發(fā)布時間：2018-01-15 15:06

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：美國“干涉”朝鮮半島事務(wù)的緣由及途徑研究　出處：《延邊大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 干涉 朝鮮半島 新干涉主義 東北亞

【摘要】：這篇論文通過對冷戰(zhàn)以來,美國在朝鮮半島地區(qū)所進(jìn)行的各方面的“干涉”的研究,去更深一步探討,在諸多的“干涉”中,美國是要達(dá)到何種戰(zhàn)略目的,這種戰(zhàn)略目的與目標(biāo)對朝鮮半島的和平與穩(wěn)定有著如何的影響。以及朝鮮半島區(qū)域內(nèi)相關(guān)各國應(yīng)該如何面對這種“干涉”行為。在朝鮮半島區(qū)域內(nèi)是否也存在著一定的合理的“干涉”行為。從古至今關(guān)于干涉的概念在國際政治與國際法中存在著各式各樣的界定與看法。關(guān)于干涉的概念實在有太多種,單從漢語詞典中我們?nèi)タ锤缮孢@一詞匯就包含了兩種含義：一是關(guān)涉、關(guān)系,如二者了無干涉；二是過問或者制止,多指不應(yīng)該管硬管,如互不干涉內(nèi)政。在權(quán)威的《美國百科全書》中我們也能看到這其中對“干涉”一詞的解釋與界定：“干涉意指一國對別國內(nèi)部事務(wù)或兩個國家間關(guān)系的專橫干預(yù)。”在國際政治領(lǐng)域中,關(guān)于對美國的“介入”行為及理論的研究屢見不鮮,但是大多都是停留在以人權(quán),人道主義,國際法中的一些層面,當(dāng)然也包括一些地區(qū)范圍內(nèi)的研究。從這些研究中我們不難看出,美國的“干涉”已經(jīng)遍布全球各個角落。從軍事、文化、經(jīng)濟(jì)中也處處都體現(xiàn)著美國的種種“介入”。而朝鮮半島對于美國來說有著不可忽視的重要戰(zhàn)略意義。在冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束后,美國就利用各種借口對這一地區(qū)進(jìn)行“干涉”,從而達(dá)到遏制、控制的絕對主導(dǎo)地位。美國的“新干涉主義”不僅削弱了聯(lián)合國在維持國際和平與安全方面的作用以及國際法的權(quán)威性,還破壞了地區(qū)的安全與穩(wěn)定。可以說,美國在朝鮮半島推行的“新干涉主義”策略是其全球化戰(zhàn)略的一部分。尤其是在冷戰(zhàn)之后,從美國歷屆政府的朝鮮半島政策來看,朝鮮半島不但沒有失去其戰(zhàn)略價值,反而對美國產(chǎn)生了新的戰(zhàn)略意義。其舊有的“遏制戰(zhàn)略”也轉(zhuǎn)變成為了“新靈活反應(yīng)戰(zhàn)略”。這一戰(zhàn)略的目標(biāo)便是威懾企圖挑戰(zhàn)美國地區(qū)控制力的國家,同時防止這些國家間的任何聯(lián)合行動導(dǎo)致美國亞洲戰(zhàn)略利益的損失。分析研究美國在東北亞的“新干涉主義”戰(zhàn)略有助于我們理解美國的戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo),并且能夠啟發(fā)我國在處理朝鮮半島問題時能夠“創(chuàng)造性的介入”。相比以往,這種更加積極主動的外交方式,不僅能夠更好地維護(hù)中國的國家利益,也更加能體現(xiàn)中國的國際責(zé)任和義務(wù)
[Abstract]:This article through to the United States since the cold war on the Korean Peninsula in all aspects of the "interference" of the research, to further explore, in many of the "interference" in the United States, which is to achieve the strategic objective, the strategic objective is how to influence on the peace and stability on the Korean peninsula the Korean Peninsula region. And the relevant countries should be how to deal with this "interference" behavior. Whether on the Korean Peninsula in the region there are some reasonable "interference" behavior. Since ancient times about interference exists in the concept definition and every kind of views in international politics and international law. On the concept of interference and too many. From the Chinese dictionary we went to see the word interference contains two meanings: one is concerned, the relationship between the two, such as no interference; two is to intervene or stop, which should not be hard tube The tube, such as non-interference in the authority of the United States. "Encyclopedia > we can also see that the" interference "interpretation of the word and definition:" means a country to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries or two countries between arbitrary intervention. "In the field of international politics, about us" in "behavior and the theory of It is often seen. but mostly, stay in the humanitarian, human rights, some level of international law, including some areas within the scope of the study. From these studies we can see that the United States" interference "has been all over the world. From the military, culture. The economy also embodies the" intervention "of the United States. While the Korean Peninsula has an important strategic significance for the United States. At the end of the cold war, the United States will use all kinds of excuses to the area of" interference", In order to curb the absolute dominant position control. The "new interventionism" not only weaken the United Nations in the maintenance of international peace and security and the role of the authority of international law, but also destroy the security and stability in the region. It can be said that the implementation of the United States on the Korean Peninsula "new interventionism" strategy is a part of its global strategy. Especially after the cold war, from the point of view of the previous U.S. government policy on the Korean Peninsula, the Korean Peninsula has not lost its strategic value, but has a new strategic significance to the United States. The old "containment strategy" has become the "new flexible response strategy. The goal of this strategy it is an attempt to challenge the United States deterrent force control areas of the country, while preventing any joint action among these countries in Asian American strategic interests loss. Analysis of research in the United States in Northeast Asia The "new interventionism" strategy will help us understand the strategic objectives of the United States, and can inspire our country to "creative intervention" in the Korean Peninsula. Compared to the past, this more active diplomacy, not only to better safeguard the state interests Chinese, also reflects the Chinese international responsibility and obligations

【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D815

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王麗萍;人道主義干預(yù):國際政治中的理想與現(xiàn)實[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2000年06期

2 賀鑒;論冷戰(zhàn)后的國際干預(yù)——以米洛舍維奇事件為例[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會主義;2005年03期

3 張秀三;論人道主義干涉及其實質(zhì)[J];東南亞研究;2001年03期

4 陳舟望;現(xiàn)當(dāng)代挑戰(zhàn)主權(quán)思潮批判[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1998年01期

5 劉學(xué)成;美國預(yù)防性外交的理念與主張[J];國際問題研究;2000年04期

6 劉金質(zhì);試論冷戰(zhàn)后美國的干涉主義[J];國際政治研究;1998年03期

7 范士明;“人道的”干預(yù)——美國對外政策中的新“克林頓主義”[J];國際政治研究;2000年01期

8 田娟;賈春陽;;試析冷戰(zhàn)后美國外交政策中的新干涉主義[J];哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年08期

9 張小明;約瑟夫·奈的“軟權(quán)力”思想分析[J];美國研究;2005年01期

10 周桂銀,黨新凱;權(quán)力政治、國家體系和國際關(guān)系思想傳統(tǒng)——馬丁·懷特的國際關(guān)系思想[J];歐洲研究;2005年01期

，

本文編號：1428854