本文選題：客觀變化　切入點(diǎn)：不平衡　出處：《現(xiàn)代國際關(guān)系》2015年02期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：正2014年中美博弈有所緩和,但未根本好轉(zhuǎn)。冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束以來,中美之間曾出現(xiàn)過幾次安全危機(jī),如1995~1996年的"臺(tái)海危機(jī)"、1999年的"炸館事件"、2001年的"撞機(jī)事件",但中國都成功地"扛過去"了。然而,始于2010年前后的此輪中美安全博弈卻不同于以往,它源于中美政治經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展不平衡所帶來的安全實(shí)力接近和東亞安全結(jié)構(gòu)的客觀變化,因此呈現(xiàn)"長周期"、"低烈度"的特點(diǎn)。在未來可預(yù)見的一段較長時(shí)間內(nèi),它還會(huì)繼續(xù)發(fā)酵,甚至可能出現(xiàn)某種程度的安全困境。但受中美雙方國內(nèi)外
[Abstract]:In middle of 2014, the game between the United States and the United States eased somewhat, but it did not fundamentally improve. Since the end of the Cold War, there have been several security crises between China and the United States. For example, the "Taiwan Strait crisis" from 1995 to 1996, the "bombing incident" on 1999, the "plane collision incident" on 2001, but China has successfully "carried it through". However, this round of security games between China and the United States, which began around 2001, is different from the past. It stems from the close proximity of security strength brought by the imbalance of political and economic development between China and the United States and the objective changes in the security structure of East Asia, so it presents the characteristics of "long period" and "low intensity." it will continue to ferment for a longer period of time in the foreseeable future. There may even be some sort of security dilemma. But both China and the United States are at home and abroad.
【作者單位】： 國際關(guān)系學(xué)院國際政治系;
【分類號(hào)】：D81;D822

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 顧杰;;全球化給當(dāng)代中國社會(huì)主義帶來的機(jī)遇和挑戰(zhàn)[J];學(xué)習(xí)月刊;2001年02期

2 王春輝;;陳獨(dú)秀眼中的蘇俄[J];蘭臺(tái)世界;2014年10期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 本報(bào)兩會(huì)報(bào)道組 胡瀟瀅;朱從玖：上市公司業(yè)績變臉存主客觀原因[N];證券日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1579643