本文選題：領(lǐng)域性　切入點：鄉(xiāng)村社會　出處：《人文地理》2017年01期

【摘要】：從地理學(xué)視角看,鄉(xiāng)村治理的過程主要表現(xiàn)為鄉(xiāng)村空間權(quán)屬和空間權(quán)力的配置,即領(lǐng)域化和再領(lǐng)域化。本文從當(dāng)代鄉(xiāng)村治理的問題出發(fā),運用領(lǐng)域理論分析明清時期鄉(xiāng)村治理中的空間—社會關(guān)系及其領(lǐng)域化機制。研究表明:縣級政府構(gòu)建的行政領(lǐng)域難以實現(xiàn)全面有效的治理,鄉(xiāng)紳主導(dǎo)構(gòu)建的社會領(lǐng)域基于鄉(xiāng)村特征劃定邊界和提供公共物品并部分替代了行政領(lǐng)域,其具體領(lǐng)域化機制為家族—宗族—鄉(xiāng)族三級治理體系。本文認(rèn)為明清時期鄉(xiāng)村治理存在多元領(lǐng)域,行政領(lǐng)域與社會領(lǐng)域通過有效的協(xié)調(diào)機制相互補充使鄉(xiāng)村治理更有效。鄉(xiāng)村治理應(yīng)注重對當(dāng)?shù)厣鐣I(lǐng)域和市場領(lǐng)域的培育,同時增強行政領(lǐng)域治理的有效性及其與其他領(lǐng)域的協(xié)調(diào)能力。
[Abstract]:From the point of view of geography, the process of rural governance is mainly manifested in the ownership of rural space and the allocation of spatial power, that is, domain and re-domain. This paper analyzes the space-social relationship and its dominion mechanism in rural governance in Ming and Qing dynasties by using domain theory. The research shows that the administrative field constructed by county government is difficult to achieve comprehensive and effective governance. The social field dominated by the squire delimited the boundary and provided public goods based on the rural characteristics and partly replaced the administrative field. The specific domainization mechanism is the three-level system of family-clan and village-nationality governance. This paper holds that there were multiple fields in rural governance during the Ming and Qing dynasties. The administrative and social fields complement each other through effective coordination mechanisms to make rural governance more effective. Rural governance should focus on nurturing the local social and market fields. At the same time, enhance the effectiveness of administrative field governance and its coordination with other areas.
【作者單位】： 中山大學(xué)地理科學(xué)與規(guī)劃學(xué)院;中山大學(xué)廣東省城市化與地理環(huán)境空間模擬重點實驗室;
【基金】：國家自然科學(xué)基金項目(41571130,41271165,41130747)
【分類號】：C0;K248
，

本文編號：1663830