本文選題：生活質(zhì)量 + 主觀生活質(zhì)量��； 參考：《濟(jì)南大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：在我國(guó),受傳統(tǒng)觀念的影響,以及基于支付能力的考慮,居家養(yǎng)老一直是絕大部分老年人養(yǎng)老方式的首選。本文選取居家受照顧老年人為研究對(duì)象,通過(guò)訪談法和觀察法收集資料,對(duì)其生活質(zhì)量進(jìn)行了深入研究。居家受照顧老年人是指居住在家中且由于疾病、殘疾或高齡部分生活需要他人照顧的老年人,這里的“部分生活需要他人照顧”是指老人吃飯、穿衣、如廁等可以自己完成,但是做飯、洗衣、外出活動(dòng)等需要他人照顧。本研究發(fā)現(xiàn): 1.居家受照顧老年人對(duì)生活質(zhì)量的認(rèn)知內(nèi)容包括經(jīng)濟(jì)、家庭關(guān)系、健康醫(yī)療、文體活動(dòng)和居住環(huán)境。 2.居家受照顧老年人對(duì)生活質(zhì)量的認(rèn)知與一般社會(huì)成員生活質(zhì)量的測(cè)量維度不同。對(duì)居家受照顧老年人的主觀生活質(zhì)量進(jìn)行測(cè)量時(shí),不能直接使用已有的生活質(zhì)量測(cè)量量表。居家受照顧老年人生活質(zhì)量測(cè)量指標(biāo)的設(shè)計(jì)可以考慮從健康、醫(yī)療、家庭與子女關(guān)系、文娛活動(dòng)這幾個(gè)維度進(jìn)行設(shè)計(jì)。 3.居家受照顧老年人生活質(zhì)量的主觀評(píng)價(jià)與客觀評(píng)價(jià)存在差距。居家受照顧老年人對(duì)自身生活質(zhì)量的評(píng)價(jià)多是通過(guò)橫向比較和縱向比較得出的,并且居家受照顧老年人的自身素質(zhì)也影響了其對(duì)生活質(zhì)量的評(píng)價(jià)。自身素質(zhì)影響了居家受照顧老年人對(duì)參考標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的選擇,進(jìn)而影響其對(duì)自身生活質(zhì)量的評(píng)價(jià),也就是說(shuō),教育水平不同以及生活經(jīng)歷不同都使得居家受照顧老年人對(duì)生活質(zhì)量有不同的認(rèn)識(shí)。居家受照顧老年人在評(píng)價(jià)自身生活質(zhì)量時(shí)選擇了不同的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),導(dǎo)致其對(duì)生活質(zhì)量的主觀評(píng)價(jià)與客觀評(píng)價(jià)出現(xiàn)差異。此外,居家受照顧老年人對(duì)生活質(zhì)量的主觀評(píng)價(jià)高于客觀評(píng)價(jià),而客觀評(píng)價(jià)更能準(zhǔn)確反應(yīng)他們的實(shí)際生活質(zhì)量。 通過(guò)對(duì)居家受照顧老年人生活質(zhì)量相關(guān)內(nèi)容的研究可以發(fā)現(xiàn),居家受照顧老年人的生活質(zhì)量有待于進(jìn)一步提高和改善。調(diào)查顯示家人是居家受照顧老人生活質(zhì)量的重要方面,在制定老年人政策時(shí),不僅要制定針對(duì)居家受照顧老年人的政策,還要考慮到居家受照顧老年人的家庭和家人,為他們照顧老人提供便利,為居家受照顧老年人創(chuàng)造更好的家庭和社會(huì)氛圍。各級(jí)政府和組織應(yīng)共同探索,建立以社區(qū)為中心、政府為輔助、非政府組織積極介入的新型體制,在各種社會(huì)力量的支持下,根據(jù)居家受照顧老年人的實(shí)際需要。改善社區(qū)環(huán)境,擴(kuò)大綠化面積,增加適合居家受照顧老年人的活動(dòng)設(shè)施,充分挖掘、有機(jī)開(kāi)發(fā)現(xiàn)有社會(huì)資源,真正實(shí)現(xiàn)“老有所樂(lè)、老有所為”,讓居家受照顧老年人擁有一個(gè)高質(zhì)量的晚年。
[Abstract]:In our country, under the influence of the traditional concept, and based on the consideration of the ability to pay, home pension has always been the first choice for the majority of the elderly. In this paper, the quality of life (QOL) of the elderly who are cared for at home is studied by means of interview and observation. The elderly who are cared for at home refer to the elderly who live in the home and who, as a result of illness, disability or old age, need to be taken care of by others. In this case, the term "part of life needs other people's care" means that the elderly can eat, dress, go to the toilet, and so on. But cooking, laundry, outings, etc., need to be taken care of. This study found that: 1. The understanding of the quality of life of the elderly who are cared for at home includes economy, family relationship, health care, sports and activities, and living environment. 2. The cognition of quality of life of the elderly who are cared for at home is different from the measurement dimension of the quality of life of the general social members. When measuring the subjective quality of life of the elderly who are cared for at home, the existing quality of life measurement scale should not be used directly. The design of the quality of life measurement index for the elderly who are cared for at home can be considered from the aspects of health, medical treatment, family and child relationship, and recreational activities. 3. There is a gap between subjective evaluation and objective evaluation of the quality of life of the elderly cared for at home. The evaluation of the quality of life of the elderly who are taken care of at home is mostly obtained through horizontal and vertical comparison, and the quality of the elderly who are taken care of at home also affects their evaluation of the quality of life. Their own quality affects the choice of reference standards for the elderly who are cared for at home, and thus their evaluation of their own quality of life, that is, Different levels of education and different life experiences make the elderly people who are cared for at home have different understanding of the quality of life. The elderly who are cared for at home choose different criteria when evaluating their own quality of life, which leads to the difference between subjective and objective evaluation of quality of life. In addition, the subjective evaluation of the quality of life was higher than that of the objective evaluation, and the objective evaluation could more accurately reflect their actual quality of life. It is found that the quality of life of the elderly who are cared for at home needs to be further improved through the study of the contents of the quality of life of the elderly who are cared for at home. The survey shows that family is an important aspect of the quality of life of the elderly who are cared for at home. In formulating policies for the elderly, it is necessary not only to formulate policies for the elderly who are cared for at home, but also to take into account the families and families of the elderly who are cared for at home, Provide convenience for them to take care of the elderly, and create a better family and social atmosphere for the elderly who are cared for at home. Governments and organizations at all levels should jointly explore the establishment of a new type of system with the community as the center, the government as the aid, and non-governmental organizations as the active participants, with the support of various social forces, according to the actual needs of the elderly who are cared for at home. To improve the community environment, expand the area of greening, increase the activity facilities suitable for the elderly to be cared for at home, fully excavate and organically develop existing social resources, and truly realize "having fun and doing well for the elderly." Let home care for the elderly have a high quality of old age.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：濟(jì)南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：C913.6

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李加鵬;;老年人健康睡眠運(yùn)動(dòng)處方研究[J];內(nèi)江科技;2011年08期

2 段世江;安素霞;;志愿者活動(dòng)是城市老年人社會(huì)參與的主渠道——兼論老年志愿者活動(dòng)開(kāi)展的必然性[J];河北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年03期

3 張海龍;呂慧敏;張合明;;對(duì)北京市老年人生活方式與健康運(yùn)動(dòng)處方的研究[J];科技信息;2011年22期

4 黃t2;謝懷平;;長(zhǎng)株潭地區(qū)老年人健康狀況及養(yǎng)老需求調(diào)查[J];教育教學(xué)論壇;2011年29期

5 金寧;;走出“骨質(zhì)疏松的誤區(qū)”[J];晚霞;2011年17期

6 ;關(guān)注TOP[J];晚晴;2011年07期

7 陳月s，

本文編號(hào)：1951644