天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當(dāng)前位置:主頁 > 社科論文 > 社會學(xué)論文 >

西咸一體化下兩地城市居民主觀生活質(zhì)量研究

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-03-05 19:28

  本文選題:西咸城市居民 切入點(diǎn):主觀生活質(zhì)量 出處:《西安工程大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文


【摘要】:人本性社會觀要求“以人為本”,關(guān)注居民的生活質(zhì)量,關(guān)注居民的生活需求,把提高全國人民的生活水平和生活質(zhì)量作為發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)的根本目的,作為全面建設(shè)小康社會的出發(fā)點(diǎn)與歸宿點(diǎn)。西安與咸陽作為關(guān)中經(jīng)濟(jì)帶最有活力增長極與西部大開發(fā)橋頭堡,2002年底,兩市政府率先提出西安、咸陽一體化。西咸一體化自實(shí)施以來,顯著改善了當(dāng)?shù)鼐用竦纳顥l件,取得了積極成效。然而兩地城市居民在家庭、工作、生態(tài)、資源、就業(yè)等具體生活領(lǐng)域方面的主觀生活質(zhì)量如何,兩市居民主觀生活質(zhì)量有無差別,該舉措具體實(shí)施效果怎么樣,這些問題都需要進(jìn)一步探討和研究。 首先,文章在參照美國、歐洲、澳大利亞、東南亞、中國等國內(nèi)外學(xué)者提出的城市居民主觀生活質(zhì)量指標(biāo)體系基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合西安、咸陽兩地實(shí)際情況,構(gòu)建了西咸城市居民主觀生活質(zhì)量評價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,,并運(yùn)用因子分析法進(jìn)行驗(yàn)正。 其次,根據(jù)構(gòu)建的指標(biāo)體系,運(yùn)用描述性分析、交叉列聯(lián)表、因子分析,對西咸兩市居民主觀生活質(zhì)量現(xiàn)狀做出分析與評價(jià);運(yùn)用獨(dú)立樣本T檢驗(yàn)、方差分析的方法,分析了主觀生活質(zhì)量的影響因素在人口學(xué)變量上的差異;并運(yùn)用相關(guān)分析、描述性分析、方差分析等多元統(tǒng)計(jì)方法,對兩市居民主觀生活質(zhì)量做橫向?qū)Ρ,分析了兩市居民在主觀生活質(zhì)量現(xiàn)狀、地區(qū)與主觀生活質(zhì)量影響因素等方面的差異,最終得出以下結(jié)論: (1)西咸居民整體生活主觀滿意度均數(shù)為3.16分,介于一般水平與較高水平之間,西咸兩地城市居民主觀生活質(zhì)量處于中等略偏上水平。 (2)西咸兩市居民主觀生活質(zhì)量在不同年齡層、不同文化程度和其他人口學(xué)變量上存在著差異。 (3)西安、咸陽兩市居民總體主觀生活質(zhì)量水平相同,但在六個(gè)具體的生活領(lǐng)域和30個(gè)具體的生活因子的得分及排序上存在著差異。 (4)西咸地區(qū)不同,兩市居民對主觀生活質(zhì)量影響因素的認(rèn)知與排序存在著差異。 論文構(gòu)建了西咸城市居民主觀生活質(zhì)量評價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,對西咸居民主觀生活質(zhì)量現(xiàn)狀及影響因素進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析,對西安與咸陽城市居民主觀生活質(zhì)量現(xiàn)狀及影響因素進(jìn)行了橫向?qū)Ρ妊芯。論文既拓展了主觀生活質(zhì)量的研究對象與研究范疇,也為相關(guān)部門進(jìn)一步提高西安與咸陽城市居民的主觀生活質(zhì)量提供了參考和借鑒。
[Abstract]:The view of human nature society requires "people-oriented", pays attention to the quality of life of the residents, pays attention to the needs of the residents, and regards the improvement of the living standards and the quality of life of the people of the whole country as the fundamental purpose of the development of the economy. As the starting point and destination of building a well-off society in an all-round way, Xi'an and Xianyang, as the most dynamic growth poles in the Guanzhong economic belt and the bridgehead for the development of the western region, were the first to propose Xi'an at the end of 2002. Xianyang integration. Since its implementation, Xixian integration has significantly improved the living conditions of local residents and achieved positive results. However, urban residents in the two places live in families, work, ecology and resources. The subjective quality of life in employment and other specific areas of life, whether there is any difference in the subjective quality of life between the residents of the two cities, and how the concrete implementation effect of this measure is, needs to be further explored and studied. First of all, on the basis of reference to the subjective quality of life index system of urban residents put forward by scholars at home and abroad, such as the United States, Europe, Australia, Southeast Asia and China, the article combines the actual situation of Xi'an and Xianyang. The subjective quality of life (QOL) evaluation index system of Xixian city residents was constructed, and the factor analysis method was used to verify the quality of life. Secondly, according to the index system, using descriptive analysis, cross-list table, factor analysis, to make an analysis and evaluation of the residents' subjective quality of life, using independent sample T-test, variance analysis method, This paper analyzes the difference in demographic variables of the influencing factors of subjective quality of life, and makes a horizontal comparison between the subjective quality of life of residents of the two cities by using multiple statistical methods, such as correlation analysis, descriptive analysis, variance analysis, etc. This paper analyzes the differences between the residents of the two cities in terms of the present situation of subjective quality of life, regional and subjective quality of life and other factors, and finally draws the following conclusions:. 1) the average of subjective satisfaction of whole life of Xixian residents is 3.16, which is between the general level and the higher level, and the subjective quality of life of the urban residents of the two places is slightly above the middle level. (2) the subjective quality of life of residents in Xishan city is different in different age groups, different education levels and other demographic variables. 3) the overall subjective quality of life of Xi'an and Xianyang is the same, but there are differences in the scores and ranking of six specific life fields and 30 specific life factors. 4) there are differences in cognition and ranking of subjective quality of life between the residents of the two cities. This paper constructs the evaluation index system of the subjective quality of life of Xixian city residents, and makes an empirical analysis of the present situation of the subjective quality of life of the residents of Xixian city and its influencing factors. The present situation and influencing factors of subjective quality of life of Xi'an and Xianyang urban residents are studied in this paper, which not only expands the research object and scope of subjective quality of life, but also makes a comparative study on the subjective quality of life of Xi'an and Xianyang. It also provides reference for relevant departments to further improve the subjective quality of life of Xi'an and Xianyang urban residents.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:西安工程大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號】:C912.81

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 方建敏;;用馬斯洛的需要理論看以人為本的發(fā)展觀[J];太原城市職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

2 陳義平;兩種生活質(zhì)量評估方法的比較分析[J];廣東社會科學(xué);1993年03期

3 金子勇;為了城市的“生活質(zhì)量”[J];國外社會科學(xué);1986年02期

4 K.蘇斯耐 ,G.A.費(fèi)舍 ,唐仲勛;“生活質(zhì)量”的社會學(xué)研究[J];國外社會科學(xué);1987年10期

5 周長城;東南亞國家的生活質(zhì)量研究[J];國外社會科學(xué);2002年06期

6 張小麗;;城市居民主觀生活質(zhì)量及影響因素[J];傳承;2008年14期

7 李正龍;;居民生活質(zhì)量滿意度的實(shí)證研究[J];華東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2006年06期

8 彭念一,李麗;我國居民生活質(zhì)量評價(jià)指標(biāo)與綜合評價(jià)研究[J];湖南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2003年05期

9 易松國,風(fēng)笑天;城市居民主觀生活質(zhì)量研究——武漢、北京、西安三地調(diào)查資料的比較分析[J];華中理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);1997年03期

10 王威,陳云;歐洲生活質(zhì)量指標(biāo)體系及其評價(jià)[J];江蘇社會科學(xué);2002年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 林木;[N];中國經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)報(bào);2004年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 余宏;上海城市居民生活質(zhì)量研究[D];上海大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 韓東曉;城市居民生活質(zhì)量評價(jià)與對策研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2004年

2 董長云;城市居民休閑生活質(zhì)量指標(biāo)體系研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2006年

3 張華;重慶市高校教師主觀生活質(zhì)量評價(jià)與管理對策研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2006年

4 陳娟;城市居民生活質(zhì)量研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2006年

5 王峰;河北省居民生活質(zhì)量評價(jià)的實(shí)證研究[D];河北大學(xué);2008年



本文編號:1571570

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/shgj/1571570.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶8cc7b***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要刪除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com