冷戰(zhàn)前期MIT國(guó)際研究中心的中國(guó)“傳播”研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-06-26 23:37
本文選題:冷戰(zhàn) + 國(guó)際傳播研究; 參考:《國(guó)際新聞界》2016年05期
【摘要】:1950年代至1970年代初期MIT國(guó)際研究中心的中國(guó)傳播研究隨著該中心的"國(guó)際傳播"研究計(jì)劃而興,是冷戰(zhàn)前期美國(guó)政府反共心理戰(zhàn)的直接產(chǎn)物。它們關(guān)心既是"極權(quán)社會(huì)"又是"發(fā)展中國(guó)家"的共產(chǎn)主義中國(guó)里發(fā)生的"傳播"現(xiàn)象。在它們眼里,"傳播"既是"極權(quán)社會(huì)"中國(guó)"從上至下的政治勸服",又是"發(fā)展中國(guó)家"中國(guó)的"發(fā)展手段"或"國(guó)家整合手段"。我們?cè)诜袼歼@些研究背后的"極權(quán)社會(huì)vs.自由社會(huì)"、"傳統(tǒng)vs.現(xiàn)代"等西式二元思維框架的同時(shí),也應(yīng)反躬自省,追尋當(dāng)前中國(guó)傳播研究的超越西方霸權(quán)之道。
[Abstract]:From 1950's to the early 1970s, the Chinese communication research of MIT International Research Center came into being with the center's "International Communication" research program, which was a direct product of the American government's anti-communist psychological warfare in the early Cold War. They care about the spread in communist China, which is both a totalitarian society and a developing country. In their eyes, "communication" is not only the "political persuasion from top to bottom" of "totalitarian society", but also the "development means" or "national integration means" of "developing countries". We are thinking about the "totalitarian society" behind these studies. Free society, "traditional VS." Modern "western dual thinking frame" should also reflect on itself and pursue the way of transcending the western hegemony in the current study of Chinese communication.
【作者單位】: 華南師范大學(xué)新聞與傳播學(xué)系;復(fù)旦大學(xué)新聞傳播學(xué)博士后流動(dòng)站;
【基金】:國(guó)家社科基金青年項(xiàng)目《計(jì)劃生育政策議題的中國(guó)媒體話語建構(gòu)研究(1957-2013)》階段性成果,項(xiàng)目號(hào):14CXW043 中國(guó)博士后基金第57批面上資助項(xiàng)目《中國(guó)議題在美國(guó)大眾傳播研究中的興起(1951-2010)》資助,項(xiàng)目號(hào):2015M570319~~
【分類號(hào)】:K153;G206
,
本文編號(hào):2071838
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/sjls/2071838.html
最近更新
教材專著