本文選題：《勸學(xué)篇》 + 福澤諭吉��； 參考：《世紀(jì)》2015年03期

【摘要】：正福澤諭吉和張之洞,一位是日本平民知識分子,一位是位極人臣的清廷大官。19世紀(jì)后葉,兩人不約而同地寫下了同題著作《勸學(xué)篇》。單看書名,就能體認(rèn)其極具功利性。既然如此,自然產(chǎn)生一些問題,諸如:"勸"的是誰?"學(xué)"哪些東西?為何要"學(xué)"?福澤諭吉自稱:他的《勸學(xué)篇》"本來是以提供民眾讀本和小學(xué)課本為目的而寫的",據(jù)說,當(dāng)時日本國民一百六十人中就有一人讀過此書。而張之洞的《勸學(xué)篇》初版只印了三百冊,專差送往北京,除進(jìn)呈皇上外,
[Abstract]:FukuzawaYukichi and Zhang Zhidong, one is a Japanese civilian intellectual, the other is a very important official of the Qing Dynasty. In the latter part of the 19th century, both of them wrote the same book, "Dissuasion". If you read the title of the book alone, you will be able to recognize it as highly utilitarian. That being the case, some questions arise naturally, such as: who is the one who "exhorts"? " What do you learn? Why "learn"? FukuzawaYukichi claims that his persuasion, "originally written for the purpose of providing readers and primary school textbooks," was said to have been read by one in 160 Japanese people at the time. The first edition of Zhang Zhidong's "persuasion" only printed three hundred copies and sent it to Beijing, except for the emperor.
【分類號】：K313.4;K252

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 任光敏;近代中日兩《勸學(xué)篇》之比較研究[J];四川師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1999年03期

2 唐柳春;;從兩部《勸學(xué)篇》試分析福澤諭吉與張之洞的差異及原因[J];安徽文學(xué)(下半月);2009年03期

3 吳默聞;;學(xué)以致用 學(xué)以興國——從《勸學(xué)篇》一書看福澤諭吉的學(xué)習(xí)思想[J];學(xué)習(xí)月刊;2011年08期

4 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號：1880135