本文選題：社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò) + 社會(huì)資本��； 參考：《上海師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著信息技術(shù)和自媒體的迅猛發(fā)展,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)普及率的不斷提升,網(wǎng)民規(guī)模不斷壯大,網(wǎng)絡(luò)社會(huì)的崛起使得網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中網(wǎng)民的互動(dòng)更加頻繁和有效。網(wǎng)民信息權(quán)力是普通網(wǎng)民與網(wǎng)絡(luò)意見(jiàn)領(lǐng)袖在網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的脫域交往互動(dòng)中衍生出的微型權(quán)力。它與政府權(quán)力正在不斷的發(fā)生著對(duì)話(huà)和碰撞,并且直接作用和影響現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)的實(shí)踐,它對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)場(chǎng)域政治生態(tài)的影響越來(lái)越大。本文運(yùn)用社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論對(duì)網(wǎng)民信息權(quán)力進(jìn)行解讀,對(duì)其概念進(jìn)行界定,闡釋其內(nèi)涵。根據(jù)社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)分析方法中的中心度,對(duì)網(wǎng)民信息權(quán)力進(jìn)行量化分析。選取網(wǎng)民信息權(quán)力的表現(xiàn)形式,網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐和網(wǎng)絡(luò)群體性事件中的網(wǎng)民互動(dòng)分析,測(cè)算互動(dòng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)中網(wǎng)民信息權(quán)力的作用大小。通過(guò)測(cè)算結(jié)果綜合分析網(wǎng)民信息權(quán)力的影響因素,明確權(quán)力的生成路徑,與政府權(quán)力的關(guān)系,以及社會(huì)效應(yīng)。以此應(yīng)對(duì)網(wǎng)民信息權(quán)力的非制度化運(yùn)作所帶來(lái)的負(fù)面影響,讓其更好的在制度化軌道內(nèi)運(yùn)行,促進(jìn)網(wǎng)絡(luò)社會(huì)的和諧發(fā)展。本文的研究結(jié)論如下:第一,網(wǎng)民信息權(quán)力是網(wǎng)民在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺(tái)上,通過(guò)信息傳遞,在彼此網(wǎng)絡(luò)互動(dòng)關(guān)系中形成的對(duì)他人和社會(huì)的影響力。其影響因素主要包括四個(gè)方面:網(wǎng)絡(luò)互動(dòng)、知識(shí)能力、社會(huì)資本以及網(wǎng)絡(luò)位置。網(wǎng)絡(luò)互動(dòng)是權(quán)力網(wǎng)絡(luò)生成的基礎(chǔ),知識(shí)能力是網(wǎng)民信息權(quán)力作用的關(guān)鍵、社會(huì)資本是決定網(wǎng)民信息權(quán)力大小的核心,網(wǎng)絡(luò)位置是網(wǎng)民信息權(quán)力生成的重點(diǎn)。第二,網(wǎng)民信息權(quán)力的作用路徑是網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間或現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)的熱點(diǎn)事件作為導(dǎo)火索,引發(fā)普通網(wǎng)民和網(wǎng)絡(luò)意見(jiàn)領(lǐng)袖的互動(dòng)熱議,以多元的互動(dòng)形式,推進(jìn)事件發(fā)展。普通網(wǎng)民依賴(lài)于知識(shí)能力擴(kuò)大話(huà)語(yǔ)影響力,網(wǎng)絡(luò)意見(jiàn)領(lǐng)袖依賴(lài)于社會(huì)資本在網(wǎng)絡(luò)權(quán)力體系中占有較大話(huà)語(yǔ)權(quán)。網(wǎng)民在不同的網(wǎng)絡(luò)位置占有不同的社會(huì)資本,最終決定自己話(huà)語(yǔ)權(quán)力的大小。網(wǎng)絡(luò)共識(shí)達(dá)成以后網(wǎng)民信息權(quán)力得以和現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)產(chǎn)生對(duì)接,話(huà)語(yǔ)作用影響下倒逼相關(guān)政府部門(mén)的介入,促進(jìn)問(wèn)題的解決和事件的平息,或者進(jìn)一步的討論。第三,網(wǎng)民信息權(quán)力與政府權(quán)力有很多不同,網(wǎng)民信息權(quán)力的權(quán)力主體更加多元;權(quán)力特征更為彌散和隱蔽;權(quán)力場(chǎng)域游走于網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)和現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì);運(yùn)作方式更為離散和高效;表現(xiàn)形式更為多元和直接。但兩者并不對(duì)立,兩者能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)有效對(duì)話(huà),良性互動(dòng)和信息共享,推進(jìn)官方和民間的話(huà)語(yǔ)網(wǎng)絡(luò)的連接,回應(yīng)和引導(dǎo)網(wǎng)民關(guān)心的熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題和事件,解決相關(guān)問(wèn)題,引導(dǎo)社會(huì)輿情正向的發(fā)展。第四,網(wǎng)民信息權(quán)力有利于拓寬民眾民主參與途徑,促進(jìn)對(duì)政府權(quán)力的監(jiān)督;有利于基層群眾參與社會(huì)治理,利用多種途徑發(fā)聲,表達(dá)民眾意志;有利于推進(jìn)網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代社會(huì)權(quán)力結(jié)構(gòu)的再分配。然而它也存在網(wǎng)絡(luò)暴力、民主參與不平等和權(quán)力濫用等問(wèn)題,需要得到對(duì)應(yīng)的措施規(guī)制。夯實(shí)基礎(chǔ),加強(qiáng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的相關(guān)法律法規(guī),完善政府網(wǎng)絡(luò)回應(yīng)機(jī)制;解決關(guān)鍵,提升網(wǎng)民的知識(shí)能力和綜合素養(yǎng),合理合法使用好網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái);緊抓核心,提高社會(huì)資本,積極培育網(wǎng)絡(luò)意見(jiàn)領(lǐng)袖;突出重點(diǎn),加強(qiáng)對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息的研判和管理,強(qiáng)化對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意的引導(dǎo)。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of information technology and self media, the popularity of Internet is increasing, the scale of Internet users is growing, and the rise of Internet society makes the interaction of Internet users more frequent and effective. The information power of Internet users is the micro rights derived from the interaction and interaction of Internet users and network opinion leaders in the network space. It has a continuous dialogue and collision with the government power, and it directly affects and affects the practice of the real society. It has more and more influence on the real field of political ecology. This paper uses social network theory to interpret the information power of netizens, defines its concept and explains its connotation. According to the social network analysis method, this paper makes an analysis of its connotation. The central degree of the Chinese netizen's information power is quantified and analyzed. The form of the information power of the netizen, the Network Anti-corruption and the interaction analysis of the Internet users are analyzed, and the effect of the information power of the Internet users in the interactive network is calculated. The influence factors of the information power of the netizens are synthetically analyzed by the calculation results, and the generation of the power is made clear. The path, the relationship with the government power, and the social effect, in order to deal with the negative influence brought by the non institutionalized operation of the information power of the netizens, let it run better in the institutionalized orbit and promote the harmonious development of the network society. The conclusions of this paper are as follows: first, the information power of the people is on the Internet platform, through the letter of the Internet. The influence of interest transmission on other people and society in the interaction of each other network. The influence factors mainly include four aspects: network interaction, knowledge ability, social capital and network position. Network interaction is the basis of power network generation, knowledge ability is the key to the function of network people's trust and interest, and social capital is the decision of the network. The core of the size of the interest power, the network position is the focal point of the information power generation of the netizens. Second, the action path of the information power of the netizens is the hot event of the network space or the real society, triggering the interactive hot discussion of the ordinary netizens and the network opinion leaders, and promoting the development of the events by the multi interaction form. The ordinary netizen depends on the knowledge. The network opinion leader relies on the social capital in the network power system. The Internet users occupy different social capital in different network positions, and ultimately determine the power of their own discourse. After the consensus is reached, the information power of the netizens can be butted with the real society. Under the influence, the intervention of the relevant government departments should be forced to promote the solution of the problem and the peace of the event, or further discussion. Third, the information power of the netizens is different from the government power, the power subject of the netizen's information power is more pluralistic; the power characteristics are more diffuse and concealed; the power field travels on the network platform and the real society; The mode is more discrete and efficient; the form of expression is more pluralistic and direct. But the two are not antagonistic. Both can achieve effective dialogue, benign interaction and information sharing, promote the connection of official and folk discourse networks, respond and guide the hot issues and events concerned by the netizens, solve related problems and guide the positive development of social public opinion. Fourth, the information power of the netizens is beneficial to widening the way of public participation in democratic participation and promoting the supervision of the power of the government; it is beneficial to the grassroots people to participate in the social governance, the use of various channels to voice, the expression of the will of the people, and the promotion of the redistribution of the social power structure in the network age. However, it also has network violence, democratic participation is unequal and power. Abuse and other problems need to be regulated by corresponding measures. Consolidate the foundation, strengthen the relevant laws and regulations of the network space, improve the response mechanism of the government network, solve the key, improve the knowledge ability and comprehensive quality of the netizens, rationally and legitimately use the network platform; grasp the core, improve the social capital, cultivate the network opinion leaders and highlight the key points. We should strengthen the judgement and management of network information and strengthen the guidance of Internet public opinion.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：C913.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊帆;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)化時(shí)代公民信息權(quán)力的建構(gòu)和演變——基于網(wǎng)絡(luò)流行語(yǔ)的話(huà)語(yǔ)分析[J];美與時(shí)代(城市版);2016年04期

2 梅梅;何明升;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)集體行動(dòng)的意義建構(gòu)——基于斯圖亞特·霍爾的編碼-解碼理論的分析[J];南京郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年03期

3 陳氚;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)權(quán)力變遷中的國(guó)家機(jī)遇[J];中共中央黨校學(xué)報(bào);2015年03期

4 肖揚(yáng)偉;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐:認(rèn)知態(tài)度與政策建議——基于201名領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部和215名普通網(wǎng)民的調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)分析[J];中州學(xué)刊;2015年01期

5 白淑英;牛鴿軍;;微博社區(qū)中的網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)與權(quán)力分配[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年06期

6 熊光清;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)公共領(lǐng)域的興起與話(huà)語(yǔ)民主的新發(fā)展[J];中國(guó)人民大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年05期

7 安孟竹;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)社會(huì)中的權(quán)力概觀(guān)——基于�？碌奈⒂^(guān)權(quán)力理論視角[J];荊楚學(xué)刊;2014年03期

8 何哲;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)社會(huì)的基本特性及其公共治理策略[J];甘肅行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年03期

9 石勁松;王婷;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代的權(quán)力話(huà)語(yǔ)[J];北京青年政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年04期

10 劉少杰;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)化時(shí)代的社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型與研究方式[J];學(xué)習(xí)與探索;2013年07期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 童希;微博上的公共事務(wù)意見(jiàn)領(lǐng)袖[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2013年

2 梁美妍;話(huà)語(yǔ)民主與微觀(guān)權(quán)力：虛擬公民社會(huì)研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2012年

3 張淑華;權(quán)利與權(quán)力雙重視角下的網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意與公共決策[D];華中科技大學(xué);2008年

4 鄒軍;虛擬世界的民間表達(dá)[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 王婧;微博傳播賦權(quán)及其影響研究[D];成都理工大學(xué);2014年

2 李亞勇;自媒體賦權(quán)失控研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2014年

3 趙麗平;網(wǎng)絡(luò)社區(qū)中的權(quán)力表現(xiàn)[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

4 易慧頻;網(wǎng)絡(luò)公共領(lǐng)域中權(quán)利與權(quán)力的博弈[D];華中師范大學(xué);2011年

5 伍林;�？吕碚撘暯窍戮W(wǎng)絡(luò)媒體中的權(quán)力關(guān)系及博弈研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1778521