本文選題：《巴黎手稿》 + 現(xiàn)代性批判�。� 參考：《華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：在《巴黎手稿》中,馬克思在對古典經(jīng)濟學(xué)的共產(chǎn)主義批判及其與黑格爾哲學(xué)之間的親緣關(guān)系指認蘊藏著一種"經(jīng)濟學(xué)-哲學(xué)-共產(chǎn)主義思潮"三重并置的總體性的現(xiàn)代性批判視域。在此視閾中,馬克思以"異化"范疇為核心,以對黑格爾辯證法的辯證批判的形式使其獲得了"站在國民經(jīng)濟學(xué)家立場上"和"批判的形式所具有的非批判的運動"這一內(nèi)在相關(guān)性的指證,由此揭示出黑格爾"異化辯證法"的歷史性內(nèi)涵及其辯證本質(zhì),即作為"否定性的辯證法"所具有的"合理內(nèi)核"以及淪為"肯定性的辯證法"所具有的"意識形態(tài)幻象"。緣此闡釋"黑格爾—馬克思問題",不僅對以往囿于概念哲學(xué)內(nèi)部的片面解讀具有"糾偏"的方法論意義,而且對強調(diào)從歷史語境中挖掘兩者間"問題域"的轉(zhuǎn)換與顛倒、從當(dāng)代視閾中創(chuàng)新對兩者間關(guān)系的研究具有重要的范式意義。
[Abstract]:In the Paris manuscript, Marx's critique of communism in classical economics and his kinship with Hegel's philosophy contain a kind of "economics, philosophy and communist ideological trend", which is a total critique of modernity. In this vision, Marx took the category of alienation as the core. In the form of dialectical criticism of Hegel's dialectics, it has obtained evidence of the inherent relevance of "standing in the position of the national economic scientist" and "the non-critical movement of the critical form". This reveals the historical connotation and dialectical essence of Hegel's "alienation dialectics", that is, the "rational core" of "negative dialectics" and the "ideological illusion" which is reduced to "positive dialectics". Therefore, the interpretation of "Hegel-Marx problem" not only has the methodological significance of "correcting deviation" but also emphasizes the transformation and reversal of the "problem domain" between the two, which was confined to the internal of conceptual philosophy in the past. Innovation from the contemporary perspective is of great significance to the study of the relationship between the two.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學(xué)哲學(xué)院;
【基金】：“中國人民大學(xué)2016年度拔尖創(chuàng)新人才培育資助計劃”階段性成果
【分類號】：A811

【相似文獻】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前10條

1 吳松;黑格爾哲學(xué)中的歷史唯物主義萌芽[J];思想戰(zhàn)線;1981年02期

2 余源培;呂會霖;;論列寧對黑格爾哲學(xué)的研究[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1981年04期

3 聞U，

本文編號：2112737