本文選題：非利益相關(guān)群體 + 群體事件　； 參考：《中國政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：今天的中國正處在一個社會轉(zhuǎn)型的重要時期,而這一時期也是社會沖突的高發(fā)期。近年來備受關(guān)注的群體事件就是社會沖突的一個縮影。非利益相關(guān)群體事件可以界定為全部或大多數(shù)參與者與事件起因沒有利益關(guān)系,也沒有直接利益訴求的群體事件。這類事件以其把眾多的“非利益相關(guān)者”卷入到?jīng)_突漩渦之中而備受關(guān)注。同時,這類事件也因通常伴隨有破壞性的暴力行為,嚴(yán)重影響了社會秩序而引起犯罪學(xué)界的注意。本文通過大量的調(diào)查研究,試圖將實(shí)證研究和理論研究相結(jié)合,同時運(yùn)用分類研究和比較研究,清晰界定非利益相關(guān)群體事件并結(jié)合犯罪學(xué)理論分析這類事件的成因,力求對此類事件的防控有所裨益。 本文分四部分對非利益相關(guān)群體事件進(jìn)行研究。第一部分是非利益相關(guān)群體事件概述。主要分非利益相關(guān)群體事件概念辨析、非利益相關(guān)群體事件的特點(diǎn)、非利益相關(guān)群體事件分類三部分來論述。第二部分是利益相關(guān)與非利益相關(guān)群體事件之異同。目的是通過和利益相關(guān)群體事件比較來進(jìn)一步認(rèn)識非利益相關(guān)群體事件。這部分主要對兩者進(jìn)行了差異性分析和相似性分析。其中兩者的差異性有:參與者與事件起因的利益相關(guān)度、引發(fā)原因、行為目的、行為方式以及處置難度。兩者的相似性又分兩類事件中都有民意表達(dá)和情緒宣泄、兩類事件都蘊(yùn)含利益沖突、兩類事件相互轉(zhuǎn)化的可能性探析三部分論述。第三部分是非利益相關(guān)群體事件成因探析。這部分筆者運(yùn)用不同的犯罪學(xué)理論對非利益相關(guān)群體事件成因進(jìn)行了解釋。包括默頓社會失范理論對成因的解釋、塞林文化沖突論對成因的解釋、阿格紐一般壓力理論對成因的解釋。在這一部分的最后筆者還論述了群體因素在此類事件成因中的作用。第四部分是筆者對非利益相關(guān)群體事件的防控的粗淺建議。主要從內(nèi)部防控和外部防控兩方面論述,內(nèi)部防控的目的是從根本上緩解民眾壓力,外部防控的目的是提高基層政府處置能力,努力在現(xiàn)階段維護(hù)良好的社會秩序。
[Abstract]:Today China is in an important period of social transformation, which is also a period of high incidence of social conflict. The group events that have attracted much attention in recent years are a microcosm of social conflicts. Non-stakeholder group events can be defined as group events in which all or most of the participants have no interest relationship with the cause of the event and have no direct interest claim. Such events have attracted much attention for their involvement of many non-stakeholders in the whirlpool of conflict. At the same time, such incidents have attracted the attention of criminologists because they are usually accompanied by destructive acts of violence, which seriously affect the social order. Through a lot of investigation and research, this paper attempts to combine the empirical research with the theoretical research, at the same time, using the classification research and the comparative study, clearly defines the non-interest related group events and analyzes the causes of such events with the criminology theory. Try to be helpful to the prevention and control of such incidents. This paper is divided into four parts to study non-stakeholder group events. The first part is an overview of non-stakeholder group events. This paper mainly discusses the concept of non-stakeholder group events, the characteristics of non-interest related group events, and the classification of non-interest group events. The second part is the similarities and differences between interest-related and non-interest-related group events. The purpose is to further understand non-stakeholder group events by comparing them with stakeholder events. This part mainly carries on the difference analysis and the similarity analysis to both. The differences between the two are: the interest correlation between the participants and the cause of the event, the purpose of behavior, the way of behavior and the difficulty of handling. The similarity of the two events is divided into two kinds of events: the expression of public opinion and the catharsis of emotion, the two kinds of events contain conflicts of interest, and the possibility of the two kinds of events transforming each other is discussed in three parts. The third part analyzes the causes of non-interest-related group events. In this part, the author uses different criminological theories to explain the causes of non-interest-related group events. It includes the explanation of causes in Merton's theory of social anomie, the explanation of causes in the theory of cultural conflict of Salin, and the explanation of causes in Agnew's general stress theory. At the end of this part, the author also discusses the role of group factors in the causes of such events. The fourth part is the author's suggestions on the prevention and control of non-interest-related group events. The purpose of internal prevention and control is to relieve the pressure of the public fundamentally, and the purpose of external prevention and control is to improve the ability of the grass-roots government to deal with it and to maintain a good social order at the present stage.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：C912.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 于建嶸;;中國的社會泄憤事件與管治困境[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會主義;2008年01期

2 康均心,馬力;群體性事件:一個犯罪學(xué)應(yīng)該關(guān)注的前沿問題[J];法學(xué)評論;2002年02期

3 皮藝軍;;沖突事件中的警察角色——以社會敵意研究為視角[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年05期

4 游云福;;群體性事件的分類及成因[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年06期

5 張成;;無直接利益沖突群體性事件應(yīng)急處置方略——兼對湖北石首事件處置評析[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年01期

6 皮藝軍;警察“亞文化”探析[J];江西公安專科學(xué)校學(xué)報;2003年01期

7 趙寶成;;犯罪學(xué)的價值和功用——兼談犯罪學(xué)的學(xué)科建設(shè)[J];江西公安�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2007年06期

8 應(yīng)星;;“氣場”與群體性事件的發(fā)生機(jī)制——兩個個案的比較[J];社會學(xué)研究;2009年06期

9 王利平;;“無直接利益沖突”群體性事件對策研究——基于法治的視角[J];中共福建省委黨校學(xué)報;2008年11期

10 章春明,劉華;城市群體性事件產(chǎn)生的癥結(jié)及思考[J];云南警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年01期

，

本文編號：1926114