從2005年烏茲別克斯坦對(duì)俄政策的轉(zhuǎn)變看其對(duì)俄外交的波動(dòng)原因
本文選題:烏茲別克斯坦 切入點(diǎn):俄羅斯 出處:《華東師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文
【摘要】:中亞地區(qū)是與我國(guó)接壤的重要地區(qū),從國(guó)家安全和社會(huì)穩(wěn)定的角度來(lái)看,我國(guó)新疆地區(qū)的安全和穩(wěn)定也與這一區(qū)域緊密相關(guān)。雖然我國(guó)與烏茲別克斯坦并不接壤,但雙方從絲綢之路開(kāi)始便有著友好交往的傳統(tǒng)。隨著中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展和國(guó)家地位的提高,中國(guó)與烏茲別克斯坦在反恐、能源、經(jīng)貿(mào)等方面的合作也越來(lái)越多。對(duì)于中國(guó)而言,深入研究烏俄關(guān)系,對(duì)今后制定對(duì)中亞的政策、妥善處理中烏關(guān)系和中俄關(guān)系有著重大意義,對(duì)確保我國(guó)在能源供應(yīng)領(lǐng)域的安全起到重要作用。 本文應(yīng)用國(guó)內(nèi)國(guó)際相關(guān)性理論、地緣政治理論、政治文化理論和層次分析法,試圖尋找烏茲別克斯坦對(duì)俄政策搖擺不定的真正原因。首先從國(guó)際環(huán)境、國(guó)家和個(gè)人三個(gè)層次入手來(lái)分析“安集延事件”后烏茲別克斯坦對(duì)俄政策的轉(zhuǎn)變?cè)?并得出其外交行為是受體制安全這一根本原因的驅(qū)動(dòng)這一結(jié)論。之后分析了烏茲別克斯坦獨(dú)立以來(lái)對(duì)俄政策的整體演變,驗(yàn)證了體制安全因素在其外交政策制定過(guò)程中起到的重要作用。 本文全文格局由緒論和正文兩部分構(gòu)成。在緒論部分,主要介紹了選擇烏茲別克斯坦對(duì)俄政策的轉(zhuǎn)變?cè)蜻@一主題進(jìn)行研究的重要意義和該領(lǐng)域的國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)研究情況,并對(duì)文章中應(yīng)用的國(guó)內(nèi)國(guó)際相關(guān)性理論、地緣政治理論、政治文化理論和層次分析法進(jìn)行了闡述。第一章主要簡(jiǎn)述“安集延事件”前后烏茲別克斯坦對(duì)俄的政策轉(zhuǎn)變,這一章分為三個(gè)小節(jié),先介紹了“安集延事件”的基本情況,然后從對(duì)比的角度出發(fā),在第二、三小結(jié)分別描述了“安集延事件”前后烏茲別克斯坦的對(duì)俄政策。第二章著重分析“安集延事件”后烏茲別克斯坦對(duì)俄政策改變的動(dòng)因,從個(gè)人、國(guó)內(nèi)和國(guó)際環(huán)境三個(gè)層面分別進(jìn)行分析,得出體制安全這一根本原因。第三章分析了烏獨(dú)立以來(lái)對(duì)俄政策的整體演變,驗(yàn)證了體制安全的根本驅(qū)動(dòng)作用。第四章試得出結(jié)論。
[Abstract]:The Central Asian region is an important region bordering on our country. From the point of view of national security and social stability, the security and stability of our Xinjiang region are also closely related to this region, although our country does not share a border with Uzbekistan. However, the two sides have a tradition of friendly exchanges since the Silk Road. With the development of China's economy and the improvement of its status as a country, China and Uzbekistan are also increasingly cooperating in anti-terrorism, energy, trade, and other fields. For China, The in-depth study of Ukrainian-Russian relations will play an important role in ensuring the security of our country in the field of energy supply, as well as in formulating policies for Central Asia, properly handling Sino-Ukrainian relations and Sino-Russian relations in the future. This paper applies domestic and international relevance theory, geopolitical theory, political culture theory and analytic hierarchy process to find out the real reasons for Uzbekistan's wavering policy toward Russia. First, from the international environment, Starting with the state and individual levels, we will analyze the reasons for the change in Uzbekistan's policy towards Russia after the "Andijan incident." And it comes to the conclusion that its diplomatic behavior is driven by the fundamental reason of institutional security. After that, it analyzes the overall evolution of Uzbekistan's policy towards Russia since its independence. It verifies the important role of institutional security factors in the process of foreign policy formulation. This paper consists of two parts: introduction and text. In the introduction part, it mainly introduces the significance of the study on the reasons for the change of Uzbekistan's Russian policy and the relevant research situation at home and abroad in this field. The domestic and international relevance theory, geopolitical theory, political culture theory and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) applied in this paper are expounded. The first chapter mainly describes the policy changes of Uzbekistan to Russia before and after Andijan incident. This chapter is divided into three sections. It first introduces the basic situation of the Andijan event, then from a comparative point of view, in the second, Chapter two focuses on the analysis of the reasons for the change of Uzbekistan's policy towards Russia after the "Andijan incident". The third chapter analyzes the overall evolution of the Russian policy since the independence of Ukraine and verifies the fundamental driving effect of institutional security. Chapter four tries to draw a conclusion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D836.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張國(guó)風(fēng);烏茲別克斯坦與俄羅斯的關(guān)系及其對(duì)中亞地區(qū)發(fā)展走勢(shì)的影響[J];東歐中亞研究;2000年03期
2 孫壯志;當(dāng)前中亞地區(qū)安全形勢(shì)分析[J];俄羅斯中亞?wèn)|歐研究;2003年06期
3 李淑云;中亞未來(lái):誰(shuí)主沉浮[J];俄羅斯中亞?wèn)|歐研究;2004年06期
4 高祖貴;美國(guó)與中亞的關(guān)系分析[J];俄羅斯中亞?wèn)|歐研究;2005年02期
5 靳會(huì)新;;獨(dú)聯(lián)體以及影響其走向的內(nèi)部因素分析[J];俄羅斯中亞?wèn)|歐研究;2006年04期
6 趙會(huì)榮;;論影響烏茲別克斯坦外交決策的因素[J];俄羅斯中亞?wèn)|歐研究;2007年01期
7 鄭羽;;蘇聯(lián)解體以來(lái)美國(guó)對(duì)中亞政策的演變(1991~2006)[J];俄羅斯中亞?wèn)|歐研究;2007年04期
8 吳大輝;;美國(guó)對(duì)中亞的軍事安全政策[J];俄羅斯中亞?wèn)|歐研究;2008年02期
9 李立凡;;歐盟:新的中亞“戰(zhàn)略玩家”[J];俄羅斯中亞?wèn)|歐研究;2008年04期
10 古莉娜拉·卡里莫娃;蘇暢;;烏茲別克斯坦視角下的中亞地區(qū)安全形勢(shì)[J];俄羅斯中亞?wèn)|歐研究;2010年04期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條
1 本報(bào)駐哈薩克斯坦記者 孫力;[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2008年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條
1 齊為群;南海地緣政治與中國(guó)國(guó)家安全[D];山東大學(xué);2011年
2 徐浩淼;試析中亞地區(qū)的伊斯蘭極端主義[D];新疆大學(xué);2006年
3 孫丹;當(dāng)代烏茲別克斯坦對(duì)俄羅斯政策的演變及原因探析[D];外交學(xué)院;2008年
4 杜宇萍;冷戰(zhàn)后美國(guó)對(duì)烏茲別克斯坦政策的發(fā)展與演變探析[D];新疆大學(xué);2010年
,本文編號(hào):1655904
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/waijiao/1655904.html