本文關(guān)鍵詞： 退約 核不擴(kuò)散 國(guó)際制度 社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò) 朝核問(wèn)題　出處：《外交學(xué)院》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：2003年，朝鮮宣布退出《不擴(kuò)散核武器條約》，成為迄今為止退出核不擴(kuò)散機(jī)制的唯一國(guó)家。此文將具有分化傾向的國(guó)際制度視作一種外部壓力，認(rèn)為不斷升高而又有區(qū)別的義務(wù)水平會(huì)增加成員退約的意愿。那么在現(xiàn)實(shí)中，一項(xiàng)制度為何被成員國(guó)放棄？又為何有國(guó)家在面臨制度壓力時(shí)選擇繼續(xù)留在制度內(nèi)（盡管同樣繼續(xù)違約）？此文從制度的社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)視角分析了制度成員的社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)特征與行為選擇之間的關(guān)聯(lián)，，指出在制度網(wǎng)絡(luò)中相對(duì)邊緣的朝鮮與相對(duì)中心的伊朗在行為選擇中存在的明顯差異。此文還通過(guò)對(duì)朝鮮退約之后美朝在核問(wèn)題領(lǐng)域的互動(dòng)過(guò)程的追蹤，說(shuō)明大國(guó)承諾的履行對(duì)于小國(guó)行為約束的顯著影響。
[Abstract]:In 2003, the DPRK announced its withdrawal from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear weapons (NPT) and became the only country so far to withdraw from the nuclear non-proliferation regime. This article regards the divisive international system as an external pressure. The idea that rising and differentiated levels of obligations would increase the willingness of members to withdraw. So why, in reality, is a system abandoned by member States? And why do countries choose to stay in the system when they face institutional pressure (even though they continue to default? This paper analyzes the relationship between the social network characteristics of institutional members and their behavior choices from the perspective of institutional social networks. The paper points out the obvious difference in behavior choice between North Korea, which is relatively marginal in the institutional network, and Iran, which is relatively central. This paper also tracks the interaction between the United States and North Korea in the field of nuclear issue after North Korea's withdrawal from the treaty. It shows the significant influence of the implementation of the great power commitment on the behavior restraint of the small country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D815.2


本文編號(hào)：1468069