];開放時代;2007年05期

6 陳志敏;二元民族聯(lián)邦制與對外關(guān)系:加拿大魁北克省的國際活動研究[J];太平洋學(xué)報;2000年03期

7 蘇長和;;國內(nèi)-國際相互轉(zhuǎn)型的政治經(jīng)濟學(xué)——兼論中國國內(nèi)變遷與國際體系的關(guān)系(1978~2007)[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治;2007年11期

8 王逸舟;中國與國際組織關(guān)系研究的若干問題[J];社會科學(xué)論壇;2002年08期

9 朱貴昌;;多層治理理論與歐洲一體化[J];外交評論-外交學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年06期

10 潘忠岐;新功能主義擴溢理論及其批判[J];上海交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2003年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 鄭健壯;基于資源整合理論的制造業(yè)集群競爭力的研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2005年

本文編號：1663373