本文選題：三元社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)　切入點(diǎn)：社會(huì)信任　出處：《浙江大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型和經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)軌的不斷深入,中國(guó)農(nóng)村社會(huì)和城市社會(huì)相應(yīng)地發(fā)生了很大變化,中國(guó)以往的熟人社會(huì)的信任機(jī)制也在發(fā)生轉(zhuǎn)變。已有不少研究表明,中國(guó)社會(huì)以人際信任為主,制度信任還有待發(fā)展。為細(xì)致檢驗(yàn)這一觀點(diǎn),本文利用中國(guó)社會(huì)綜合調(diào)查(CGSS2010)的統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù),并結(jié)合對(duì)河南省Z市的個(gè)案訪談,探究當(dāng)今三元社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)下,城市居民、城市農(nóng)民工、農(nóng)村居民三個(gè)群體的社會(huì)信任狀況及其差異,并分析影響社會(huì)信任的主要因素。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),制度信任和人際信任是相關(guān)的；主觀階層地位越高,信任水平越高；對(duì)群體利益沖突的感知度、社區(qū)發(fā)展參與度都對(duì)信任產(chǎn)生顯著影響：戶籍制度也影響信任水平；城市居民、農(nóng)村居民和農(nóng)民工作為三個(gè)不同群體在信任方面存在顯著差異。同時(shí),也通過(guò)個(gè)案訪談資料發(fā)現(xiàn)了影響不同群體社會(huì)信任的一些因素：人格特質(zhì)影響信任,但人際交往有助于增進(jìn)信任；社區(qū)外來(lái)人口多,居民的信任感較低；城市居民更注重契約或制度保護(hù),農(nóng)村居民更重視人情、關(guān)系,也有理性計(jì)算；人際信任和制度信任在社會(huì)信任重建中同等重要,同時(shí)把制度信任等同于政府信任；農(nóng)民工的同群效應(yīng),降低了對(duì)城市居民的信任度；無(wú)論城市還是農(nóng)村居民,幾乎不參與社區(qū)建設(shè),缺乏社區(qū)意識(shí)。有過(guò)社會(huì)欺騙經(jīng)歷的人可能更加不容易相信陌生人。 本研究共分為五個(gè)部分。第一部分,主要闡述了研究問(wèn)題的背景,進(jìn)行選題論證。第二部分,以往相關(guān)研究文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行述評(píng),界定了核心概念。第三部分,介紹本文的具體研究設(shè)計(jì)。第四部分,主要描述實(shí)證研究的處理結(jié)果并結(jié)合訪談資料,對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)處理的結(jié)果進(jìn)行較為深入的原因分析,針對(duì)研究發(fā)現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題,提出相關(guān)對(duì)策。第五部分,歸納本研究的結(jié)論；最后說(shuō)明本研究的不足之處。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of social transformation and economic transition, great changes have taken place in the rural and urban societies in China, and the trust mechanism of the acquaintance society in the past is also changing. Chinese society is dominated by interpersonal trust and institutional trust is still to be developed. In order to test this viewpoint carefully, this paper makes use of the statistical data of China Social Comprehensive Survey (CGSS 2010), and combines with a case interview in Z City, Henan Province. This paper probes into the social trust situation and its differences among urban residents, urban migrant workers and rural residents under the ternary social structure, and analyzes the main factors that affect social trust. It is found that institutional trust is related to interpersonal trust. The higher the position of subjective stratum, the higher the level of trust, the greater the perception of group conflict of interest and the degree of participation in community development have a significant impact on trust: the household registration system also affects the level of trust; There are significant differences in trust between rural residents and migrant workers as three different groups. At the same time, through case interviews, some factors affecting social trust of different groups are found: personality traits influence trust. However, interpersonal communication helps to enhance trust, the community has a large number of foreign population, the residents have a low sense of trust, urban residents pay more attention to contract or system protection, rural residents pay more attention to human feelings, relationships, and rational calculation; Interpersonal trust and institutional trust are equally important in the reconstruction of social trust. At the same time, institutional trust is equated with government trust. The homogeneity effect of migrant workers reduces the degree of trust to urban residents. People who have had a history of social deception may be less likely to trust strangers. This research is divided into five parts. The first part mainly describes the background of the research issues, topics for argumentation.The second part, the review of previous relevant research literature, defines the core concepts. The fourth part mainly describes the processing results of the empirical research and combines with the interview data to analyze the causes of the data processing results deeply, aiming at the problems found in the research. The fifth part summarizes the conclusions of this study, and finally explains the shortcomings of this study.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：C912.1;C912.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陶芝蘭;王歡;;信任模式的歷史變遷——從人際信任到制度信任[J];北京郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期

2 趙立新;從社會(huì)資本視角看當(dāng)今農(nóng)村社會(huì)信任[J];重慶社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年02期

3 王正祥;;傳媒對(duì)城市居民社會(huì)信任的影響[J];重慶文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

4 張康之;;論信任的衰落與重建[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年01期

5 甘滿堂;城市農(nóng)民工與轉(zhuǎn)型期中國(guó)社會(huì)的三元結(jié)構(gòu)[J];福州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年04期

6 孫文中;;從特殊主義到普遍主義——社會(huì)信任的變遷分析[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年06期

7 童志鋒;;信任的差序格局:對(duì)鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)人際信任的一種解釋——基于特殊主義與普遍主義信任的實(shí)證分析[J];甘肅理論學(xué)刊;2006年03期

8 王建民;;轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期中國(guó)社會(huì)的關(guān)系維持——從“熟人信任”到“制度信任”[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年06期

9 朱虹;;轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期社會(huì)信任的狀況與特征——一項(xiàng)實(shí)證研究[J];貴州社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年10期

10 劉米娜;杜俊榮;;轉(zhuǎn)型期中國(guó)城市居民政府信任研究——基于社會(huì)資本視角的實(shí)證分析[J];公共管理學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1663857