本文關(guān)鍵詞： 言語行為 社會建構(gòu) 政治語篇 交際意圖 伊拉克戰(zhàn)爭　出處：《東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：作為人類社會主要的交流工具,語言最重要的功能之一就是通過不同形式的言語行為來表述世界。通過語言,人們能夠把復(fù)雜的社會世界表達(dá)出來,使之條理化、有序化。語言使用者在使用語言時不是任意的,任何一個言語行為都帶有交流意圖。說話者通過語言的使用變化來實(shí)現(xiàn)自己的交流意圖。自20世紀(jì)80年代以來,越來越多的語言學(xué)研究者將眼光投向語言在社會建構(gòu)中的作用的研究。這些研究總體認(rèn)為語言在政治語境中不僅是一種交流工具,還具有行事性和建構(gòu)作用。隨著國家間交往的日益增多,政治行為體對語言在社會建構(gòu)中的作用的認(rèn)識顯得尤為重要,因?yàn)檎Z言的良好運(yùn)用會給政治行為體在國際關(guān)系中提供助力。研究語言在社會建構(gòu)中的作用有助于更好地理解國際關(guān)系中復(fù)雜的種種現(xiàn)象。除此之外,在面對危機(jī)時,對外交決策者也有現(xiàn)實(shí)指導(dǎo)意義。因此本文選取伊拉克戰(zhàn)爭期間美國政治語篇作為研究對象,通過具體分析模式分析危機(jī)時期政治行為體如何運(yùn)用語言建構(gòu)社會,傳達(dá)自己的交際意圖,為其政治目的服務(wù)。 本文由五個章節(jié)構(gòu)成。第一章為緒論部分,介紹了本文的研究目的、研究意義以及本文總體結(jié)構(gòu)。第二章為文獻(xiàn)綜述部分。此章節(jié)為本研究涉及的術(shù)語交際意圖和政治語篇進(jìn)行了定義,并對本文的理論基礎(chǔ)言語行為理論進(jìn)行了介紹。此外,對國內(nèi)外相關(guān)研究進(jìn)行回顧總結(jié)。第三章首先介紹本文的研究問題和數(shù)據(jù)的收集方法,然后提出具體的分析模式來看政治語境中說話者如何運(yùn)用語言表達(dá)其交際意圖。本文提出的分析模式為：語篇層次、詞匯層次、句子層次；在語篇層次,說話者通過篩選敘述內(nèi)容,使某些事物排除在話語之外使其消失在意義體系外,通過頻繁地重復(fù)某些內(nèi)容而使其進(jìn)入穩(wěn)定的話語體系；詞匯層次,作為語言建構(gòu)最小單位的各類詞匯建構(gòu)身份并解釋語境；在句子層次,行為體通過言語行為的變化和句式的選擇來實(shí)現(xiàn)社會建構(gòu)。第四章是對具體語篇的分析。根據(jù)戰(zhàn)爭的不同時期本文將語篇分為三個時期：戰(zhàn)前、戰(zhàn)時、以及戰(zhàn)爭后期。在每個層次上分別對三個時期的演講做以分析,觀察說話者如何傳達(dá)其交際意圖,使聽話者接受說話者建構(gòu)的身份、政策和意義體系等。第五章為結(jié)論部分,回答了提出的問題,指出了本研究的啟示。同時也對本研究存在的局限性以及對今后相關(guān)研究的建議進(jìn)行了討論。
[Abstract]:As the main communication tool of human society, one of the most important functions of language is to express the world through different forms of speech acts. Orderliness. Language users are not arbitrary in their use of language. Any speech act has a communication intention. The speaker realizes his or her communication intention by changing the use of language. Since 1980s, More and more linguistic researchers are focusing on the role of language in social construction. With the increasing communication between countries, the understanding of the role of language in social construction is particularly important. Because the good use of language can help political actors in international relations. Studying the role of language in social construction helps to better understand the complex phenomena in international relations. In addition, in the face of crisis, Therefore, this paper chooses the American political discourse during the Iraq War as the research object, and analyzes how the political actors use language to construct the society in the crisis period through the concrete analysis mode. Convey one's own communicative intentions and serve their political purposes. This paper is composed of five chapters. The first chapter is the introduction part, which introduces the purpose of this paper. The second chapter is literature review. This chapter defines the terms communicative intention and political discourse involved in this study, and introduces the theoretical basis of the speech act theory. The third chapter introduces the research problems and data collection methods of this paper. Then it puts forward specific analytical models to see how the speaker uses language to express his communicative intention in the political context. The analytical models proposed in this paper are as follows: discourse level, lexical level, sentence level, at the discourse level, and at the discourse level. The speaker makes certain things disappear from the meaning system by sifting the narrative content out of the utterance, and enters into the stable discourse system by repeating some content frequently; lexical level. As the smallest unit of language construction, lexicon constructs identity and interprets context; at sentence level, The actor realizes the social construction through the change of speech act and the choice of sentence structure. Chapter 4th is an analysis of the specific text. According to the different periods of war, the text is divided into three periods: Pre-war, wartime, and so on. And later war. At each level, we analyze the three periods of speech, observe how the speaker conveys their communicative intention, and make the hearer accept the identity, policy and meaning system of the speaker. Chapter 5th is the conclusion part. This paper answers the questions raised, points out the implications of this study, and discusses the limitations of this study and the suggestions for future research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D871.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 劉永濤;語言、身份建構(gòu)和美國對外政策話語中的“邪惡論”[J];國際觀察;2005年05期

2 苗興偉;言語行為理論與語篇分析[J];外語學(xué)刊;1999年01期

，

本文編號：1553034