關(guān)于新時(shí)期釣魚島問(wèn)題上日本政府立場(chǎng)與應(yīng)對(duì)的比較研究
本文關(guān)鍵詞:關(guān)于新時(shí)期釣魚島問(wèn)題上日本政府立場(chǎng)與應(yīng)對(duì)的比較研究 出處:《吉林大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
更多相關(guān)文章: 釣魚島問(wèn)題 日本政府 民主黨政府 自民黨政府 比較研究
【摘要】:釣魚島問(wèn)題是影響中日關(guān)系的關(guān)鍵問(wèn)題。2011年時(shí)任日本首相的野田佳彥一意孤行地將釣魚島進(jìn)行所謂的“國(guó)有化”,引起了國(guó)際國(guó)內(nèi)的廣泛關(guān)注。隨后,菅直人上臺(tái),,繼續(xù)針對(duì)釣魚島問(wèn)題采取了一系列措施,直到安倍晉三再度當(dāng)選日本首相以來(lái),從國(guó)際和國(guó)內(nèi)兩個(gè)方面采取了許多手段和策略,用釣魚島問(wèn)題大做文章,直接影響了地區(qū)的安定和中日兩國(guó)的關(guān)系,這些都是日本政府針對(duì)釣魚島問(wèn)題采取的不同措施,了解和分析這些措施和應(yīng)對(duì)之策,對(duì)分析日本的戰(zhàn)略決策和對(duì)待中國(guó)的態(tài)度都有積極的意義。從理論和實(shí)踐兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)行分析,一方面可以研究日本政府的行為動(dòng)機(jī),另一方面也可以分析其行為之中隱藏的深層次原因,這對(duì)于分析中日關(guān)系的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r和未來(lái)走向具有積極的作用和意義。 本文由六個(gè)部分組成: 導(dǎo)論部分主要說(shuō)明和闡述了本文的研究意義,概述了研究現(xiàn)狀、研究目的以及研究方法。 第一章主要分析了日本政府關(guān)于釣魚島問(wèn)題政治觀念的變化。理論結(jié)合釣魚島問(wèn)題的現(xiàn)實(shí)情況,分析了不同時(shí)期日本政府應(yīng)對(duì)釣魚島問(wèn)題進(jìn)行的一系列行為和舉措。隨后闡述了政治心理因素對(duì)兩個(gè)政黨政權(quán)的影響,進(jìn)而分析了國(guó)內(nèi)外因素對(duì)日本政府政治觀念的影響和作用。 第二章著重分析了日本政府針對(duì)領(lǐng)土問(wèn)題的法律制度以及基本政策。共分為三個(gè)層次,第一是基本法律制定的演變過(guò)程,第二是基本制度建設(shè)的演變過(guò)程,第三是處理國(guó)際問(wèn)題機(jī)制的演變過(guò)程。 第三章主要闡述的是民主黨政權(quán)與自民黨政權(quán)針對(duì)釣魚島問(wèn)題的應(yīng)對(duì)措施,從政治、軍事和外交三個(gè)層面進(jìn)行分析,同時(shí)選取了國(guó)際國(guó)內(nèi)公關(guān)與輿論操控的角度進(jìn)行分析。 第四章通過(guò)從不同的維度比較菅直人、野田佳彥和安倍晉三三個(gè)政權(quán)執(zhí)掌下的日本政府應(yīng)對(duì)釣魚島問(wèn)題的措施的相同和不同點(diǎn)。闡釋三個(gè)政權(quán)應(yīng)對(duì)釣魚島問(wèn)題措施中既有各自獨(dú)特的特點(diǎn),也有一以貫之的相同之處。本章指出,日本政府應(yīng)對(duì)釣魚島問(wèn)題的措施事實(shí)上是在加劇日本在釣魚島問(wèn)題上的困境,并衍伸為日本所面臨的危機(jī)。 本文的結(jié)論部分,從全文的謀篇布局對(duì)日本政府在釣魚島問(wèn)題上的不同應(yīng)對(duì)措施進(jìn)行梳理?偟膩(lái)看,通過(guò)整體性的論證與分析,為從戰(zhàn)略層面闡釋日本政府的作為與預(yù)測(cè)未來(lái)的趨勢(shì)提供有效的分析視角。
[Abstract]:The Diaoyu Islands issue is a key issue affecting Sino-Japanese relations. In 2011, then Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda insisted on the so-called "nationalization" of the Diaoyu Islands, which aroused widespread international and domestic concern. Naoto Kan took office, continued to take a series of measures on the Diaoyu Islands, until Shinzo Abe was re-elected Prime Minister of Japan, from the international and domestic aspects of many measures and strategies. The use of the Diaoyu Islands issue has directly affected the stability of the region and the relations between China and Japan. These are the different measures taken by the Japanese government to deal with the Diaoyu Islands issue and the understanding and analysis of these measures and countermeasures. It is of positive significance to analyze the strategic decision of Japan and its attitude towards China. On the one hand, it is possible to study the motivation of the Japanese government in terms of both theory and practice. On the other hand, it can also analyze the underlying causes in its behavior, which has a positive role and significance for the analysis of the development and future trend of Sino-Japanese relations. This paper consists of six parts: The introduction mainly explains and expounds the significance of this research, summarizes the research status, research purposes and research methods. The first chapter mainly analyzes the Japanese government on the Diaoyu Islands political concept changes. Theory combined with the Diaoyu Islands reality. This paper analyzes a series of actions and measures taken by the Japanese government to deal with the Diaoyu Islands problem in different periods, and then expounds the influence of the political psychological factors on the political power of the two political parties. Then it analyzes the influence and function of domestic and foreign factors on Japanese government's political concept. The second chapter focuses on the analysis of the Japanese government's legal system and basic policies on territorial issues. It is divided into three levels: the first is the evolution of the basic law making process, and the second is the evolution process of the basic system construction. The third is the evolution of the mechanism for dealing with international issues. The third chapter mainly describes the Democratic Party regime and the LDP regime in response to the Diaoyu Islands from the political, military and diplomatic aspects of the analysis. At the same time, select the international and domestic public relations and public opinion manipulation angle to analyze. Chapter 4th compares Naoto Kan from different dimensions. Yoshihiko Noda and Shinzo Abe under the leadership of the Japanese government to deal with the Diaoyu Islands in the same and different ways to explain the three regimes to deal with the Diaoyu Islands have their own unique characteristics. This chapter points out that the measures taken by the Japanese government to deal with the Diaoyu Islands are in fact exacerbating Japan's predicament on the Diaoyu Islands and extending to the crisis faced by Japan. The conclusion of this paper, from the full text of the layout of the Diaoyu Islands in the Japanese government on the different measures to sort out. Overall, through the integrity of the argument and analysis. It provides an effective analysis angle to explain the Japanese government's action and forecast the future trend from the strategic level.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號(hào)】:D822.331.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 周永生;;日本政治、社會(huì)右傾化問(wèn)題探討[J];東北亞論壇;2013年03期
2 劉江永;;安倍再度執(zhí)政后的中日關(guān)系展望[J];東北亞論壇;2013年02期
3 王少普;;野田內(nèi)閣激化釣魚島爭(zhēng)端的內(nèi)外因分析[J];國(guó)際觀察;2012年06期
4 翟新;;島爭(zhēng)擱置默契和安倍內(nèi)閣的政策變化[J];國(guó)際問(wèn)題研究;2013年06期
5 侯良健;王珊;;安倍政權(quán)對(duì)華戰(zhàn)略的轉(zhuǎn)變及其影響[J];東北亞學(xué)刊;2013年04期
6 李睿;;菅直人時(shí)期日本民主黨對(duì)華外交探析[J];理論界;2011年08期
7 王雅丹;;日本首相的“天命”及其現(xiàn)實(shí)主義對(duì)華政策——也談安倍新內(nèi)閣的對(duì)華政策[J];和平與發(fā)展;2013年01期
8 徐萬(wàn)勝;;安倍內(nèi)閣在釣魚島爭(zhēng)端中的應(yīng)對(duì)戰(zhàn)略[J];和平與發(fā)展;2014年02期
9 孫承;;菅直人內(nèi)閣對(duì)外政策調(diào)整淺析[J];日本學(xué)刊;2011年02期
10 蔡亮;;論安倍內(nèi)閣外交政策的兩面性[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治論壇;2013年02期
本文編號(hào):1371251
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/waijiao/1371251.html