本文選題：人文社會(huì)科學(xué)　切入點(diǎn)：學(xué)科交叉　出處：《情報(bào)科學(xué)》2015年04期

【摘要】：基于1998-2011年CSSCI期刊引文數(shù)據(jù),從學(xué)科多樣性的角度對(duì)中國人文社會(huì)科學(xué)跨學(xué)科屬性進(jìn)行分析。以學(xué)科多樣性代表學(xué)科交叉程度,整合跨學(xué)科引用和被引兩個(gè)方向上強(qiáng)度、廣度、均勻性三個(gè)維度屬性,使用布里淵指數(shù)作為多樣性測度指標(biāo)。本文提供一個(gè)考察中文社科整體學(xué)科屬性的研究視角,結(jié)果表明:布里淵指數(shù)能夠較好反映學(xué)科引用和被引多樣性,引用多樣性方面,民族學(xué)最高,語言學(xué)最低;被引多樣性方面,政治學(xué)最高,體育學(xué)最低。對(duì)綜合多樣性的分析可將中文社科23個(gè)學(xué)科劃分為6個(gè)多樣性水平,圖書館、情報(bào)與文獻(xiàn)學(xué)處于低水平,對(duì)引用率和被引率的統(tǒng)計(jì)印證多樣性分析結(jié)果是可靠準(zhǔn)確的。最后針對(duì)圖書館、情報(bào)與文獻(xiàn)學(xué)多樣性水平較低的現(xiàn)狀,給出了相應(yīng)建議和展望。
[Abstract]:Based on the citation data of CSSCI journals from 1998 to 2011, this paper analyzes the interdisciplinary attributes of Chinese humanities and social sciences from the point of view of discipline diversity. Using Brillouin index as a measure index of diversity, this paper provides a perspective to study the attributes of Chinese social sciences as a whole. The results show that Brillouin index can better reflect the diversity of citations and citations of subjects. In terms of citation diversity, ethnology is the highest, linguistics is the lowest, and political science is the highest in cited diversity. The analysis of comprehensive diversity can divide 23 subjects of Chinese social sciences into 6 levels of diversity, while libraries, information and philology are at a low level. The statistical results of citation rate and cited rate are reliable and accurate. Finally, in view of the low level of diversity of information and bibliography in libraries, the corresponding suggestions and prospects are given.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)信息資源研究中心;
【基金】：國家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(71173249)
【分類號(hào)】：C12;G353.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 蘇新寧;;提升圖書情報(bào)學(xué)學(xué)科地位的思考——基于CSSCI的實(shí)證分析[J];中國圖書館學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期

2 趙星;譚e，

本文編號(hào)：1659118