【摘要】：邏輯實(shí)證主義興起于20世紀(jì)20年代，是語言學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)向以來最為蓬勃發(fā)展的階段，也是研究分析哲學(xué)無法忽視的一環(huán)。本文嘗試以維特根斯坦和奎因兩位20世紀(jì)分析哲學(xué)最具代表性哲學(xué)家的觀點(diǎn)為主線，闡述其在邏輯實(shí)證主義發(fā)展過程中所起的重要作用。前期維特根斯坦的《邏輯哲學(xué)論》開始了哲學(xué)的語言學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)向，為推動(dòng)以維也納學(xué)派為主要代表的邏輯實(shí)證主義的興起和產(chǎn)生發(fā)揮了重要作用。然而后期維特根斯坦的哲學(xué)思想與前期發(fā)生重大轉(zhuǎn)變，以及奎因?qū)壿媽?shí)證主義兩個(gè)教條的批判無獨(dú)有偶的預(yù)示了或促使了邏輯實(shí)證主義的衰落。從奎因開始，，與美國本土實(shí)用主義相結(jié)合的邏輯實(shí)用主義發(fā)展起來。后期維特根斯坦的理論也從關(guān)注語言形式轉(zhuǎn)向了關(guān)注語言的使用本身。兩位哲學(xué)家的哲學(xué)觀點(diǎn)從哪些方面影響著邏輯實(shí)證主義，和邏輯實(shí)證主義為我們留下了怎樣寶貴的遺產(chǎn)是本文研究的重點(diǎn)和意義。
[Abstract]:Logical positivism, which rose in the 1920s, is the most vigorous stage since the turn of linguistics. It is also a link that can not be ignored in the philosophy of research and analysis. Based on the views of Wittgenstein and Quinn, two of the most representative philosophers of analytical philosophy in the 20th century, this paper attempts to expound its important role in the development of logical positivism. The early Wittgenstein's "logical philosophy" started the linguistic turn of philosophy and played an important role in promoting the rise and production of logical positivism represented by the Vienna School. However, the late Wittgenstein's philosophy thought and the early stage had a significant change, and Quinn's critique of the two dogma of logical positivism predicted or promoted the decline of logical positivism. Since Quinn, logical pragmatism combined with American native pragmatism has developed. Later Wittgenstein's theory also changed from focusing on the form of language to focusing on the use of language itself. It is the focus and significance of this paper that the philosophical views of the two philosophers influence the logical positivism and how the logical positivism has left us a valuable legacy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：B81-06

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 江怡;;維也納學(xué)派究竟從維特根斯坦那里得到了什么?[J];科學(xué)技術(shù)與辯證法;2009年01期

2 陳波;蒯因的“兩個(gè)教條”批判及其影響[J];首都師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年03期

本文編號(hào)：2120929